Examining generation Z's use of generative AI from an affordance-based approach

被引:0
作者
Lee, Chei Sian [1 ]
Tan, Li En [1 ]
Goh, Dion Hoe-Lian [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore, Wee Kim Wee Sch Commun & Informat, Singapore, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.47989/ir30iConf47083
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Introduction. This paper uses the affordances framework to investigate how Generation Z (GenZ) students in higher education use generative AI (GenAI). There is an increasing need to gain a deeper understanding of GenZ's interaction with artificial intelligence tools to better support their integration into higher education and the workforce. Method. Data was collated from semi-structured interviews with 34 GenZ students in higher education. Analysis. Thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data collected from the semi-structured interviews. Results. The findings suggest GenZ students have seamlessly integrated GenAI into diverse aspects of their lives. This study highlighted three main GenAI affordances that resonate with GenZ students: a) content searching and curation b) content generation and ideation, and c) content enhancement and refinement, revealing new opportunities for information access. Conclusions. This study shed light on the perceived affordances of GenAI for GenZs, addressing a gap in the current literature on GenAI. The findings underscore the significant extent to which GenAI has been integrated into GenZ students' daily lives. Our study contributes to a better understanding of how GenAI's affordances facilitate and support GenZ students, providing invaluable insights that can inform future policies on developing literacy for AI use tailored to this group.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1102
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Qual Res Psychol, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]
[2]   The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? [J].
Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk ;
Lee, Katherine K. W. .
SMART LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 10 (01)
[3]  
Davis J. L., 2020, How artefacts afford: The power and politics of everyday things
[4]  
Dennen V. P., 2024, P INT C NETW LEARN, V13, DOI [10.54337/nlc.v13.8546, DOI 10.54337/NLC.V13.8546]
[5]  
Duffy C., 2024, CNN,August 2
[6]  
Gibson J. J., 1986, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
[7]  
Giunta C., 2017, Archives of Business Research, V5, P90, DOI [DOI 10.14738/ABR.54, 10.14738/abr.54.2962, DOI 10.14738/ABR.54.2962]
[8]   Negotiating change: Transition as a central concept for information literacy [J].
Hicks, Alison .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2022, 48 (02) :210-222
[9]   Artificial intelligence in the information ecosystem: Affordances for everyday information seeking [J].
Hirvonen, Noora ;
Jylha, Ville ;
Lao, Yucong ;
Larsson, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 75 (10) :1152-1165
[10]   Student information use during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Howard, Heather A. ;
Bochenek, Annette ;
Mayhook, Zoeanna ;
Trowbridge, Trena ;
Lux, Steven .
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2023, 49 (03)