Effect of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein with LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and prognostication of hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:0
作者
Kim, Dong Hwan [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Koo, Boyeon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Choi, Se Jin [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Hyeon Ji [1 ,2 ]
Heo, Subin [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Jae Ho [1 ,2 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Liver; Liver neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnosis; Prognosis; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; ACID;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-025-11418-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the performance of combining serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) with LI-RADS (LI-RADS + AFP) on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) <= 3.0 cm and predicting post-surgical patient outcomes, compared to LI-RADS v2018. Methods Patients with hepatic observations <= 3.0 cm who underwent preoperative gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. In LI-RADS + AFP, LR-4 (probably-HCC), LR-M (probably or definitely-malignant but not HCC specific), or LR-TIV (definite-tumor-in-vein) by LI-RADS v2018 was upgraded to LR-5 (definitely-HCC) if they met AFP criteria based on three different cut-offs (>= 20, >= 200, >= 400 ng/mL). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 and LI-RADS + AFP LR-5 were compared using generalized estimating equations. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two groups (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) of LI-RADS v2018 and LI-RADS + AFP were compared using log-rank tests. Results In 520 observations from 414 patients (mean age, 60 +/- 9 years; 328 men), LI-RADS + AFP >= 20 ng/mL (LI-RADS + AFP20) showed the highest accuracy among the three cut-offs. Compared to LI-RADS v2018, LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC (79.9% [95% confidence interval, 75.7-83.6] vs. 71.8% [67.2-76.1], p < 0.001) and accuracy (82.7% [79.2-85.9] vs. 76.9% [73.1-80.5], p < 0.001) without difference in specificity (93.5% [87.1-97.4] vs. 96.3% [90.8-99.0], p = 0.083). Unlike LI-RADS v2018, showing no difference in RFS between LR-4/5 and LR-M (50.6 vs. 42.6 months; p = 0.078), LI-RADS + AFP20 showed significant differences in RFS (50.6 vs. 35.0 months; p < 0.001) and OS (67.6 vs. 54.8 months, p = 0.008). Conclusion Combining AFP and LI-RADS v2018 resulted in better diagnostic performance and superior post-surgical prognostication compared to LI-RADS v2018 alone.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] American College of Radiology, 2024, CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2018
  • [2] Curative Resection of Single Primary Hepatic Malignancy: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Category LR-M Portends a Worse Prognosis
    An, Chansik
    Park, Sumi
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Kim, Do-Young
    Kim, Seung-Seob
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Choi, Jin-Young
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (03) : 576 - 583
  • [3] Management of hepatoceullular carcinoma
    Bruix, J
    Sherman, M
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (05) : 1208 - 1236
  • [4] LI-RADS Classification and Prognosis of Primary Liver Cancers at Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Park, So Hyun
    Kim, Kang Mo
    Yu, Eunsil
    Park, Yangsoon
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Lee, Moon-Gyu
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 290 (02) : 388 - 397
  • [5] European Assoc Study Liver, 2018, J HEPATOL, V69, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019
  • [6] Multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: intrahepatic metastasis or multicentric carcinogenesis?
    Feo, Francesco
    Pascale, Rosa M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (01)
  • [7] Is It Time to Expand the Definition of Washout Appearance in LI-RADS?
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (03) : 658 - 659
  • [8] Biology and significance of alpha-fetoprotein in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Galle, Peter R.
    Foerster, Friedrich
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Chan, Stephen L.
    Llovet, Josep M.
    Qin, Shukui
    Schelman, William R.
    Chintharlapalli, Sudhakar
    Abada, Paolo B.
    Sherman, Morris
    Zhu, Andrew X.
    [J]. LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 39 (12) : 2214 - 2229
  • [9] Surgical Treatment of Hepatocholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review
    Gentile, Damiano
    Donadon, Matteo
    Lleo, Ana
    Aghemo, Alessio
    Roncalli, Massimo
    di Tommaso, Luca
    Torzilli, Guido
    [J]. LIVER CANCER, 2020, 9 (01) : 15 - 27
  • [10] Combining serum AFP and CEUS LI-RADS for better diagnostic performance in Chinese high-risk patients
    Gong, Wushuang
    Wu, Jiaqi
    Wei, Hong
    Jiang, Zhaopeng
    Wan, Ming
    Wu, Chengwei
    Xue, Weili
    Ma, Rao
    Zhou, Xianli
    Zhou, Hang
    [J]. RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2023, 128 (04): : 393 - 401