Current Practices in Genetic Testing for Prostate Cancer: The Indian Scenario

被引:0
作者
Bakshi, Ganesh [1 ]
Rajappa, Senthil [2 ]
Joshi, Amit [3 ]
Desai, Chirag [4 ]
Addla, Sanjai [5 ]
Baxi, Hemang [6 ]
Talwar, Vineet [7 ]
Mohapatra, Prabrajya Narayan [8 ]
Shingla, Shivam [9 ]
Kulkarni, Utkarsha [10 ]
机构
[1] PD Hinduja Hosp & Med Res Ctr, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] Basavatarakam Indo Amer Canc Hosp & Res Inst, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[3] Tata Mem Hosp, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[4] Hemato Oncol Clin, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[5] Apollo Hosp, Apollo Hlth St,Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500096, Telangana, India
[6] HCG Canc Ctr, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[7] Rajeev Gandhi Canc Inst & Res Ctr, Delhi, India
[8] Apollo Canc Ctr, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
[9] Nanavati Max Super Special Hosp, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[10] AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd, Oncol, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
关键词
Genetic testing; germline testing; prostate cancer; somatic tumor testing; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; TUMOR-TISSUE; RISK; MUTATIONS; MEN;
D O I
10.4103/ijph.ijph_686_23
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Despite genetic testing being recommended by international guidelines for the selection of targeted therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), limited data are available on genetic testing for PCa in India. Objectives: The objective is to understand the current genetic testing practice pattern for PCa in India. Materials and Methods: A panel of 9 experts developed and validated a premeeting online questionnaire comprising 12 objective questions. The questionnaire was circulated from February 2022 to May 2022 among medical oncologists and uro-oncologists across pan-India, followed by response collection over 3 months. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results and concluding statements were formulated on current genetic testing practice patterns for PCa. Results: A total of 103 responses were received. Genetic testing was advised by 35.9% of the participants in <5% of patients with PCa. Patients with a family history of PCa (88.3%) were most commonly referred for genetic testing. Nearly half (50.2%) of the participants routinely tested for homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes; 52% used blood and tissue as the most preferred specimen for performing genetic testing and 44.7% followed the testing sequence of tumor tissue followed by blood. Major barriers to genetic testing were affordability and scarcity of genetic counselors, while a major change could be brought by making it cost-effective and improving access to medication. Conclusions: We observed a lower prescription frequency of genetic testing for the HRR gene across pan-India. Improving the quality and access to genetic testing and the availability of cost-effective-targeted therapies will aid in delivering personalized care to patients with metastatic PCa.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 400
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Epidemiology of prostate cancer: current status
    Tao, Z. -Q.
    Shi, A. -M.
    Wang, K. -X.
    Zhang, W. -D.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (05) : 805 - 812
  • [42] Genetic Contribution to Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Sokolova, Alexandra O.
    Obeid, Elias I.
    Cheng, Heather H.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 48 (03) : 349 - 363
  • [43] Genetic testing of sperm donors in China: a survey of current practices
    Huang, Chuan
    Wang, Qi-Lin
    Wu, Hui-Lan
    Huang, Zeng-Hui
    Zhang, Xin-Zong
    Zhu, Wen-Bing
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [44] Gaps in Public Awareness About BRCA and Genetic Testing in Prostate Cancer: Social Media Landscape Analysis
    Loeb, Stacy
    Massey, Philip
    Leader, Amy E.
    Thakker, Sameer
    Falge, Emily
    Taneja, Sabina
    Byrne, Nataliya
    Rose, Meredith
    Joy, Matthew
    Walter, Dawn
    Katz, Matthew S.
    Wong, Risa L.
    Selvan, Preethi
    Keith, Scott W.
    Giri, Veda N.
    JMIR CANCER, 2021, 7 (03):
  • [45] Mainstream germline genetic testing in men with metastatic prostate cancer: design and protocol for a multicenter observational study
    Vlaming, Michiel
    Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
    van Oort, Inge M. M.
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
    Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [46] Current Approaches to Germline Cancer Genetic Testing
    Stoffel, Elena M.
    Carethers, John M.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 71, 2020, 2020, 71 : 85 - 102
  • [47] Guidelines for genetic testing in prostate cancer: a scoping review
    Tuffaha, Haitham
    Edmunds, Kim
    Fairbairn, David
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    Chambers, Suzanne
    Smith, David P.
    Horvath, Lisa
    Arora, Shiksha
    Scuffham, Paul
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024, 27 (04) : 594 - 603
  • [48] Utilization of genetic testing in men with advanced prostate cancer
    Aguiar, Jonathan A.
    Li, Eric V.
    Siddiqui, Mohammad R.
    Soliman, Moataz A.
    Kumar, Sai K. S. R.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Keeter, Mary Kate
    Brown, C. Hendricks
    Szymaniak, Brittany M.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    PROSTATE, 2023, 83 (06) : 516 - 523
  • [49] Clinical Impact of a Rapid Genetic Testing Model for Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients
    Breen, Kelsey E.
    Symecko, Heather
    Spielman, Kelsey
    Gebert, Rebecca
    Shah, Ibrahim H.
    Pundock, Stacy
    Batson, Melissa
    Narayan, Vivek K.
    Stadler, Zsofia K.
    Autio, Karen A.
    Abida, Wassim
    Danila, Daniel C.
    Scher, Howard I.
    Morris, Michael J.
    Hamilton, Jada G.
    Robson, Mark E.
    Domchek, Susan M.
    Carlo, Maria I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 (05) : 918 - 927
  • [50] Current and Best Practices of Genetic Testing for Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young: Views of Professional Experts
    van der Zwaag, Angeli M.
    Weinreich, Stephanie S.
    Bosma, Astrid R.
    Rigter, Tessel
    Losekoot, Monique
    Henneman, Lidewij
    Cornel, Martina C.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2015, 18 (01) : 52 - 59