Public information officers' use of social media monitoring: An updated analysis of current practice

被引:0
作者
White, Carla [1 ]
Luttman, Shelby [1 ]
Avery, Elizabeth Johnson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Tombras Sch Advertising & Publ Relat, 476 Commun Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Social media; Social media management; Social media listening; Public health; Crisis; Health misinformation; Health disinformation; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS; COVID-19; MISINFORMATION; DIALOGIC THEORY; CRISIS; TRANSPARENCY; DIMENSIONS; MANAGEMENT; NETWORKING; INTENTION; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102539
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Identifying best practices for efficient yet effective social media listening and use among PIOs with limited resources is pressing given the pervasiveness of health dis- and misinformation. This study examines the practice of social media monitoring by public information officers (PIOs) at public health departments across the United States. The current study updates previous work (Avery, 2017) and explores the relationships between PIOs' time spent on social media management and monitoring as well as the effects of available time, financial, and personnel resources on use. The perceived impact of social media on the spread of health misinformation is discussed as well as the gaps between perceived benefits of social media monitoring and its practice. Recommendations include increasing the prioritization of social monitoring within public health departments to combat health misinformation online.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Social Media News Use and COVID-19 Misinformation Engagement: Survey Study
    Ahmed, Saifuddin
    Rasul, Muhammad Ehab
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (09)
  • [2] [Anonymous], "Resilience." American Psychological Association. APA.org. 2024. https://www.apa.org/topics/resilience.
  • [3] [Anonymous], 7 Whether it is possible to use phylogenetic data to determine the transmission of HIV virus from one person to another is a matter of active contestation in the HIV community. CDC and an international cohort of experts on this topic insist that it not possible using currently available methods. However, some scholars and activists claim that the science behind this statement is immaterial in the hands of over-zealous actors. I explore aspects of this controversy in the pages that
  • [4] Alexander McClelland, Adrian Guta, and Marilou Gagnon, "The Rise of Molecular HIV Surveillance: Implications on Consent and Criminalization," Critical Public Health, February 20, 2019, 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2019.1582755
  • [5] Martha Kempner, "New Study Triggers Concerns Over Use of Molecular HIV Surveillance," The Body Pro: The Complete HIV/AIDS Resource, March 4, 2019, http://www.thebodypro.com/content/ 81639/concerns-over-use-of-molecular-hiv-surveillance.html
  • [6] HIV Prevention Policy Project, "Molecular HIV Surveillance: Engaging HIV Community Stakeholders to Examine the Promise and Risks from the New Technology (Conference Program)," June 14, 2018., DOI DOI 10.3926/JOTSE.491
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2004, CANC FACTS FIGURES 2
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2023, Social Media and News Fact Sheet
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2024, Social media fact sheet
  • [10] Edelman, 2018, 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer