Physician Preferences for an Electronic Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid

被引:1
作者
Morgan, Orly [1 ,2 ]
Schnur, Julie B. [3 ]
Diefenbach, Michael A. [5 ]
Kale, Minal S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Leonard M Miller Sch Med, Dept Med Educ, Miami, FL USA
[2] Univ Miami, Leonard M Miller Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Miami, FL USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Ctr Behav Oncol, Dept Populat Hlth Sci & Policy, New York, NY USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Gen Internal Med, 1 Gustave Levy Pl,Box 1087, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Northwell Hlth, Feinstein Inst Med Res, Manhasset, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HEALTH RECORD; PRIMARY-CARE; QUALITY; RISK; ATTITUDES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.37765/ajmc.2024.89551
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To present primary care physician (PCP) suggestions for design and implementation of a decision aid (DA) tool to support patient-provider shared decision- making on lung cancer screening (LCS). STUDY DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 PCPs at an academic medical center. METHODS: The deidentified transcripts were independently coded by 2 study interviewers and jointly reviewed every 5 interviews until we determined that data saturation had been achieved. We then identified themes in the data and selected illustrative quotes. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified: (1) make it brief and familiar (make the tool user-friendly and implement a similar format to other widely used DAs); (2) bring me to automation station (limit busywork; focus on the patient and on the decision); and (3) involve the patient (facilitate patient involvement in the DA with simple language, visual aids, and bullet-point takeaways). CONCLUSIONS: Findings contain concrete suggestions by PCPs to inform usable and acceptable LCS DA tool design and implementation. For an LCS DA to be most successful, PCPs emphasized that the tool must be easy to use and incorporate autopopulation functions to limit redundant patient charting.
引用
收藏
页码:SP445 / SP451
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
    Aberle, Denise R.
    Adams, Amanda M.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Black, William C.
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Fagerstrom, Richard M.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Marcus, Pamela M.
    Sicks, JoRean D.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) : 395 - 409
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Final recommendation statement: lung cancer: screening
  • [3] Benefits and Harms of CT Screening for Lung Cancer A Systematic Review
    Bach, Peter B.
    Mirkin, Joshua N.
    Oliver, Thomas K.
    Azzoli, Christopher G.
    Berry, Donald A.
    Brawley, Otis W.
    Byers, Tim
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Gould, Michael K.
    Jett, James R.
    Sabichi, Anita L.
    Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
    Wood, Douglas E.
    Qaseem, Amir
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (22): : 2418 - 2429
  • [4] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [5] Automated before-procedure electronic health record screening to assess appropriateness for GI endoscopy and sedation
    Campbell, Emily J.
    Krishnaraj, Arun
    Harris, Mitchell
    Saini, Sanjay
    Richter, James M.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 76 (04) : 786 - 792
  • [6] cancer, Key statistics for lung cancer
  • [7] A qualitative study exploring why individuals opt out of lung cancer screening
    Carter-Harris, Lisa
    Brandzel, Susan
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Roth, Joshua A.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (02) : 239 - 244
  • [8] Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature
    Cavers, Debbie
    Nelson, Mia
    Rostron, Jasmin
    Robb, Kathryn A.
    Brown, Lynsey R.
    Campbell, Christine
    Akram, Ahsan R.
    Dickie, Graeme
    Mackean, Melanie
    van Beek, Edwin J. R.
    Sullivan, Frank
    Steele, Robert J.
    Neilson, Aileen R.
    Weller, David
    [J]. RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [9] Perceptions of shared decision making among health care professionals
    Chung, Min-Chun
    Juang, Wang-Chuan
    Li, Ying-Chun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06) : 1080 - 1087
  • [10] A web-based decision aid for shared decision making in pelvic organ prolapse: the SHADE-POP trial
    Drost, Larissa Esmeralda
    Stegeman, Marjan
    Gerritse, Maria B. E.
    Franx, Arie
    Vos, M. Caroline
    Lamers, Romy E. D.
    Ezendam, Nicole P. M.
    Dam, Anika
    Schrickx, Jan
    van Wijk, Heidy F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 (01) : 79 - 86