Design, development and performance evaluation of a miniature electrostatic precipitator in an indoor environment

被引:0
作者
Kumar, Aiswarya [1 ]
Nawale, Prashant [1 ]
Sahu, Manoranjan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Environm Sci & Engn Dept, Aerosol & Nanoparticle Technol Lab, Mumbai 400076, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Interdisciplinary Program Climate Studies, Mumbai 400076, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Machine Intelligence & Data Sci, Mumbai 400076, India
关键词
Standard aerosols; Real scenario; Major PM sources; By-product; Energy consumed/CADR; PARTICULATE MATTER; OUTDOOR CONCENTRATIONS; PARTICLES; SUBMICRON; FINE; GENERATION; EFFICIENCY; EXPOSURES; DYNAMICS; SMOKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.elstat.2025.104038
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Indoor air quality is a major concern in the modern environment. Although various pollutants coexist indoors, particulate matter (PM) is a major health concern. Even though different PM capture technologies are available in market as well as on lab scale, they pose several drawbacks. It was in this regard that electrostatic precipitator (ESP), a widely preferred technology for industrial application but has yet to be explored to that extent in indoor environments could provide multiple benefits in latter. Therefore, a miniature single-wire, single-stage and wire- plate square cross-sectional ESP was designed in laboratory and operated at optimal operating conditions based on theoretical calculations, experimental results as well as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling to obtain maximised capture of PM. Results from study confirmed that designed ESP was capable of capturing various standard aerosols such as sodium chloride, ammonium chloride and magnesium chloride with a total removal efficiency of 99.94 %-99.97 % in wide PM sizes from 10 nm to 800 nm. To simulate performance in a real scenario, experiments were also performed with major indoor PM sources like incense sticks, candle burning and mosquito coils having different particle number distributions and achieved a total PM capture efficiency of 99.24, 99.99 and 99.97 % respectively. Designed ESP also removed ambient air as well as infiltrated PM from outdoors with a total efficiency of 97.87 % and 99.74 % respectively. Additionally, energy consumed/clean air delivery rate (CADR) (0.32 W/(m3/hr)) and emission of by-products like ultrafine particles as well as nitrogen dioxide were found to be comparatively lesser compared to commercial purifiers suggesting its possible applicability in scaling up as an indoor air purifier.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [31] Tanski M., Berendt A., Mizeraczyk J., Closed SDBD-driven two-stage electrostatic precipitator, J. Clean. Prod., 226, pp. 74-84, (2019)
  • [32] Waring M.S., Siegel J.A., Corsi R.L., Ultrafine particle removal and generation by portable air cleaners, Atmos. Environ., 42, 20, pp. 5003-5014, (2008)
  • [33] Bedmutha R.J., Ferrante L., Briens C., Berruti F., Inculet I., Single and two-stage electrostatic demisters for biomass pyrolysis application, Chem. Eng. Process, 48, 6, pp. 1112-1120, (2009)
  • [34] Sahu V., Elumalai S.P., Gautam S., Singh N.K., Singh P., Characterization of indoor settled dust and investigation of indoor air quality in different micro-environments, Int. J. Environ. Health Res., 28, 4, pp. 419-431, (2018)
  • [35] Cheng K.-C., Park H.-K., Tetteh A.O., Zheng D., Ouellette N.T., Nadeau K.C., Hildemann L.M., Mixing and sink effects of air purifiers on indoor PM2.5 concentrations: a pilot study of eight residential homes in Fresno, California, Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 50, 8, pp. 835-845, (2016)
  • [36] Khandelwal N., Tiwari R., Saini R., Taneja A., Particulate and trace metal emission from mosquito coil and cigarette burning in environmental chamber, SN Appl. Sci., 1, 5, (2019)
  • [37] Samek L., Stegowski Z., Styszko K., Furman L., Fiedor J., Seasonal contribution of assessed sources to submicron and fine particulate matter in a Central European urban area, Environ. Pollut., 241, pp. 406-411, (2018)
  • [38] Wheeler A.J., Wallace L.A., Kearney J., Van Ryswyk K., You H., Kulka R., Brook J.R., Xu X., Personal, indoor, and outdoor concentrations of fine and ultrafine particles using continuous monitors in multiple residences, Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 45, 9, pp. 1078-1089, (2011)
  • [39] Zheng C., Wu Z., Shen Z., Zhang H., Wang Y., Gao W., Shao L., Wu W., Gao X., Particle capture in a high-temperature electrostatic precipitator with different electrode configurations, Powder Technol., 372, pp. 84-93, (2020)
  • [40] Chithra V.S., Shiva Nagendra S.M., Chemical and morphological characteristics of indoor and outdoor particulate matter in an urban environment, Atmos. Environ., 77, pp. 579-587, (2013)