Assessing health technology implementation during academic research and early-stage development: support tools for awareness and guidance: a review

被引:0
作者
Roosink, Meyke [1 ]
van Gemert-Pijnen, Lisette [1 ]
Verdaasdonk, Ruud [2 ]
Kelders, Saskia M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Management & Social Sci, Ctr EHlth & Wellbeing Res, TechMed Ctr,Dept Psychol Hlth & Technol, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Fac Sci & Technol, TechMed Ctr, Dept Hlth Technol Implementat, Enschede, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
health technology; innovation; implementation; support tool; medical device; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3389/fdgth.2024.1386998
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
For successful health technology innovation and implementation it is key to, in an early phase, understand the problem and whether a proposed innovation is the best way to solve the problem. This review performed an initial exploration of published tools that support innovators in academic research and early stage development with awareness and guidance along the end-to-end process of development, evaluation and implementation of health technology innovations. Tools were identified from scientific literature as well as in grey literature by non-systematic searches in public research databases and search engines, and based on expert referral. A total number of 14 tools were included. Tools were classified as either readiness level tool (n = 6), questionnaire/checklist tool (n = 5) or guidance tool (n = 3). A qualitative analysis of the tools identified 5 key domains, 5 innovation phases and 3 implementation principles. All tools were mapped for (partially) addressing the identified domains, phases, and principles. The present review provides awareness of available tools and of important aspects of health technology innovation and implementation (vs. non-technological or non-health related technological innovations). Considerations for tool selection include for example the purpose of use (awareness or guidance) and the type of health technology innovation. Considerations for novel tool development include the specific challenges in academic and early stage development settings, the translation of implementation to early innovation phases, and the importance of multi-disciplinary strategic decision-making. A remaining attention point for future studies is the validation and effectiveness of (self-assessment) tools, especially in the context of support preferences and available support alternatives.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, The MAPS Toolkit: mHealth Assessment and Planning for Scale
  • [2] Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 9 (01) : 3 - 26
  • [3] Bruno Ilenia, 2020, ICEGOV 2020: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, P369, DOI 10.1145/3428502.3428552
  • [4] CB Insights, 2021, The Top 20 Reasons Startups Fail: From Lack of Product-Market Fit to Disharmony on the Team, We Break Down the Top 20 Reasons for Startup Failure by Analyzing 101 Startup Failure Post-Mortems
  • [5] Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation Technology (CIMIT), 2019, Navigating the Healthtech Innovation Cycle
  • [6] The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Reardon, Caitlin M.
    Widerquist, Marilla A. Opra
    Lowery, Julie
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [8] Crossing the valley of death: Five underlying innovation processes
    Ellwood, Paul
    Williams, Ceri
    Egan, John
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2022, 109
  • [9] European Parliament and Council, 2021, Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on Medical Devices
  • [10] RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    Harden, Samantha M.
    Gaglio, Bridget
    Rabin, Borsika
    Smith, Matthew Lee
    Porter, Gwenndolyn C.
    Ory, Marcia G.
    Estabrooks, Paul A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 7