Exploring artificial intelligence literacy and the use of ChatGPT and copilot in instruction on nursing academic report writing

被引:0
|
作者
Tseng, Li-Ping [1 ]
Huang, Li-Ping [2 ]
Chen, Wei-Ru [3 ]
机构
[1] St Martin De Porres Hosp, Sisters our Lady China Catholic Med Fdn, Dept Management Ctr, 565,Sec 2,Daya RD, Chiayi 60069, Taiwan
[2] Chung Jen Jr Coll Nursing, Dept Nursing, Hlth Sci & Management, 1-10 Da-Hu, Chia Yi County 62241, Taiwan
[3] Chaoyang Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, 168 Gifeng E Rd, Taichung 413310, Taiwan
关键词
Artificial intelligence literacy; Nursing education; ChatGPT; Copilot; Academic report writing; Scaffolding teaching; Artificial intelligence;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106570
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Nursing education increasingly emphasizes academic writing and communication, critical for delivering quality patient care and professional advancement. Rapidly emerging artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and Copilot are transforming educational methodologies, and a focus is being placed on embedding AI literacy to effectively bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. These technologies have the potential to reshape nursing education in a technology-driven health-care landscape. Aim: This study investigated the effectiveness of AI literacy and the application of ChatGPT and Copilot in academic nursing report writing. It assessed the level of AI literacy of nursing students, examined the integration of basic AI concepts into a curriculum, and analyzed the impact of these tools compared with traditional teaching methods. Methods: The study adopted a sample of 203 senior nursing students from Southern Taiwan to compare an AIenhanced teaching approach using ChatGPT and Copilot with conventional methods. The curriculum, centered on the "Writing Case Reports and Seminars" course, employed the Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate model and incorporated scaffolding techniques to synergistically integrate clinical skills with academic learning. AI literacy was measured using the Meta AI Literacy Scale (MAILS). Summative assessments, adhering to the Taiwan Nursing Association standards, focused on individual and group case report evaluations. Findings: Following an 18-week AI intervention, the experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in all dimensions of the MAILS. A ChatGPT usage of 100 % was found, with a notable enhancement discovered in the "Nursing Plan" section of case reports. Although the experimental group outperformed the control group in overall case report evaluations, the connections between identified problems and proposed plans were weaker and nursing interventions tended to be less individualized for the experimental group. Conclusions: The incorporation of AI tools such as ChatGPT and Copilot into a scaffolding teaching framework significantly boosted students' AI literacy and performance in summative assessments. Effective AI training for students, supervised use of these tools, and continuous professional development for educators are paramount to successful implementation. Addressing the current limitations of AI has the potential to further improve academic writing, foster critical thinking, and ensure responsible application in patient care, ultimately leading to higher-quality and more effective nursing education.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence and its Impact on Academic Literacy: A Systematic Review
    Baldrich, Kevin
    do Minguez-Oller, Juana celia
    Garcia-Roca, Anastasio
    EDUCATIO SIGLO XXI, 2024, 42 (03): : 53 - 74
  • [22] Artificial intelligence in bibliographic searches in scientific databases: comparing search expressions in ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini
    Picalho, Antonio Carlos
    de Oliveira, Gisele Rosa
    Cativelli, Adriana Stefani
    RDBCI-REVISTA DIGITAL DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2025, 23
  • [23] The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing
    Tang, Arthur
    Li, Kin-Kit
    Kwok, Kin On
    Cao, Liujiao
    Luong, Stanley
    Tam, Wilson
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2024, 56 (02) : 314 - 318
  • [24] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A LEXICOGRAPHICAL TOOL: ANALYTICAL STUDY ON THE PERFORMANCE OF CHATGPT, COPILOT, AND GEMINI IN SPANISH LEXICAL UNITS
    Moran, Ma Teresa Fuentes
    Santana, Fermin Dominguez
    Rodriguez, Crispulo Travieso
    RLA-REVISTA DE LINGUISTICA TEORICA Y APLICADA, 2024, 62 (01): : 13 - 38
  • [25] Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT: Exploring Current and potential future roles in marketing education
    Mcalister, Anna R.
    Alhabash, Saleem
    Yang, Jing
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 30 (02) : 166 - 187
  • [26] ChatGPT in orthopedics: a narrative review exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in orthopedic practice
    Giorgino, Riccardo
    Alessandri-Bonetti, Mario
    Luca, Andrea
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Rossi, Nicolo
    Peretti, Giuseppe M.
    Mangiavini, Laura
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [27] Generative artificial intelligence and academic writing: an analysis of the perceptions of researchers in training
    Pereira, Ricardo
    Reis, Ingrid Weingartner
    Ulbricht, Vania
    dos Santos, Neri
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH-THE JOURNAL OF THE IBEROAMERICAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT, 2024, 22 (04) : 429 - 450
  • [28] Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease: Take ChatGPT as an Example
    Kunming Cheng
    Zhiyong Li
    Yongbin He
    Qiang Guo
    Yanqiu Lu
    Shuqin Gu
    Haiyang Wu
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 51 : 1130 - 1135
  • [29] Can ChatGPT be an author? A study of artificial intelligence authorship policies in top academic journals
    Lund, Brady D.
    Naheem, K. T.
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2024, 37 (01) : 13 - 21
  • [30] Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease: Take ChatGPT as an Example
    Cheng, Kunming
    Li, Zhiyong
    He, Yongbin
    Guo, Qiang
    Lu, Yanqiu
    Gu, Shuqin
    Wu, Haiyang
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 51 (06) : 1130 - 1135