Combined first-trimester screening for preterm small-for-gestational-age infants: Australian multicenter clinical feasibility study

被引:0
作者
Selvaratnam, R. J. [1 ,2 ]
Rolnik, D. L. [1 ]
Setterfield, M. [3 ]
Wallace, E. M. [4 ]
Hyett, J. A. [5 ]
Da Silva Costa, F. [6 ,7 ]
Mclennan, A. C. [3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Ritchie Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Victorian Govt, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Safer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Discipline Obstet Gynaecol & Neonatol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Ingham Inst & Western Sydney Univ, Obstet Res Grp, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[6] Griffith Univ, Gold Coast Univ Hosp, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Gold Coast, Australia
[7] Griffith Univ, Sch Med, Gold Coast, Australia
[8] Sydney Ultrasound Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
fetal growth restriction; first trimester; screening; SGA; small-for-gestational age; ultrasound; FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; MATERNAL CHARACTERISTICS; 3; TRIMESTERS; PREVENTION; ASPIRIN; PREECLAMPSIA;
D O I
10.1002/uog.29174
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) first-trimester competing-risks screening model for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses requiring delivery at < 37 weeks' gestation, in a large cohort of women receiving maternity care in Australia. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a cohort of women attending one of two private multicenter fetal medicine practices for first-trimester screening for preterm pre-eclampsia (PE), defined as PE requiring delivery before 37 weeks' gestation. Risk for preterm SGA, defined as SGA requiring delivery before 37 weeks, was calculated but was not disclosed to the patient or referring physician. Screening data were matched to obstetric outcomes. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the FMF screening model in assessing the risk of preterm SGA. The potential effect on identifying other adverse pregnancy outcomes was also assessed. Results During the study period, 22 841 women with a singleton pregnancy underwent combined first-trimester screening for preterm PE. These data were compared with those of 301 721 women in the state of Victoria with a singleton pregnancy who did not undergo screening during the study period. Calculation of the risk for preterm SGA identified 3030 (13.3%) pregnancies as high risk. The sensitivity of the model was 48.6% (95% CI, 41.0-56.2%), specificity was 87.0% (95% CI, 86.6-87.5%) and positive and negative predictive values were 2.9% (95% CI, 2.7-3.1%) and 99.5% (95% CI, 99.4-99.6%) respectively. Pregnancies at high risk for preterm SGA were also more likely to have preterm PE (risk ratio (RR), 2.28 (95% CI, 1.72-3.03)) and preterm birth (RR, 1.46 (95% CI, 1.32-1.63)), compared with unscreened pregnancies. Pregnancies at low risk for preterm SGA were less likely to result in a stillbirth (RR, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47-0.86)) compared with unscreened pregnancies. Conclusion Combined first-trimester screening for preterm SGA shows moderate screening efficacy and therefore could help to inform pregnancy management and improve antenatal resource allocation. (c) 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 190
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of routine first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia on small-for-gestational-age birth: secondary interrupted time series analysis
    Guy, G. P.
    Leslie, K.
    Gomez, D. Diaz
    Forenc, K.
    Buck, E.
    Bhide, A.
    Thilaganathan, B.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [2] First-Trimester Biochemical Markers and Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants
    Andrade, Claudia
    Santos, Joana
    Pinto, Ana Rita
    Manso, Pedro
    Pereira, Susana
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2014, 27 (02): : 191 - 195
  • [3] Differential performance of first-trimester screening in predicting small-for-gestational-age neonate or fetal growth restriction
    Crovetto, F.
    Triunfo, S.
    Crispi, F.
    Rodriguez-Sureda, V.
    Dominguez, C.
    Figueras, F.
    Gratacos, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (03) : 349 - 356
  • [4] Diagnostic accuracy of the Gaussian first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia to predict small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Mendoza, Manel
    Serrano, Berta
    Bonacina, Erika
    Capote, Sira
    Garcia-Manau, Pablo
    Regincos, Laia
    Murcia, Maria Teresa
    Barberan, Lidia
    Miguez, Marta
    Carreras, Elena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 156 (02) : 322 - 330
  • [5] First-trimester placental ultrasound and maternal serum markers as predictors of small-for-gestational-age infants
    Schwartz, Nadav
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Leite, Rita
    Parry, Samuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (03) : 253.e1 - 253.e8
  • [6] First-trimester screening for early and late small-for-gestational-age neonates using maternal serum biochemistry, blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler
    Crovetto, F.
    Crispi, F.
    Scazzocchio, E.
    Mercade, I.
    Meler, E.
    Figueras, F.
    Gratacos, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 43 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [7] External validation and clinical usefulness of first-trimester prediction models for small- and large-for-gestational-age infants: a prospective cohort study
    Meertens, L. J. E.
    Smits, L. J. M.
    van Kuijk, S. M. J.
    Aardenburg, R.
    van Dooren, I. M. A.
    Langenveld, J.
    Zwaan, I. M.
    Spaanderman, M. E. A.
    Scheepers, H. C. J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (04) : 472 - 484
  • [8] Second-trimester contingent screening for small-for-gestational-age neonate
    Nowacka, U.
    Papastefanou, I
    Bouariu, A.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [9] First-trimester increase in oxidative stress and risk of small-for-gestational-age fetus
    Potdar, N.
    Singh, R.
    Mistry, V.
    Evans, M. D.
    Farmer, P. B.
    Konje, J. C.
    Cooke, M. S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (05) : 637 - 642
  • [10] First-trimester screening and small for gestational age in twin pregnancies: a single center cohort study
    Queiros, Alexandra
    Bernardo, Ana
    Rijo, Claudia
    Carocha, Ana
    Ferreira, Leonor
    Martins, Ana Teresa
    Cohen, Alvaro
    Alves, Marta
    Papoila, Ana Luisa
    Simoes, Teresinha
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2025, 311 (01) : 43 - 53