Different Forms of Learning and Their Relationship with Learning Outcomes Based on an "Object-Oriented Programming" Course as an Example

被引:0
作者
Lepp, Marina [1 ]
Kirotar, Carolin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Inst Comp Sci, Tartu, Estonia
来源
2024 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE, EDUCON 2024 | 2024年
关键词
programming education; distance learning; blended learning; performance;
D O I
10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578689
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Due to the pandemic, learning transformed from traditional face-to-face modes through emergency remote to distance and blended or hybrid learning. The choice of the form of teaching-learning determines how exactly studies are carried out and what role the teacher has. It is crucial to identify the optimal choice among these learning options as each offers its own set of advantages, and both students and teachers have their individual preferences. The aim of this paper is to ascertain the advantages and disadvantages of different forms of learning and examine the variations in learning outcomes in the context of different learning forms. A study was conducted by analyzing academic performance over five academic years, from 2018 to 2022, in the course "Object-oriented programming", where the grading system encompasses weekly programming assignments, quizzes based on lecture material, a group project, two programming tests and a final examination. Based on the points obtained in the course, the highest results were achieved in 2020 when emergency remote teaching was used. The results for 2019, which was the last 'normally' conducted year, were the weakest, while those for 2021 with distance learning were back to their pre-COVID levels. Offering a possibility to choose between in-class and distance education led to improved results in 2022. The comparison of the various learning forms revealed that there is no one optimal method. However, it can be speculated that blended and hybrid learning will displace face-to-face learning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Ahmed I. B., 2018, INT J ENG TECHNOL, V7, P32, DOI [10.14419/ijet.v7i3.28.20961, DOI 10.14419/IJET.V7I3.28.20961]
  • [2] A Toolkit to Support the Design of Blended Learning Courses
    Alammary, Ali Saleh
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 85530 - 85548
  • [3] CASL: Classical, Asynchronous, and Synchronous Learning Model. Towards a Universal Hybrid E-learning Model in Jordan Universities
    Aljawawdeh, Hamzeh
    Nabot, Ahmad
    [J]. 2021 22ND INTERNATIONAL ARAB CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ACIT), 2021, : 630 - 638
  • [4] Faculty's and Students' Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19
    Almahasees, Zakaryia
    Mohsen, Khaled
    Amin, Mohammad Omar
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2021, 6
  • [5] Almuraqab NAS., 2020, INT J ADV RES ENG TE, V11, P226, DOI DOI 10.34218/IJARET.11.5.2020.024
  • [6] ambi G., 2021, 2021 44 INT CONV INF, P843
  • [7] Two Sides of the Coin: Lack of Academic Integrity in Exams During the Corona Pandemic, Students' and Lecturers' Perceptions
    Amzalag, Meital
    Shapira, Noa
    Dolev, Niva
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2022, 20 (02) : 243 - 263
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, GLOSSARY ED REFORM
  • [9] [Anonymous], ENCYCLOPEDIA
  • [10] Baburajan P. K., 2022, 2022 ADV SCI ENG TEC, P1, DOI [10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734851, DOI 10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734851]