Institutional analysis of water governance in the Colorado River Basin, 1922-2022

被引:1
作者
Lawless, Krista L. [1 ]
Garcia, Margaret [2 ]
White, Dave D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Human Evolut & Social Change, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Global Inst Sustainabil & Innovat, Tempe, AZ USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN WATER | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
Colorado River Basin; institutional analysis; network analysis; path dependency; water governance; water management; PATH DEPENDENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE; INCREASING RETURNS; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; POLICY; POWER;
D O I
10.3389/frwa.2024.1451854
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The 1922 Colorado River Compact started the long history of water governance in the Colorado River Basin. Over the last century, the institutional structure has shaped water governance in the basin. However, an understanding of the long-term evolution is lacking. This study examines how water management strategies have evolved at the basin scale by incorporating institutional, temporal, and network structure analysis methods to examine long-term changes. Content analysis was employed to systematically investigate encouraged and/or discouraged water management actions at different rule levels. The water governance network was examined at four points in time to map the institutional structure, actors, and governance level at which rules are issued and targeted. Using institutional analysis, we found constitutional, operational, and collective-choice level rules for water supply, storage, movement, and use have been altered via layering of new governance rules without major rule or responsibility alteration. The network analysis results indicate that key decision-making positions have remained and actors who issue and are targeted by the rules lack significant change. We found original positions of power have been maintained, potentially stagnating the space for problem-solving and management strategy renegotiation. Our results indicate that path dependency has shaped water governance and who is able to influence decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 167 条
  • [11] COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS
    ARTHUR, WB
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) : 116 - 131
  • [12] Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the 'old' and 'new' policy idioms
    Arts, B
    Van Tatenhove, J
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 2004, 37 (3-4) : 339 - 356
  • [13] Bardach E., 2006, Policy dynamics, P336
  • [14] Indian water rights settlements and water management innovations: The role of the Arizona Water Settlements Act
    Bark, Rosalind H.
    Jacobs, Katharine L.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
  • [15] Barnard C.I., 1968, FUNCT EXECUTIVE, V11
  • [16] When will Lake Mead go dry?
    Barnett, Tim P.
    Pierce, David W.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (03)
  • [17] Berggren J., 2018, Transitioning to a New Era in Western United States Water Governance: Examining Sustainable and Equitable Water Policy in the Colorado River Basin
  • [18] Utilizing sustainability criteria to evaluate river basin decision-making: the case of the Colorado River Basin
    Berggren, John
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2018, 18 (06) : 1621 - 1632
  • [19] Multilevel governance of coastal flood risk reduction: A public finance perspective
    Bisaro, Alexander
    de Bel, Mark
    Hinkel, Jochen
    Kok, Sien
    Stojanovic, Tim
    Ware, Daniel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 112 : 203 - 212
  • [20] The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?
    Bodin, Orjan
    Crona, Beatrice I.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2009, 19 (03): : 366 - 374