Psychological Underpinnings of Partisan Bias in Tie Formation on Social Media

被引:0
作者
Mosleh, Mohsen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Martel, Cameron [3 ]
Rand, David G. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, 1 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3JS, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Business Sch, Dept Management, Exeter, England
[3] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] MIT, Inst Data Syst & Soc, Cambridge, MA USA
[5] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA 02193 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
partisanship; social media; polarization; field experiment; intergroup behavior; PAROCHIAL ALTRUISM; INFORMATION; NEWS; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1037/xge0001662
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individuals preferentially reciprocate connections with copartisans versus counter-partisans online. However, the mechanisms underlying this partisan bias remain unclear. Do individuals simply prefer viewing politically congenial content, or do they additionally prefer socially connecting with copartisans? Is this driven by preference for in-party ties or distaste for out-party ties? In a Twitter (now called X) field experiment, we created bot accounts varying by partisanship and whether they identified as bots or humans. We randomly assigned Twitter users (N = 3,013) to be followed by one of these accounts. We found evidence for social motivation-users were much more likely to reciprocate links to copartisan relative to counter-partisan accounts when the accounts identified as humans versus bots. We also found evidence for both in-party preference and out-party dispreference-users were as likely to follow back copartisan accounts as they were unlikely to followback counter-partisan accounts, compared to politically neutral accounts. A follow-up survey experiment (N = 990) provides further evidence for distinct roles of issue polarization, out-party animosity, and in-party affinity in moderating follow-back decisions online.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 390
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [31] Groupthink
    [J]. IEEE Eng Manage Rev, 2008, 1 (36):
  • [32] Political ideology shapes the amplification of the accomplishments of disadvantaged vs. advantaged group members
    Kteily, Nour S.
    Rocklage, Matthew D.
    McClanahan, Kaylene
    Ho, Arnold K.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (05) : 1559 - 1568
  • [33] Blocking of counter-partisan accounts drives political assortment on Twitter
    Martel, Cameron
    Mosleh, Mohsen
    Yang, Qi
    Zaman, Tauhid
    Rand, David G.
    [J]. PNAS NEXUS, 2024, 3 (05):
  • [34] Mosleh M., 2023, INGROUP LOVE VS OUTG
  • [35] Mosleh M., 2024, TENDENCIES TRIADIC C
  • [36] Measuring exposure to misinformation from political elites on Twitter
    Mosleh, Mohsen
    Rand, David G.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [37] Field Experiments on Social Media
    Mosleh, Mohsen
    Pennycook, Gordon
    Rand, David G.
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 31 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [38] Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment
    Mosleh, Mohsen
    Martel, Cameron
    Eckles, Dean
    Rand, David G.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (07)
  • [39] Tweetment Effects on the Tweeted: Experimentally Reducing Racist Harassment
    Munger, Kevin
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2017, 39 (03) : 629 - 649
  • [40] Nissenbaum H, 2004, WASH LAW REV, V79, P119