Institutional analysis of water governance in the Colorado River Basin, 1922-2022

被引:1
作者
Lawless, Krista L. [1 ]
Garcia, Margaret [2 ]
White, Dave D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Human Evolut & Social Change, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Global Inst Sustainabil & Innovat, Tempe, AZ USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN WATER | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
Colorado River Basin; institutional analysis; network analysis; path dependency; water governance; water management; PATH DEPENDENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE; INCREASING RETURNS; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; POLICY; POWER;
D O I
10.3389/frwa.2024.1451854
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The 1922 Colorado River Compact started the long history of water governance in the Colorado River Basin. Over the last century, the institutional structure has shaped water governance in the basin. However, an understanding of the long-term evolution is lacking. This study examines how water management strategies have evolved at the basin scale by incorporating institutional, temporal, and network structure analysis methods to examine long-term changes. Content analysis was employed to systematically investigate encouraged and/or discouraged water management actions at different rule levels. The water governance network was examined at four points in time to map the institutional structure, actors, and governance level at which rules are issued and targeted. Using institutional analysis, we found constitutional, operational, and collective-choice level rules for water supply, storage, movement, and use have been altered via layering of new governance rules without major rule or responsibility alteration. The network analysis results indicate that key decision-making positions have remained and actors who issue and are targeted by the rules lack significant change. We found original positions of power have been maintained, potentially stagnating the space for problem-solving and management strategy renegotiation. Our results indicate that path dependency has shaped water governance and who is able to influence decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 167 条
  • [1] Toward the adaptive governance of transboundary water resources
    Akamani, Kofi
    Wilson, Patrick Impero
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2011, 4 (06): : 409 - 416
  • [2] Allan T., 2003, Occas. Pap, V50, P1
  • [3] Knowledge infrastructure and safe operating spaces in social-ecological systems
    Anderies, John M.
    Mathias, Jean-Denis
    Janssen, Marco A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (12) : 5277 - 5284
  • [4] Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems: Implications for Public Policy
    Anderies, John M.
    Janssen, Marco A.
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2013, 41 (03) : 513 - 536
  • [5] Prior appropriation and water planning reform in Montana's Yellowstone River Basin: path dependency or boundary object?
    Anderson, Matthew B.
    Ward, Lucas C.
    Gilbertz, Susan J.
    McEvoy, Jamie
    Hall, Damon M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2018, 20 (02) : 198 - 213
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2012, COLORADO RIVER BASIN
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2007, Record of Decision: Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and the Coordinated Operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2002, The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change. Fit, Interplay
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2007, Colorado River Basin Water Management: Evaluating and Adjusting to Hydroclimatic variability
  • [10] Arizona Superior Court, 2024, Little Colorado River adjudication. Arizona General Stream Adjudication Bulletin