Can CMIP6 Models Accurately Reproduce Terrestrial Evapotranspiration Across China?

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Hui [1 ]
Li, Jianduo [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Guocan [1 ]
Ye, Aizhong [1 ]
Mao, Yuna [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] CMA Earth Syst Modeling & Predict Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; CMIP6; models; evapotranspiration; model evaluation; WATER-BALANCE; CLIMATE; UNCERTAINTY; EVAPORATION; TRENDS; PRECIPITATION; PRODUCTS; DROUGHT; BASIN; GLEAM;
D O I
10.1002/joc.8794
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) plays a fundamental role in the climate system. The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) provides a valuable framework for assessing global climate model performance, but gaps remain in evaluating its ET estimates, particularly in China. To fill this gap, we employed the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM) and the water balance ET method to validate the CMIP6 ET outputs from 1980 to 2014 at both national and river basin scales. Key findings include: (1) GLEAM ET performs comparably to the water balance method, making it reliable for validating CMIP6 ET outputs. From 1980 to 2014, the annual mean ET in GLEAM for China ranges from 355 to 411 mm/year. In contrast, most CMIP6 models overestimate ET, with the multi-model ensemble (MME) mean ranging from 524 to 542 mm/year, showing considerable variation among models. Spatially, the MME overestimates ET across over 90% of China. Bayesian model averaging (BMA) results align closely with reference data, with overestimation concentrated in southwest China. (2) At the national scale, CMIP6 trends range from -0.36 to 0.58 mm/year2, which contrasts sharply with the GLEAM trend of 1.27 mm/year2. At the basin scale, most models overestimate annual ET compared to GLEAM, with discrepancies particularly evident in the major river basins. The smallest difference in ET trend simulation occurs in the Northwest River basin, where model distributions are more concentrated, while the largest discrepancies appear in the Pearl River basin, where model performance is more scattered. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis reveals high ensemble consistency in regions such as the Haihe, Yellow, Yangtze, Pearl and Songliao River basins, indicating more reliable model performance in these areas. This study contributes to enhancing the reliability and accuracy of climate projections, which is essential for informed decision-making and policy formulation in atmospheric science.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Future Drought Changes in China Projected by the CMIP6 Models: Contributions from Key Factors
    Chen, Qingxin
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Hua, Lijuan
    Yu, Jinhua
    Wang, Yafang
    Xu, Chuan
    JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 37 (04) : 454 - 468
  • [22] Evaluation of global terrestrial near-surface wind speed simulated by CMIP6 models and their future projections
    Shen, Cheng
    Zha, Jinlin
    Li, Zhibo
    Azorin-Molina, Cesar
    Deng, Kaiqiang
    Minola, Lorenzo
    Chen, Deliang
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2022, 1518 (01) : 249 - 263
  • [23] Preconditions for CMIP6 models to reproduce the relationship between wintertime ENSO and subsequent East Asian summer rainfall
    Fu, Yuanhai
    Lin, Zhongda
    Wang, Tao
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2021, 84 : 133 - 144
  • [24] Added value of CMIP6 models over CMIP5 models in simulating the climatological precipitation extremes in China
    Luo, Neng
    Guo, Yan
    Chou, Jieming
    Gao, Zhibo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (02) : 1148 - 1164
  • [25] Observed and Future Precipitation and Evapotranspiration in Water Management Zones of Uganda: CMIP6 Projections
    Onyutha, Charles
    Asiimwe, Arnold
    Ayugi, Brian
    Ngoma, Hamida
    Ongoma, Victor
    Tabari, Hossein
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (07)
  • [26] Contributions of Anthropogenic Forcings to Evapotranspiration Changes Over 1980-2020 Using GLEAM and CMIP6 Simulations
    Liu, Jianyu
    Zhang, Jiawen
    Kong, Dongdong
    Feng, Xingyu
    Feng, Shuyun
    Xiao, Mingzhong
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2021, 126 (22)
  • [27] Evaluation and Projection of Precipitation in CMIP6 Models over the Qilian Mountains, China
    Yang, Xiaohong
    Sun, Weijun
    Wu, Jiake
    Che, Jiahang
    Liu, Mengyuan
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Wang, Yingshan
    Huai, Baojuan
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [28] The Future Change in Evaporation Based on the CMIP6 Merged Data Generated by Deep-Learning Method in China
    Niu, Xianghua
    Wei, Xikun
    Tian, Wei
    Wang, Guojie
    Zhu, Wenhui
    WATER, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [29] No Emergence of Deep Convection in the Arctic Ocean Across CMIP6 Models
    Heuze, Celine
    Liu, Hailong
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 51 (04)
  • [30] Evaluation of atmospheric circulations for dynamic downscaling in CMIP6 models over East Asia
    Song, Shuaifeng
    Zhang, Xuezhen
    Gao, Zhibo
    Yan, Xiaodong
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2023, 60 (7-8) : 2437 - 2458