Sex Differences in Ambulatory Biomechanics: A Meta-Analysis Providing a Mechanistic Insight into Knee Osteoarthritis

PurposeFemales typically present with a higher prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), and such a higher prevalence may be due to unique knee biomechanics during walking. However, the sex-dependent ambulatory mechanics has been yet to be clarified. To address this critical knowledge gap, this study implemented a series of computational approaches 1) to identify sex-related knee joint biomechanics during ambulation in persons with KOA and 2) to compare these biomechanical measures between individuals with versus without KOA, stratified by sex.MethodsWe searched five electronic databases for studies reporting sex-specific knee biomechanics in persons with and/or without KOA. Summary estimates were computed using random-effects meta-analysis and stratified by sex.ResultsThe systematic review identified 18 studies (308 males and 383 females with KOA; 740 males and 995 females without KOA). A series of meta-analyses identified female-specific knee biomechanics in a disease-dependent manner. Females with KOA had lower first peak knee adduction moment and peak knee adduction compared with male counterparts. On the other hand, healthy females had lower peak knee flexion moment than male counterparts. Effect estimate in each meta-analysis displayed poor quality of evidence according to the GRADE approach.ConclusionsThe current study is the first to consider sex as a biological variable into ambulatory mechanics in the development of KOA. We discovered that sex-dependent alterations in knee biomechanics is a function of the presence of KOA, indicating that KOA disease may be a driver of the sex-dependent biomechanical alterations or vice versa. Although no strong conclusion can be drawn because of the low quality of evidence, these findings provide new insight into the sex differences in ambulatory knee biomechanics and progression of KOA.