Ga68-PSMA PET for lymph node staging in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: In intermediate/high risk prostate cancer, preoperative staging exams are mandatory. The aim of these imaging studies is to evaluate eventual lymph nodes involvement and/or metastatic spread of the tumor. Nevertheless, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bone scan modalities have controversial sensitivity. Introduction of PET-PSMA and its use also as preoperative exam, seems to improve diagnostic accuracy due to favorable negative predictive value. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of PET-PSMA as a preoperative staging exam and its accuracy in predicting lymph nodes involvement in intermediate/high risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 50 patients diagnosed with intermediate/high risk PCa between 2018 and 2022 has been performed. All patients underwent preoperative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) + extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). The cohort was categorized into two groups: pathologically negative lymph nodes (pN0) vs. positive nodes (pN1). A descriptive and comparative analysis was conducted. Correlation analysis between continuous variables was performed using the Spearman's Rank Test. Using lymph nodes histopathological results as reference standard, the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 50 patients were included. The mean age was 63.3 years with a median prostatic specific antigen (PSA) of 7.7 ng/dL. Forty-four percent of the patients exhibited an International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score of 4 or higher, and 28% had a pT3 stage. Overall, 43 (86%) patients submitted to ePLND did not present lymph node metastases (pN0), while 8 (14%) patients were pN1. PET-PSMA showed low sensitivity in detecting lymph node metastases (25%) while a high specificity in excluding lymph-node disease (88.1%) has been observed. Finally, we noted a significant positive correlation between the total SUVmax of the prostate and the initial total PSA (r=0.38; P=0.019), as well as the percentage of tumor involvement (r=0.383; P=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the role of PET-PSMA in the primary staging of PCa is steadily building up. A positive correlation between SUV and prostate involvement indicates that PET-PSMA could reflect, with a good approximation, the pathological features of the prostate. However, the low sensitivity depicted remains the main limitation. Future prospective studies are needed to determine the impact on patient outcome.