Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in asymptomatic cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The role of anticoagulation in asymptomatic cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in this patient population. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to August 2024. The primary outcomes analyzed were PVT recanalization, progression of PVT, bleeding events, and mortality. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous variables. Results Seventeen studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, were included in the analysis. Compared to no intervention, anticoagulation significantly increased the PVT recanalization rate (OR = 3.89, p < .001) and decreased the PVT progression rate (OR = 0.28, p < .001) as well as overall mortality (OR = 0.66, p = .008). Importantly, anticoagulation did not significantly increase the bleeding rate (OR = 1.21, p = .41). Subgroup analysis revealed a greater benefit in PVT recanalization within the short-term treatment subgroup (<= 6 months) compared to long-term treatment subgroup (> 6 months), and in the Asian subgroup compared to the European or United States of America (USA) subgroup. In the Warfarin subgroup, while the total bleeding rate increased significantly, there was no significant rise in major bleeding events. Additionally, a downward trend in variceal bleeding was observed in the Asian subgroup (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.19-1.04; p = .06). Conclusion Anticoagulation is both safe and effective for asymptomatic cirrhotic patients with PVT. It not only treats PVT and reduces all-cause mortality, but also does so without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding events.