Development and validation of a French job-exposure matrix for healthcare workers: JEM Soignances

被引:1
作者
Singier, Allison [1 ]
Fadel, Marc [2 ]
Gilbert, Fabien [3 ]
Temime, Laura [4 ]
Zins, Marie [3 ]
Descatha, Alexis [2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, Irset Inst Rech Sante Environm & Travail, Inserm,EHESP,SFR ICAT,UMR S 1085, Angers, France
[2] Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, Irset Inst Rech Sante Environm & travail Angers, CHU Angers,Inserm,EHESP,SFR ICAT,UMR S 1085, Angers, France
[3] Univ Paris Cite, Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Versailles St Quentin Yvelines UVersusQ, UMS Populat Based Epidemiol Cohorts Unit 11,Inserm, Villejuif, France
[4] Conservatoire Natl Arts & Metiers, Modelisat Epidemiol & Surveillance Risques Sanit M, Paris, France
[5] CHU Angers, Poisoning Control Ctr, Federat Prevent, Angers, France
[6] Hofstra Northwell Hlth, Dept Occupat Med Epidemiol & Prevent, New York, NY USA
关键词
caregiver; CONSTANCES; exposome; exposure assessment; HCW; health professional; occupational; POPULATION-BASED COHORT; EFFORT-REWARD IMBALANCE; CONSTANCES;
D O I
10.5271/sjweh.4194
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to develop and evaluate a job-exposure matrix (JEM) specific to healthcare workers, JEM Soignances, based on self-reported data. Methods The JEM was constructed using data from healthcare workers within the CONSTANCES cohort (N=12 489). Job titles and sectors of activity (eg, hospital activities) defined occupational groups. We assessed 24 exposures covering organizational, psychosocial, physical, chemical and biological factors. Several methods (group-based frequency, CART, random forest, extreme gradient boosting machine) were applied using a 70% training sample. Performance was evaluated on the remaining 30% using area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Cohen's Kappa (kappa). Two alternative JEM were proposed using only job titles or adding healthcare establishment size and type (public/private) to define occupational groups. Results All methods offered similar discriminatory power (AUC). We selected the group-based frequency method as it was the most understandable and easiest to implement. Of the 24 included exposures, 15 demonstrated satisfactory performance, with nine showing good discriminatory power and fair-to-moderate agreement, such as physical effort at work (AUC=0.861, kappa=0.556), ionizing radiation exposure (AUC=0.865, kappa=0.457), carrying heavy loads (AUC=0.840, kappa=0.402), shift work (AUC=0.807, kappa=0.383), and formaldehyde exposure (AUC=0.847, kappa=0.289). The remaining nine exposures mainly showed poor-to-moderate discriminatory power and poor agreement. Compared to JEM Soignances, the job title-only JEM performed poorly, while the one incorporating healthcare establishment size and type showed similar results. Conclusions JEM Soignances provides good internal performance and validity. Future research will assess its external validity by comparing it with existing JEM and examining its predictive validity regarding known associations between exposures and health outcomes (eg, long working hours and strokes).
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 664
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Workplace violence in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aljohani, B.
    Burkholder, J.
    Tran, Q. K.
    Chen, C.
    Beisenova, K.
    Pourmand, A.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 196 : 186 - 197
  • [2] Facilitators, barriers and opportunities in workplace wellbeing: A national survey of emergency department staff
    Anderson, Natalie
    Pio, Fofoa
    Jones, Peter
    Selak, Vanessa
    Tan, Eunicia
    Beck, Sierra
    Hamilton, Suzanne
    Rogan, Alice
    Yates, Kim
    Sagarin, Mark
    McLeay, Adam
    MacLean, Alistair
    Fayerberg, Eugene
    Hayward, Luke
    Chiang, Arthur
    Cadzow, Alastair
    Cadzow, Natalie
    Moran, Suzanne
    Nicholls, Mike
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2021, 57
  • [3] Bataille-Hembert A, 2023, RAPPORT SANTE PROFES
  • [4] Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in medical staff: trends during the 2009-2019 period in a multicentric study
    Baudin, Clemence
    Vacquier, Blandine
    Thin, Guillemette
    Chenene, Lamine
    Guersen, Joel
    Partarrieu, Isabelle
    Louet, Martine
    Ducou Le Pointe, Hubert
    Mora, Stephanie
    Verdun-Esquer, Catherine
    Feuardent, Juliette
    Rousseau, Frederic
    Roy, Herve
    Bensefa-Colas, Lynda
    Boyer, Louis
    Bernier, Marie-Odile
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (08) : 5675 - 5684
  • [5] Job Exposure Matrix, a Solution for Retrospective Assessment of Particle Exposure in a Subway Network and Their Long-Term Effects
    Ben Rayana, Tesnim
    Wild, Pascal
    Debatisse, Amelie
    Jouannique, Valerie
    Sakthithasan, Kirushanthi
    Suarez, Guillaume
    Canu, Irina Guseva
    [J]. TOXICS, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [6] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [7] BREIMAN L, 1984, CLASSIFICATION REGRE, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
  • [8] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [9] Determining an optimal minimum number of subjects in each occupation for a job exposure matrix (JEM) using self-reported data: a missing test
    Choi, BongKyoo
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2019, 45 (04) : 421 - 422
  • [10] Exposure to job-stress factors in a national survey in France
    Cohidon, C
    Niedhammer, I
    Wild, P
    Guéguen, A
    Bonenfant, S
    Chouanière, D
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2004, 30 (05) : 379 - 389