Development and External Validation of a Motor Intention-Integrated Prediction Model for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Intention-Driven Robotic Hand Training for Chronic Stroke

被引:0
作者
Hu, Chengpeng [1 ]
Ti, Chun Hang Eden [1 ]
Shi, Xiangqian [1 ]
Yuan, Kai [1 ]
Leung, Thomas W. H. [2 ]
Tong, Raymond Kai-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Biomed Engi neering, Shatin, Room 1120 11-F, William MW Mong Engn Bldg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med & Therapeut, Div Neurol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2025年 / 106卷 / 02期
关键词
Decision tree; Electromyography; Intention-driven robotic hand; Motor recovery; Prediction; Rehabilitation; Stroke rehabilitation; Upper extremity; ACTIVE FINGER EXTENSION; FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT; CORTICAL ACTIVATION; REHABILITATION; ARM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ALGORITHM; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; DEPENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.015
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To derive and validate a prediction model for minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in upper extremity (UE) motor function after intention-driven robotic hand training using residual voluntary electromyography (EMG) signals from affected UE. Design: A prospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study. We collected preintervention candidate predictors: demographics, clinical characteristics, Fugl-Meyer assessment of UE (FMAUE), Action Research Arm Test scores, and motor intention of flexor digitorum and extensor digitorum (ED) measured by EMG during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). For EMG measures, recognizing challenges for stroke survivors to move paralyzed hand, peak signals were extracted from 8 time windows during MVC-EMG (0.1-5s) to identify subjects' motor intention. Classification and regression tree algorithm was employed to predict survivors with MCID of FMAUE. Relationship between predictors and motor improvements was further investigated. Setting: Nine rehabilitation centers. Participants: Chronic stroke survivors (N=131), including 87 for derivation sample, and 44 for validation sample. Interventions: All participants underwent 20-session robotic hand training (40min/session, 3-5sessions/wk). Main Outcome Measures: Prediction efficacies of models were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The best effective model was final model and validated using AUC and overall accuracy. Results: The best model comprised FMAUE (cutoff score, 46) and peak activity of ED from 1-second MVC-EMG (MVC-EMG 4.604 times higher than resting EMG), which demonstrated significantly higher prediction accuracy (AUC, 0.807) than other time windows or solely using clinical scores (AUC, 0.595). In external validation, this model displayed robust prediction (AUC, 0.916). Significant quadratic relationship was observed between ED-EMG and FMAUE increases. Conclusions: This study presents a prediction model for intention-driven robotic hand training in chronic stroke survivors. It highlights significance of capturing motor intention through 1-second EMG window as a predictor for MCID improvement in UE motor function after 20-session robotic training. Survivors in 2 conditions showed high percentage of clinical motor improvement: moderate-to-high motor intention and low-to- moderate function; as well as high intention and high function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2025;106:206-15 (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 215
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Lawrence E.S., Coshall C., Dundas R., Et al., Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population, Stroke, 32, pp. 1279-1284, (2001)
  • [2] Cramer S.C., Nelles G., Benson R.R., Et al., A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke, Stroke, 28, pp. 2518-2527, (1997)
  • [3] Rensink M., Schuurmans M., Lindeman E., Hafsteinsdottir T., Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review, J Adv Nurs, 65, pp. 737-754, (2009)
  • [4] Schaechter J.D., Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke, Prog Neurobiol, 73, pp. 61-72, (2004)
  • [5] Blank A.A., French J.A., Pehlivan A.U., O'Malley M.K., Current trends in robot-assisted upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: promoting patient engagement in therapy, Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep, 2, pp. 184-195, (2014)
  • [6] Li S., Francisco G.E., Rymer W.Z., A new definition of poststroke spasticity and the interference of spasticity with motor recovery from acute to chronic stages, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 35, pp. 601-610, (2021)
  • [7] Hu X.L., Tong K.Y., Wei X.J., Rong W., Susanto E.A., Ho S.K., The effects of post-stroke upper-limb training with an electromyography (EMG)-driven hand robot, J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 23, pp. 1065-1074, (2013)
  • [8] Dimyan M.A., Harcum S., Ermer E., Et al., Baseline predictors of response to repetitive task practice in chronic stroke, Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 36, pp. 426-436, (2022)
  • [9] Susanto E.A., Tong R.K., Ockenfeld C., Ho N.S., Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial, J Neuroeng Rehabil, 12, (2015)
  • [10] Klamroth-Marganska V., Blanco J., Campen K., Et al., Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial, Lancet Neurol, 13, pp. 159-166, (2014)