Protected areas shape the distribution of tourism across rural Europe

被引:0
作者
Seguin, Raphael [1 ]
Delbar, Vincent [2 ]
Batista e Silva, Filipe [3 ]
Mouillot, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, MARBEC, CNRS, IFREMER,IRD, Montpellier, France
[2] La TeleScop, Montpellier, France
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
关键词
biodiversity; conservation; Europe; protected areas; tourism; IMPACTS; BIODIVERSITY; LAND; RECREATION; PEOPLE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10700
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Protected areas (PAs) have expanded rapidly in recent decades to help mitigate the ongoing biodiversity crisis but are under increasing human pressures that jeopardize their conservation effectiveness. Tourism in PAs may galvanize efforts towards biodiversity conservation, but it can also be a major source of threats, leading to multiple adverse social and ecological impacts. Considering the recent Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which aims to protect at least 30% of terrestrial ecosystems by 2030, understanding and assessing how and which PAs shape the spatial distribution of tourism is of great importance to biodiversity management and policy. In this study, we used a geospatial data set that describes the location and capacity of tourism accommodation in 81,185 local administrative units (LAUs) covering over 28 countries across rural Europe. After estimating the number of nights spent per LAU, we modelled the influence of PAs on the distribution of tourism throughout Europe while controlling for other social, economic and environmental covariates, but also for spatial autocorrelation. We reveal a positive link between highly protected PAs and the number of nights spent by tourists in LAUs. The attractiveness of these PAs for tourists may pose a conservation paradox, that is, highly protected PAs, which aim to safeguard nature tend to attract a disproportionate number of tourists, which may lead to nature degradation.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Les aires prot & eacute;g & eacute;es (AP) se sont multipli & eacute;es au cours des derni & egrave;res d & eacute;cennies pour att & eacute;nuer la crise de l'& eacute;rosion de la biodiversit & eacute;. Cependant, elles subissent des pressions humaines croissantes qui menacent leur efficacit & eacute;. Le tourisme dans les AP peut renforcer les efforts de conservation de la biodiversit & eacute;, mais il peut & eacute;galement repr & eacute;senter une source majeure de menaces, entra & icirc;nant divers impacts sociaux et & eacute;cologiques n & eacute;gatifs. & Agrave; la lumi & egrave;re du Cadre mondial de la biodiversit & eacute; de Kunming-Montr & eacute;al, qui vise & agrave; prot & eacute;ger au moins 30% des & eacute;cosyst & egrave;mes terrestres d'ici 2030, il est crucial de comprendre et d'& eacute;valuer comment les aires prot & eacute;g & eacute;es influencent la r & eacute;partition spatiale du tourisme, afin de mettre en oe uvre des mesures de gestion de la biodiversit & eacute; efficaces. Cette & eacute;tude utilise des donn & eacute;es g & eacute;ospatiales sur la localisation et la capacit & eacute; d'h & eacute;bergement touristique dans 81,185 unit & eacute;s administratives locales (UAL) de plus de 28 pays de l'Europe rurale. En estimant le nombre de nuits pass & eacute;es par UAL, nous avons mod & eacute;lis & eacute; l'influence des aires prot & eacute;g & eacute;es sur la distribution du tourisme en Europe, tout en contr & ocirc;lant d'autres variables sociales, & eacute;conomiques et environnementales, et en tenant compte de l'autocorr & eacute;lation spatiale. Nous avons mis en & eacute;vidence un lien positif entre les aires hautement prot & eacute;g & eacute;es et le nombre de nuits pass & eacute;es par les touristes dans les UAL. L'attrait de ces aires prot & eacute;g & eacute;es pour les touristes pr & eacute;sente un paradoxe en mati & egrave;re de conservation: bien que ces zones visent & agrave; prot & eacute;ger la nature, leur popularit & eacute; touristique peut entra & icirc;ner une d & eacute;gradation de l'environnement.
引用
收藏
页码:2246 / 2260
页数:15
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] Impacts of human recreation on carnivores in protected areas
    Baker, Angela Darnell
    Leberg, Paul L.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [2] Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas
    Balmford, Andrew
    Green, Jonathan M. H.
    Anderson, Michael
    Beresford, James
    Huang, Charles
    Naidoo, Robin
    Walpole, Matt
    Manica, Andrea
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2015, 13 (02):
  • [3] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [4] Analysing spatiotemporal patterns of tourism in Europe at high-resolution with conventional and big data sources
    Batista e Silva, Filipe
    Herrera, Mario Alberto Marin
    Rosina, Konstantin
    Barranco, Ricardo Ribeiro
    Freire, Sergio
    Schiavina, Marcello
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 68 : 101 - 115
  • [5] Tropical protected areas reduced deforestation carbon emissions by one third from 2000-2012
    Bebber, Daniel P.
    Butt, Nathalie
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [6] Decarbonising tourism: mission impossible?
    Becken, Susanne
    [J]. TOURISM RECREATION RESEARCH, 2019, 44 (04) : 419 - 433
  • [7] Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Di Franco, Antonio
    Calo, Antonio
    Nether, Elizabeth
    Niccolini, Federico
    Milazzo, Marco
    Guidetti, Paolo
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2019, 12 (04):
  • [8] Analysing spatial and temporal patterns of tourism and tourists' satisfaction in Nepal using social media
    Bhatt, Pragya
    Pickering, Catherine Marina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM-RESEARCH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 44
  • [9] Exploring the impacts of future tourism development on land use/cover changes
    Boavida-Portugal, Ines
    Rocha, Jorge
    Ferreira, Carlos C.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 77 : 82 - 91
  • [10] How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented?
    Bolam, Friederike C.
    Mair, Louise
    Angelico, Marco
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Burgman, Mark
    Hermes, Claudia
    Hoffmann, Michael
    Martin, Rob W.
    McGowan, Philip J. K.
    Rodrigues, Ana S. L.
    Rondinini, Carlo
    Westrip, James R. S.
    Wheatley, Hannah
    Bedolla-Guzman, Yuliana
    Calzada, Javier
    Child, Matthew F.
    Cranswick, Peter A.
    Dickman, Christopher R.
    Fessl, Birgit
    Fisher, Diana O.
    Garnett, Stephen T.
    Groombridge, Jim J.
    Johnson, Christopher N.
    Kennerley, Rosalind J.
    King, Sarah R. B.
    Lamoreux, John F.
    Lees, Alexander C.
    Lens, Luc
    Mahood, Simon P.
    Mallon, David P.
    Meijaard, Erik
    Mendez-Sanchez, Federico
    Percequillo, Alexandre Reis
    Regan, Tracey J.
    Renjifo, Luis Miguel
    Rivers, Malin C.
    Roach, Nicolette S.
    Roxburgh, Lizanne
    Safford, Roger J.
    Salaman, Paul
    Squires, Tom
    Vazquez-Dominguez, Ella
    Visconti, Piero
    Woinarski, John C. Z.
    Young, Richard P.
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2021, 14 (01):