Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Risk Comparison between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Artery Stenting with Distal Embolic Protection

被引:0
|
作者
Chow, Christopher Y. [1 ]
Kang, Naixin [1 ]
Kenel-Pierre, Stefan [1 ]
Gonzalez, Kathy [1 ]
Sussman, Matthew [1 ]
Rey, Jorge [1 ]
Velazquez, Omaida C. [1 ]
Bornak, Arash [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Vasc & Endovascular Surg, Miami, FL USA
关键词
ENDARTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.064
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a rare but serious complication after carotid artery revascularization. This study aims to determine the impact of carotid artery stenting (CAS) modality on the incidence, severity, and overall outcomes of CHS after carotid revascularization. Methods: Data from patients who underwent CAS with either distal embolic protection (CAS + DEP) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database through the years 2016-2023. Cases without embolic protection device and patients suffering from carotid dissection, trauma, or fibromuscular dysplasia were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified into asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups and then further reviewed based on the urgency of their revascularization. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CHS after revascularization. A subgroup analysis was then performed, evaluating postprocedural outcomes and severity of CHS. Lastly, patients with CHS were further analyzed according to the severity of their stroke on admission using the Results: In this analysis, a total of 69,480 (57.47% TCAR; 42.53% CAS + DEP) patients were included. Postprocedural CHS was lower in the TCAR cohort compared to the CAS + DEP cohort (0.53% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, TCAR was associated with lower risk of CHS than CAS + DEP (P < 0.001). When considering only asymptomatic patients, revascularization modality did not significantly affect CHS occurrence (P - 0.610). However, in symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with 2-fold lower risk of CHS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001), in both elective (P - 0.003), and urgent/emergency cases (P < 0.001). Among patients who developed CHS, those undergoing TCAR had decreased in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.94, P - 0.031) and at 30 days (aOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P - 0.006). TCAR patients with CHS also had a shorter length of hospitalization (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92, P - 0.022) and suffered less frequently from severe CHS with seizures and intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, P - 0.019). Patients undergoing CAS + DEP who were admitted with severe stroke (Modified Conclusion: In patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, TCAR is associated with a dergo TCAR express a milder form of CHS and have lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality than those treated with CAS + DEP.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Complications and Cost for Transfemoral Versus Transcarotid Stenting of Carotid Artery Stenosis
    Low, Matt
    Gray, Bruce H.
    Dicks, Andrew B.
    Ochiobi, Onyinyechi
    Blas, Joseph V. V.
    Gandhi, Sagar S.
    Carsten, Christopher G., III
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 89 : 1 - 10
  • [32] Distal embolic protection use during transfemoral carotid artery stenting is associated with improved in-hospital outcomes
    Wang, Sophie X.
    Marcaccio, Christina L.
    Patel, Priya B.
    Giles, Kristina A.
    Soden, Peter A.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Liang, Patric
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (06)
  • [33] Immunohistochemical Analysis of Debris Captured by Filter-Type Distal Embolic Protection Devices for Carotid Artery Stenting
    Kambayashi, Yukinao
    Yuki, Ichiro
    Ishibashi, Toshihiro
    Ikemura, Ayako
    Umezawa, Takashi
    Suzuki, Masafumi
    Kan, Issei
    Takao, Hiroyuki
    Murayama, Yuichi
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 26 (04) : 816 - 822
  • [34] Comparison of periprocedural and long term outcomes of proximal versus distal cerebral protection method during carotid artery stenting
    Gul, Zeynep Bastug
    Akkaya, Emre
    Vuruskan, Ertan
    Akgul, Ozgur
    Pusuroglu, Hamdi
    Surgit, Ozgur
    Ozyilmaz, Sinem Ozbay
    Tosu, Aydin Rodi
    Cakmak, Huseyin Altug
    Gode, Safa
    Gul, Mehmet
    VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 44 (04) : 297 - 304
  • [35] Cerebral Protection for Carotid Artery Stenting: Safety, Efficacy and Limitations
    Leu, Steve
    Chang, Wen-Neng
    Chen, Shu-Fang
    Yip, Hon-Kan
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2009, 25 (04) : 177 - 182
  • [36] Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: A network meta-analysis
    Giannopoulos, Stefanos
    Sagris, Marios
    Giannopoulos, Spyridon
    Tzoumas, Andreas
    Kokkinidis, Damianos G.
    Texakalidis, Pavlos
    Koutsias, George
    Volteas, Panagiotis
    Jing, Li
    Malgor, Rafael D.
    VASCULAR, 2024, 32 (02) : 447 - 457
  • [37] Effect of perioperative blood pressure variability on cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting: A retrospective study
    He, Guo-Yong
    Li, Yan-Hua
    Wei, Jun-Jie
    Xiao, Ji-Dong
    Chen, Yuan
    Fan, Bing-Lin
    Zhong, Wei-Zhang
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (06) : 702 - 707
  • [38] Evaluating postoperative outcomes in patients with hostile neck anatomy undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting
    Khan, Maryam Ali
    Abdelkarim, Ahmed
    Elsayed, Nadin
    Chow, Christopher Yu
    Cajas-Monson, Luis
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (01) : 191 - 200
  • [39] How to identify risk for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization procedures
    Radak, Djordje M.
    Sevkovic, Milorad
    Babic, Srdjan
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2019, 76 (08) : 834 - 838
  • [40] Evaluation of proximal protection devices during carotid artery stenting as the first choice for embolic protection
    Hornung, Marius
    Bertog, Stefan C.
    Franke, Jennifer
    Id, Dani
    Grunwald, Iris
    Sievert, Horst
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2015, 10 (11) : 1362 - 1367