Carbon Emission Evaluation System for Foundation Construction Based on Entropy-TOPSIS and K-Means Methods

被引:0
作者
Chen, Yuan [1 ]
He, Genglong [1 ]
Fang, Yuan [1 ]
Li, Dongxu [2 ]
Wang, Xi [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Civil & Transportat Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Airport Construct & Investment Grp Co Lt, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
关键词
low-carbon construction; carbon emission evaluation; entropy-TOPSIS; K-means; foundation construction; BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; CHINA;
D O I
10.3390/su17010369
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green construction evaluation systems can assist building stakeholders in scientifically evaluating the carbon emission performance of construction projects. However, most green construction evaluation tools and methods fail to explicitly incorporate construction carbon emission indicators, let alone a quantitative evaluation. Therefore, this study proposes a carbon emission evaluation system based on the entropy-TOPSIS and K-means methods for foundation construction projects. In this study, we innovatively divided the carbon emission of the foundation construction process into three phases, namely, transportation emission, excavation and earthwork emission, and pile work emission, considering their different emission characteristics and reduction difficulties by nature. Different from traditional carbon evaluation methods, the carbon emission of the three phases were evaluated separately against the baseline value obtained from local construction quota. After that, the emission performance of the three phases was weighted and evaluated based on the entropy-TOPSIS method, and then rated via the K-means method. Based on a case study of 19 residential buildings, the weights of the three construction phases were 27.66% (transportation), 42.34% (excavation and earthwork), and 29.99% (pile work). The carbon performance of the 19 cases were rated by the K-means method into four levels: six cases were rated "Excellent", five were rated "Good", five were rated "Fair", and three were rated "Poor". The proposed method was expected to objectively and scientifically evaluate and rate the carbon emission of the foundation construction process, and provided a theoretical basis for decision makers to identify emission hotspots and formulate specific carbon reduction measures.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [61] Charting a sustainable tomorrow: Advancing urban low-carbon economies through comprehensive evaluation and promotion
    Zhang, Peng
    Gao, Hongxin
    Zhang, Danyang
    Zhou, Enyi
    Khan, Farina
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [62] Assessment of embodied carbon emissions for building construction in China: Comparative case studies using alternative methods
    Zhang, Xiaocun
    Wang, Fenglai
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 130 : 330 - 340
  • [63] Comparison of evaluation standards for green building in China, Britain, United States
    Zhang, Yurong
    Wang, Jingjing
    Hu, Fangfang
    Wang, Yuanfeng
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 68 : 262 - 271
  • [64] The development model of sustainable campus based on green buildings: a systematic comparative study between Japan and China
    Zhu, Bifeng
    Liu, Gebing
    [J]. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 32 (02) : 805 - 823
  • [65] Applying an entropy-weighted TOPSIS method to evaluate energy green consumption revolution progressing of China
    Zou, Tong
    Guo, Pibin
    Wu, Qinglong
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (14) : 42267 - 42281