共 50 条
Maximising the potential of type 2 diabetes remission: scale up and sustainability considerations from the DiRECT-Aus implementation trial
被引:0
|作者:
Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
[1
]
Advocat, Jenny
[1
]
Ball, Lauren
[2
]
Haines, Terry
[1
]
Williams, Cylie
[1
]
Chai, Tze Lin
[1
]
Bowden, Mitchell
[3
]
Savaglio, Melissa
[3
]
Gudorf, Kate
[4
,5
]
Sturgiss, Elizabeth
[1
]
机构:
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth Care, Melbourne, Vic 3199, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Community Hlth & Wellbeing, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Hlth & Social Care Unit, Melbourne, Vic 3141, Australia
[4] Diabet Australia, Sydney, NSW 2037, Australia
[5] Western Sydney Primary Hlth Network, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia
关键词:
chronic disease;
general practice;
implementation research;
medical nutrition therapy;
primary care;
qualitative;
type;
2;
diabetes;
very low energy diet;
D O I:
10.1071/PY24116
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background Approximately 500 million people worldwide live with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The UK's 'Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial' (DiRECT) is a potential novel method for care. An Australian trial of DiRECT (DiRECT-Aus) showed that 56% of participants achieved diabetes remission at 12 months. We explored the experiences of patients, clinicians and trial partners involved in DiRECT-Aus to ascertain the acceptability and feasibility of DiRECT-Aus, as well as factors influencing implementation, to inform recommendations for sustainable scale up into mainstream primary care.Methods This qualitative implementation research conducted within a constructivist paradigm involved semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Data analysis followed an inductive thematic approach, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Results Patients (n = 14), general practitioners (n = 3), practice nurses (n = 6), dietitians (n = 7) and DiRECT-Aus trial partners (n = 5) were interviewed. We identified four core components of DiRECT-Aus that are essential for implementation and scale up. They were: (1) access to very low-energy diet products; (2) high frequency of contact with the dietitian; (3) dietitian's clinical knowledge and patient-centred practice; and (4) absence of financial costs to patients. Several additional factors that could support implementation and suggested funding models are described.Conclusions This study concludes that DiRECT-Aus was acceptable and feasible to patients and clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文