Examining the nexus of energy intensity, renewables, natural resources, and carbon intensity in India

被引:0
作者
OEzkan, Oktay [1 ]
Obekpa, Hephzibah Onyeje [2 ]
Alola, Andrew Adewale [3 ]
机构
[1] Tokat Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, Tokat, Turkiye
[2] Fed Univ Agr, Dept Agr Econ, Makurdi, Nigeria
[3] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, CREDS Ctr Res Digitalizat & Sustainabil, N-2418 Elverum, Norway
关键词
India; carbon intensity; renewable energy; energy intensity; natural resources; dynamic simulated ARDL; KRLS; CO2; EMISSIONS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; TIME-SERIES; DETERMINANTS; ELECTRICITY; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
India remained the third-largest energy consumer in the world, responsible for around 7% of global carbon emissions due to rising incomes and improving living standards. Although resource extraction has quadrupled since 1970 due to rising population and demand for natural resources, energy use and transformation, notably of fossil fuel energy, have increased by around 45%, thus increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this view, this study aims to explore energy intensity, renewable energy, natural resources, economic growth, and environmental degradation nexus in India. The novel dynamic simulated autoregressive distributed lag and kernel-based regularized least squares (KRLS) approaches are used to explore the effects of energy intensity, renewable energy, natural resources, and economic growth on carbon intensity for India from 1970 to 2020. The empirical results reveal that renewable energy and natural resources improve India's environmental quality via the mitigation of carbon emissions. It is also found that energy intensity and economic growth deteriorate the country's environmental quality by increasing carbon emissions in the short- and long run. A series of robustness estimation affirms the above evidence, thus providing requisite guideline for relevant policy recommendations for the country.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 186
页数:19
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [11] Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 685 : 702 - 709
  • [12] [Anonymous], World Development Indicators October 2020 edition) (database)
  • [13] [Anonymous], 2022, DataBank Education Statistics: All Indicators
  • [14] [Anonymous], 2020, Washington Post
  • [15] Baloch MA., 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P9461, DOI DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-1230-0
  • [16] How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?
    Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Roubaud, David
    Farhani, Sahbi
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 113 : 356 - 367
  • [17] Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 657 : 1023 - 1029
  • [18] Applying a dynamic ARDL approach to the Environmental Phillips Curve (EPC) hypothesis amid monetary, fiscal, and trade policy uncertainty in the USA
    Bhowmik, Roni
    Syed, Qasim Raza
    Apergis, Nicholas
    Alola, Andrew A.
    Gai, Zeyu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (10) : 14914 - 14928
  • [19] India has natural resource capacity to achieve nutrition security, reduce health risks and improve environmental sustainability
    Damerau, Kerstin
    Davis, Kyle Frankel
    Godde, Cecile
    Herrero, Mario
    Springmann, Marco
    Bhupathiraju, Shilpa N.
    Myers, Samuel S.
    Willett, Walter
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2020, 1 (10): : 631 - 639
  • [20] Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries
    Danish
    Baloch, Muhammad Awais
    Mahmood, Nasir
    Zhang, Jian Wu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 678 : 632 - 638