Can CMIP6 Models Accurately Reproduce Terrestrial Evapotranspiration Across China?

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Hui [1 ]
Li, Jianduo [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Guocan [1 ]
Ye, Aizhong [1 ]
Mao, Yuna [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] CMA Earth Syst Modeling & Predict Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; CMIP6; models; evapotranspiration; model evaluation; WATER-BALANCE; CLIMATE; UNCERTAINTY; EVAPORATION; TRENDS; PRECIPITATION; PRODUCTS; DROUGHT; BASIN; GLEAM;
D O I
10.1002/joc.8794
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) plays a fundamental role in the climate system. The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) provides a valuable framework for assessing global climate model performance, but gaps remain in evaluating its ET estimates, particularly in China. To fill this gap, we employed the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM) and the water balance ET method to validate the CMIP6 ET outputs from 1980 to 2014 at both national and river basin scales. Key findings include: (1) GLEAM ET performs comparably to the water balance method, making it reliable for validating CMIP6 ET outputs. From 1980 to 2014, the annual mean ET in GLEAM for China ranges from 355 to 411 mm/year. In contrast, most CMIP6 models overestimate ET, with the multi-model ensemble (MME) mean ranging from 524 to 542 mm/year, showing considerable variation among models. Spatially, the MME overestimates ET across over 90% of China. Bayesian model averaging (BMA) results align closely with reference data, with overestimation concentrated in southwest China. (2) At the national scale, CMIP6 trends range from -0.36 to 0.58 mm/year2, which contrasts sharply with the GLEAM trend of 1.27 mm/year2. At the basin scale, most models overestimate annual ET compared to GLEAM, with discrepancies particularly evident in the major river basins. The smallest difference in ET trend simulation occurs in the Northwest River basin, where model distributions are more concentrated, while the largest discrepancies appear in the Pearl River basin, where model performance is more scattered. Furthermore, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis reveals high ensemble consistency in regions such as the Haihe, Yellow, Yangtze, Pearl and Songliao River basins, indicating more reliable model performance in these areas. This study contributes to enhancing the reliability and accuracy of climate projections, which is essential for informed decision-making and policy formulation in atmospheric science.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of global terrestrial evapotranspiration in CMIP6 models
    Wang, Zhizhen
    Zhan, Chesheng
    Ning, Like
    Guo, Hai
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 143 (1-2) : 521 - 531
  • [2] Projections of precipitation over China based on CMIP6 models
    Tian, Jiaxi
    Zhang, Zengxin
    Ahmed, Zeeshan
    Zhang, Leying
    Su, Buda
    Tao, Hui
    Jiang, Tong
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 35 (04) : 831 - 848
  • [3] Global assessment of terrestrial precipitation and evapotranspiration in CMIP6 simulations using observation-based estimates
    Sun, Shanshan
    Xu, Shiqin
    Li, Lingcheng
    Lin, Yihua
    Liu, Hongbo
    Maggioni, Viviana
    Xu, Yan
    Fu, Congsheng
    FRONTIERS IN WATER, 2025, 7
  • [4] A Distinct Role for Aerosol and GHG Forcing in Historical CMIP6 Evapotranspiration Trends
    Egli, Marius
    Humphrey, Vincent
    Sippel, Sebastian
    Knutti, Reto
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [5] Future drought in CMIP6 projections and the socioeconomic impacts in China
    Chen, Liqin
    Wang, Guojie
    Miao, Lijuan
    Gnyawali, Kaushal Raj
    Li, Shijie
    Amankwah, Solomon Obiri Yeboah
    Huang, Jinlong
    Lu, Jiao
    Zhan, Mingyue
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (08) : 4151 - 4170
  • [6] Significant Disparity in Spatiotemporal Changes of Terrestrial Evapotranspiration across Reanalysis Datasets in China from 1982 to 2020
    Bai, Jiaxin
    Wu, Guocan
    Mao, Yuna
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [7] Can CMIP6 models reproduce the influence of ENSO on the variability of boreal winter Hadley Circulation?
    Wang, Shuang
    Xu, Falei
    Feng, Juan
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2024, 309
  • [8] The Annual Cycle of Terrestrial Water Storage Anomalies in CMIP6 Models Evaluated against GRACE Data
    Wu, Ren-Jie
    Lo, Min-Hui
    Scanlon, Bridget R.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (20) : 8205 - 8217
  • [9] Anthropogenic influence on extreme temperatures in China based on CMIP6 models
    Hu, Ting
    Sun, Ying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (05) : 2981 - 2995
  • [10] Future changes of global potential evapotranspiration simulated from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models
    Liu, Xinlei
    Li, Chunxiang
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Han, Lin
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 13 (06) : 568 - 575