Can CMIP6 Models Accurately Reproduce Terrestrial Evapotranspiration Across China?

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Hui [1 ]
Li, Jianduo [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Guocan [1 ]
Ye, Aizhong [1 ]
Mao, Yuna [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] CMA Earth Syst Modeling & Predict Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; CMIP6; models; evapotranspiration; model evaluation; WATER-BALANCE; CLIMATE; UNCERTAINTY; EVAPORATION; TRENDS; PRECIPITATION; PRODUCTS; DROUGHT; BASIN; GLEAM;
D O I
10.1002/joc.8794
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) plays a fundamental role in the climate system. The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) provides a valuable framework for assessing global climate model performance, but gaps remain in evaluating its ET estimates, particularly in China. To fill this gap, we employed the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM) and the water balance ET method to validate the CMIP6 ET outputs from 1980 to 2014 at both national and river basin scales. Key findings include: (1) GLEAM ET performs comparably to the water balance method, making it reliable for validating CMIP6 ET outputs. From 1980 to 2014, the annual mean ET in GLEAM for China ranges from 355 to 411 mm/year. In contrast, most CMIP6 models overestimate ET, with the multi-model ensemble (MME) mean ranging from 524 to 542 mm/year, showing considerable variation among models. Spatially, the MME overestimates ET across over 90% of China. Bayesian model averaging (BMA) results align closely with reference data, with overestimation concentrated in southwest China. (2) At the national scale, CMIP6 trends range from -0.36 to 0.58 mm/year2, which contrasts sharply with the GLEAM trend of 1.27 mm/year2. At the basin scale, most models overestimate annual ET compared to GLEAM, with discrepancies particularly evident in the major river basins. The smallest difference in ET trend simulation occurs in the Northwest River basin, where model distributions are more concentrated, while the largest discrepancies appear in the Pearl River basin, where model performance is more scattered. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis reveals high ensemble consistency in regions such as the Haihe, Yellow, Yangtze, Pearl and Songliao River basins, indicating more reliable model performance in these areas. This study contributes to enhancing the reliability and accuracy of climate projections, which is essential for informed decision-making and policy formulation in atmospheric science.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of Extreme Precipitation Indices over Indochina and South China in CMIP6 Models
    Tang, Bin
    Hu, Wenting
    Duan, Anmin
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (18) : 7507 - 7524
  • [42] Examining the Ability of CMIP6 Models to Reproduce the Upwelling SST Imprint in the Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems
    Varela, Ruben
    DeCastro, Maite
    Rodriguez-Diaz, Laura
    Dias, Joao Miguel
    Gomez-Gesteira, Moncho
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [43] Evolution of Uncertainty in Terrestrial Carbon Storage in Earth System Models from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Wei, Ning
    Xia, Jianyang
    Zhou, Jian
    Jiang, Lifen
    Cui, Erqian
    Ping, Jiaye
    Luo, Yiqi
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (17) : 5483 - 5499
  • [44] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models performance in simulating temperature in Northeast China
    He XiaMan
    Jiang Chao
    Wang Jun
    Wang XiangPing
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2022, 65 (11): : 4194 - 4207
  • [45] To what extent horizontal resolution improves the simulation of precipitation in CMIP6 HighResMIP models over Southwest China?
    Jin, Zhengrui
    Ge, Fei
    Chen, Quanliang
    Lin, Zhiye
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [46] Insight from CMIP6 SSP-RCP scenarios for future drought characteristics in China
    Su, Buda
    Huang, Jinlong
    Mondal, Sanjit Kumar
    Zhai, Jianqing
    Wang, Yanjun
    Wen, Shanshan
    Gao, Miaoni
    Lv, Yanran
    Jiang, Shan
    Jiang, Tong
    Li, Aiwei
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2021, 250
  • [47] Assessing the Performance of CMIP6 Models in Simulating Droughts across Global Drylands
    Yu, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Lixia
    Zhou, Tianjun
    Zheng, Jianghua
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2024, 41 (02) : 193 - 208
  • [48] Assessing the Performance of CMIP6 Models in Simulating Droughts across Global Drylands
    Xiaojing Yu
    Lixia Zhang
    Tianjun Zhou
    Jianghua Zheng
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2024, 41 : 193 - 208
  • [49] Land-Use-Change-Induced Cooling and Precipitation Reduction in China: Insights from CMIP6 Models
    Tian, Peizhi
    Jian, Binyang
    Li, Jianrui
    Cai, Xitian
    Wei, Jiangfeng
    Zhang, Guo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [50] Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models in Simulating Climate over China and the East Asian Monsoon
    Jiang, Dabang
    Hu, Dan
    Tian, Zhiping
    Lang, Xianmei
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 37 (10) : 1102 - 1118