Psychological Underpinnings of Partisan Bias in Tie Formation on Social Media

被引:0
作者
Mosleh, Mohsen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Martel, Cameron [3 ]
Rand, David G. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford Internet Inst, 1 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3JS, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Business Sch, Dept Management, Exeter, England
[3] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] MIT, Inst Data Syst & Soc, Cambridge, MA USA
[5] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA 02193 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
partisanship; social media; polarization; field experiment; intergroup behavior; PAROCHIAL ALTRUISM; INFORMATION; NEWS; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1037/xge0001662
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individuals preferentially reciprocate connections with copartisans versus counter-partisans online. However, the mechanisms underlying this partisan bias remain unclear. Do individuals simply prefer viewing politically congenial content, or do they additionally prefer socially connecting with copartisans? Is this driven by preference for in-party ties or distaste for out-party ties? In a Twitter (now called X) field experiment, we created bot accounts varying by partisanship and whether they identified as bots or humans. We randomly assigned Twitter users (N = 3,013) to be followed by one of these accounts. We found evidence for social motivation-users were much more likely to reciprocate links to copartisan relative to counter-partisan accounts when the accounts identified as humans versus bots. We also found evidence for both in-party preference and out-party dispreference-users were as likely to follow back copartisan accounts as they were unlikely to followback counter-partisan accounts, compared to politically neutral accounts. A follow-up survey experiment (N = 990) provides further evidence for distinct roles of issue polarization, out-party animosity, and in-party affinity in moderating follow-back decisions online.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 390
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Parochial altruism in inter-group conflicts
    Abbink, Klaus
    Brandts, Jordi
    Herrmann, Benedikt
    Orzen, Henrik
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 117 (01) : 45 - 48
  • [2] Adamic L.A., 2005, P 3 INT WORKSH LINK, P36
  • [3] Friendship Prediction and Homophily in Social Media
    Aiello, Luca Maria
    Barrat, Alain
    Schifanella, Rossano
    Cattuto, Ciro
    Markines, Benjamin
    Menczer, Filippo
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON THE WEB, 2012, 6 (02)
  • [4] Ajzenman N., 2023, DISCRIMINATION FORMA
  • [5] Ajzenman N., 2023, PREPRINT
  • [6] American National Election Studies, 2021, ANES 2020 Time Series Study Full Release dataset and documentation
  • [7] In-Group Love Versus Out-Group Hate: Which Is More Important to Partisans and When?
    Amira, Karyn
    Wright, Jennifer Cole
    Goya-Tocchetto, Daniela
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 43 (02) : 473 - 494
  • [8] An J., 2016, P 10 AAAI C WEB SOC, V10, P523, DOI 10.1609/icwsm.v10i1.14767
  • [9] Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
    Bakshy, Eytan
    Messing, Solomon
    Adamic, Lada A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6239) : 1130 - 1132
  • [10] Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?
    Barbera, Pablo
    Jost, John T.
    Nagler, Jonathan
    Tucker, Joshua A.
    Bonneau, Richard
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (10) : 1531 - 1542