Unlocking the potential: Evaluating the impact of online gamified and non-gamified assessment tools on academic performance, motivation, engagement and satisfaction in undergraduate medical education

被引:0
作者
ul Ain, Noor [1 ]
Khan, Rehan Ahmed [1 ]
Iqbal, Sana [2 ]
机构
[1] Riphah Int Univ, Islamic Int Med Coll, Dept Med Educ, Al Mizan Campus,274,Peshawar Rd, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Riphah Int Univ, Islamic Int Dent Coll, Dept Dent Educ, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Medical education; gamification; formative assessment; academic performance;
D O I
10.1080/14703297.2024.2439472
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
With the advent of technology-enhanced learning, gamification has emerged as a promising strategy to augment student engagement and motivation for formative assessments. This study investigates the effects of online gamified versus non-gamified formative assessment tools on undergraduate medical students' academic performance, motivation, engagement and satisfaction. Utilising a comparative experimental design, this research involved 222 undergraduate medical students who were randomly assigned to two groups for the end-module assessments. Academic performance was measured through end-module assessment scores, and a questionnaire assessed the motivation, engagement and satisfaction levels of the students with these platforms. Students exposed to gamified assessments showed a significant improvement in academic performance and motivation compared to their non-gamified counterparts. The findings of this study highlight the beneficial impact of gamified formative assessments in medical education, particularly in terms of improving academic performance and student motivation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87 [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. ;
La Rochelle, Jeffrey S. ;
Dezee, Kent J. ;
Gehlbach, Hunter .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 (06) :463-474
[2]   FLOW - THE PSYCHOLOGY OF OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE - CSIKSZENTMIHALYI,M [J].
BECK, LA .
JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 1992, 24 (01) :93-94
[3]   Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda [J].
Behl, Abhishek ;
Jayawardena, Nirma ;
Pereira, Vijay ;
Islam, Nazrul ;
Del Giudice, Manlio ;
Choudrie, Jyoti .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 176
[4]  
Bengtsson M., 2016, PLAN PERFORM QUALITA, V2, P8, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NPLS.2016.01.001
[5]  
Brhlmann F., 2018, Gamification from the perspective of self-determination theory and flow, DOI [https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/6kauv, DOI 10.31237/OSF.IO/6KAUV]
[6]  
Byrne D, 2022, QUAL QUANT, V56, P1391, DOI [10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y, 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y, 10.1007/S11135-021-01182-Y/FIGURES/D, DOI 10.1007/S11135-021-01182-Y, 10.1177/1609406917733847, DOI 10.1177/1609406917733847]
[7]  
Creswell J.W., 2019, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
[9]  
Deterding S., 2011, CHI '11: Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, P2425, DOI DOI 10.1145/1979742.1979575
[10]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191