Views From State-Level Policy Actors About the US Federal Government COVID-19 Response

被引:1
作者
Jones, Jeff [1 ,2 ]
Barnhill, Anne
Esmonde, Katelyn [3 ]
Hutler, Brian [4 ]
Johns, Michaela [5 ]
Faden, Ruth [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Johns Hopkins Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Temple Univ, Dept Philosophy, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
COVID-19; Pandemic; Policy; Public health preparedness/response; Crisis response;
D O I
10.1089/hs.2023.0125
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The United States takes a federalist approach to pandemic responses while the bulk of pandemic powers sits at the state level. Thus, comprehensive accounts of how state health officials managed the crisis and how the federal government affected those efforts are needed to better understand the governmental response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This article reports the results of semistructured interviews with 29 state-level policy actors from 16 US states. Interviewees discussed multiple aspects of the US federal COVID-19 response that affected the response in their states, including communications with the public, intergovernmental communications, and federal actions regarding various aspects of health service preparedness including emergency funding, procurement, testing capacity, vaccine development and distribution, and data systems. This research enriches the discussion about US pandemic preparedness and response, and indicates that alignment of public communications across government levels, enhanced intergovernmental communication, inclusion of rural perspectives, and federal investment in and sustainment of health service preparedness are key factors that can improve future US pandemic responses.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19 [J].
Adolph, Christopher ;
Amano, Kenya ;
Bang-Jensen, Bree ;
Fullman, Nancy ;
Wilkerson, John .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2021, 46 (02) :211-233
[2]   COVID-19 and other pandemics require a coherent response strategy [J].
Baker, Michael G. ;
Durrheim, David ;
Hsu, Li Yang ;
Wilson, Nick .
LANCET, 2023, 401 (10373) :265-266
[3]   Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation [J].
Barua, Zapan ;
Barua, Sajib ;
Aktar, Salma ;
Kabir, Najma ;
Li, Mingze .
PROGRESS IN DISASTER SCIENCE, 2020, 8
[4]   Governing in a Polarized Era: Federalism and the Response of US State and Federal Governments to the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Birkland, Thomas A. ;
Taylor, Kristin ;
Crow, Deserai A. ;
DeLeo, Rob .
PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2021, 51 (04) :650-672
[5]  
Burwell SM., 2020, 78 COUNC FOR REL IND
[6]   Fighting COVID-19 in the United States with Federalism and Other Constitutional and Statutory Authority [J].
Cigler, Beverly A. .
PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2021, 51 (04) :673-692
[7]  
Covid Crisis Group, 2022, LESSONS COVID WAR IN
[8]   Designing and conducting tabletop exercises to assess public health preparedness for manmade and naturally occurring biological threats [J].
Dausey, David J. ;
Buehler, James W. ;
Lurie, Nicole .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 7 (1)
[9]  
Davis Maggie, 2023, J Emerg Manag, V21, P19, DOI 10.5055/jem.0772
[10]   Federalism, Intergovernmental Relationships, and Emergency Response: A Comparison of Australia and the United States [J].
Downey, Davia Cox ;
Myers, William M. .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 50 (6-7) :526-535