EvolveUI: User Interfaces that Evolve with User Proficiency

被引:0
作者
Saif, Ali [1 ]
Zakir, Mohammad Taha [2 ]
Raza, Agha Ali [2 ]
Naseem, Mustafa [3 ]
机构
[1] Aitchisons Coll, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Lahore Univ Management Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING AND SUSTAINABLE SOCIETIES 2024, COMPASS 2024 | 2024年
关键词
user experience design; mobile applications; illiteracy; adaptive user interfaces;
D O I
10.1145/3674829.3675078
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recent studies have highlighted the challenges low-literacy users face with complex user interfaces, often preventing them from utilizing essential smartphone applications for an improved quality of life. This paper introduces the EvolveUI design approach that diverges from conventional interface design by evolving in complexity alongside a user's growing proficiency. Initially presenting a single navigation point to simplify interaction, EvolveUI systematically expands, introducing more features and navigation points as users become more adept at interacting with the interface. We build upon previous adaptive user interface research by uniquely focusing on expanding functionality based on user proficiency, offering a tailored experience that aligns with individual learning curves. By conceptualizing the interface as a dynamically expanding hierarchy, starting as a minimalist "tree" and unfolding into a more complex structure, EvolveUI facilitates a more accessible and engaging user experience. Our study compares this evolving interface approach with conventional designs through usability tests on a mobile health application, demonstrating EvolveUI's potential to enhance technology accessibility for low-literacy users and suggesting new directions for inclusive design practices.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 237
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] AndrewSears Ben, 1994, ACM Transactions on ComputerHuman Interaction (TOCHI), V1, P27, DOI [10.1145/174630.174632, DOI 10.1145/174630.174632]
  • [2] An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale
    Bangor, Aaron
    Kortum, Philip T.
    Miller, James T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2008, 24 (06) : 574 - 594
  • [3] Bangor A, 2009, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P114
  • [4] Brooke J., 1996, Usability evaluation in industry, V189, P4, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781498710411-35
  • [5] Chaudry Beenish M., 2012, P 2 ACM SIGHIT INT H, P91, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2110363.2110377, 10.1145/2110363.2110377]
  • [6] Cockburn A, 2007, CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1 AND 2, P627
  • [7] Cuendet Sebastien., 2013, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, page, P2833, DOI DOI 10.1145/2470654.2481392
  • [8] Dew Kristin, 2013, CHI 13 EXTENDED ABST, P25
  • [9] Findlater L, 2009, CHI2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, P1655
  • [10] Findlater Leah., 2004, P SIGCHI C HUMAN FAC, P89, DOI DOI 10.1145/985692.985704