FLUID-STRUCTURE-SOIL INTERACTION STUDY FOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES WITH LARGE POOL WATER CONSIDERING NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR

被引:0
作者
Sato, Yuki [1 ]
Ghiocel, Dan M. [2 ]
Kataoka, Shunji [1 ]
Morimoto, Yasutomi [1 ]
机构
[1] JGC Corp, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Ghiocel Predict Technol Inc, New York, NY USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2024 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, VOL 9, ICONE31 2024 | 2024年
关键词
soil-structure interaction; fluid-structure interaction; nonlinear analysis; RC structure; 3D FEM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effects of the Fluid-Structure-Soil Interaction (FSSI) on the seismic responses of a deeply embedded nuclear facility with large water pools under severe earthquakes. This paper presents new seismic analysis method considering FSSI using 3D FEM for deeply embedded typical RC (Reinforced Concrete) shear wall nuclear buildings. In the new method, the commercial SSI analysis software, ACS SASSI was used with Option AA-F, which treats ANSYS fluid element FLUID80 dynamic matrices in ACS SASSI environment. By using the method it was confirmed that large pool water in the building provides significant local deformation of the pool walls, while the effects on other part of the structures are almost negligible from engineering point of view. To investigate more with the structure behavior during severe earthquakes, the nonlinear behavior of the structure was also taken into account with the new FSSI method using ACS SASSI NQA Option NON. To model the RC wall nonlinear behavior, their nonlinear backbone curves (BBCs) were computed using both Japanese and America standards. Then, the nonlinear analysis responses with both standards were compared. It was confirmed that the nonlinear structure behavior produced a visible shift of the ISRS spectral peak responses to the lower frequencies in comparison with the response of linear analysis. Also, although some significant differences of seismic responses were not observed between Japanese standard and American standard, it was confirmed that the differences of formulae in each code were reflected on their seismic responses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] American Concrete Institute, 2020, ACI 318-19
  • [2] American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017, ASCE 4-16
  • [3] Architectural Institute of Japan, 2018, AIJ Standard for Structural Calculation of Reinforced Concrete Structures
  • [4] Cheng Y.F, 1989, CE 89-30
  • [5] Ghiocel D.M, 2022, SMIRT26 SPEC SESS NO
  • [6] Nuclear Standard Committee of Japan Electric Association, 2016, Japan Electric Association Code (JEAC 4601- 2015)
  • [7] NuScale Power LLC, 2020, NuScale Standard Plant Design Certification Application
  • [8] Sato Y, 2024, SMIRT27 C DIV 3 YO 1