Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Risk Comparison between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Artery Stenting with Distal Embolic Protection

被引:0
|
作者
Chow, Christopher Y. [1 ]
Kang, Naixin [1 ]
Kenel-Pierre, Stefan [1 ]
Gonzalez, Kathy [1 ]
Sussman, Matthew [1 ]
Rey, Jorge [1 ]
Velazquez, Omaida C. [1 ]
Bornak, Arash [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Vasc & Endovascular Surg, Miami, FL USA
关键词
ENDARTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.064
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is a rare but serious complication after carotid artery revascularization. This study aims to determine the impact of carotid artery stenting (CAS) modality on the incidence, severity, and overall outcomes of CHS after carotid revascularization. Methods: Data from patients who underwent CAS with either distal embolic protection (CAS + DEP) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) were obtained from the Vascular Quality Initiative database through the years 2016-2023. Cases without embolic protection device and patients suffering from carotid dissection, trauma, or fibromuscular dysplasia were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified into asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis groups and then further reviewed based on the urgency of their revascularization. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CHS after revascularization. A subgroup analysis was then performed, evaluating postprocedural outcomes and severity of CHS. Lastly, patients with CHS were further analyzed according to the severity of their stroke on admission using the Results: In this analysis, a total of 69,480 (57.47% TCAR; 42.53% CAS + DEP) patients were included. Postprocedural CHS was lower in the TCAR cohort compared to the CAS + DEP cohort (0.53% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, TCAR was associated with lower risk of CHS than CAS + DEP (P < 0.001). When considering only asymptomatic patients, revascularization modality did not significantly affect CHS occurrence (P - 0.610). However, in symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with 2-fold lower risk of CHS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.68, P < 0.001), in both elective (P - 0.003), and urgent/emergency cases (P < 0.001). Among patients who developed CHS, those undergoing TCAR had decreased in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.94, P - 0.031) and at 30 days (aOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.80, P - 0.006). TCAR patients with CHS also had a shorter length of hospitalization (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.92, P - 0.022) and suffered less frequently from severe CHS with seizures and intracranial hemorrhage (aOR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, P - 0.019). Patients undergoing CAS + DEP who were admitted with severe stroke (Modified Conclusion: In patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, TCAR is associated with a dergo TCAR express a milder form of CHS and have lower in-hospital and 30-day mortality than those treated with CAS + DEP.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elective carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection
    Durmaz, Hasanali
    Ergun, Onur
    Birgi, Erdem
    Dayanir, Hakan
    Conkbayir, Isik
    Hekimoglu, Saki
    NEUROLOGY ASIA, 2020, 25 (03) : 253 - 262
  • [2] Comparison of dual protection and distal filter protection as a distal embolic protection method during carotid artery stenting: a single-center carotid artery stenting experience
    Kajihara, Yosuke
    Sakamoto, Shigeyuki
    Kiura, Yoshihiro
    Mukada, Kazutoshi
    Chaki, Takahiro
    Kajihara, Shiro
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 38 (04) : 671 - 676
  • [3] Anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization and transfemoral carotid artery stenting
    Wu, Winona W.
    Liang, Patric
    O'Donnell, Thomas F. X.
    Swerdlow, Nicholas J.
    Li, Chun
    Wyers, Mark C.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (05) : 1452 - 1460
  • [4] Contemporary Review of Embolic Distal Protection Strategies in Carotid Artery Stenting
    Lam, Russell C.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 21 (08) : 413 - 414
  • [5] Randomized Comparison of Distal and Proximal Cerebral Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting
    Cano, Manuel N.
    Kambara, Antonio M.
    de Cano, Silvia J. F.
    Pezzi Portela, Luiz Antonio
    Tavares, Angela
    Ribamar Costa, J., Jr.
    Cunha Abizaid, Alexandre Antonio
    Moreira, Samuel Martins
    Sousa, Amanda G. M. R.
    Eduardo Moraes Rego Sousa, J.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 6 (11) : 1203 - 1209
  • [6] Neurosonological Parameters May Predict the Risk of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Carotid Artery Stenting
    Xu, Min
    Yan, Peng
    Zhao, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Hailing
    Sun, Qinjian
    Du, Yifeng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 187 : E77 - E85
  • [7] Learning curve and proficiency of transcarotid artery revascularization compared to transfemoral carotid artery stenting
    Kumins, Norman H.
    Kashyap, Vikram S.
    SEMINARS IN VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 33 (1-2) : 16 - 23
  • [8] Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome resulting in subarachnoid hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting
    Isozaki, Makoto
    Arai, Yoshikazu
    Higashino, Yoshifumi
    Okazawa, Hidehiko
    Kikuta, Ken-ichiro
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 30 (09) : 669 - 674
  • [9] Near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery stenting predicts cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome
    Matsumoto, S.
    Nakahara, I.
    Higashi, T.
    Iwamuro, Y.
    Watanabe, Y.
    Takahashi, K.
    Ando, M.
    Takezawa, M.
    Kira, J. -I.
    NEUROLOGY, 2009, 72 (17) : 1512 - 1518
  • [10] Association of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization vs Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting With Stroke or Death Among Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Liang, Patric
    Eldrup-Jorgensen, Jens
    Cronenwett, Jack L.
    Nolan, Brian W.
    Kashyap, Vikram S.
    Wang, Grace J.
    Motaganahalli, Raghu L.
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (23): : 2313 - 2322