Provision of medication and procedural abortion among Massachusetts obstetrician-gynecologists

被引:0
作者
Neill, Sara [1 ,3 ]
Joshi, Avina [1 ]
Hoe, Emily [2 ,4 ]
Fortin, Jennifer [5 ]
Goldberg, Alisa B. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Janiak, Elizabeth [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[5] ASPIRE Ctr Sexual & Reprod Hlth, Planned Parenthood League Massachusetts, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Abortion; Abortion training; Gynecology; Health care delivery; Implementation; Medication abortion;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110770
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of the study was to understand the rates of first-trimester medication and procedural abortion provision, sufficiency in abortion training, and factors associated with abortion provision among obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs) in Massachusetts. Study design: Electronically fielded surveys of a census of OB/GYNs in Massachusetts in 2021 queried physicians on abortion provision, training, practice type, and demographics. Using weighting to account for nonresponse, we generated estimates of the proportion of OB/GYNS providing abortion and used multivariate regression analysis to explore factors associated with abortion provision including practice type, physician sex, and sufficient abortion training. Results: A total of 198 OB/GYNs responded to the survey (response rate = 29%). Of 158 OB/GYNs not in training, 55% provide some abortion care. More respondents reported sufficient training for surgical abortion (84%) than for medication abortion (43%). The most cited reasons for not providing abortion care were lack of integration into their clinical practice (29%), institutional opposition (27%), or personal opposition to abortion (23%). In multivariate analysis, female physicians were more likely to provide abortion care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.72, 95% CI [1.63-4.55], p < 0.01), and those with insufficient training less likely to provide abortion (aOR 0.18, 95% CI [0.10-0.33], p = 0.01). Those in private practice (aOR 0.47, 95% CI [0.28-0.80], p < 0.01) or "other" practice types (aOR 0.16, 95% CI [0.09-0.27], p < 0.01) were less likely to provide abortion compared to physicians in academic practices. Conclusions: Only half of OB/GYNs in a state supportive of abortion provide abortion. Despite high patient interest in medication abortion, a majority of OB/GYNs report insufficient training in medication abortion. Implications: This study highlights the need for support from practice, institution, and health system leaders to facilitate the provision of abortion care and the need for increased training among OB/GYNs in medication abortion. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, US States Have Enacted 1
[2]   Remind Me Again: Physician Response to Web Surveys: The Effect of Email Reminders Across 11 Opinion Survey Efforts at the American Board of Internal Medicine from 2017 to 2019 [J].
Barnhart, Brendan J. ;
Reddy, Siddharta G. ;
Arnold, Gerald K. .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2021, 44 (03) :245-259
[3]   Defying the odds: Facilitating integration of abortion care into clinical practice in the United States☆,☆☆ [J].
Bayat, Lily ;
Biefeld, Sharla ;
Sussman, Andrew L. ;
Hofler, Lisa ;
Pereda, Brenda ;
Espey, Eve .
CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 138
[4]   Estimating abortion provision and abortion referrals among United States obstetrician-gynecologists in private practice [J].
Desai, Sheila ;
Jones, Rachel K. ;
Castle, Kate .
CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (04) :297-302
[5]  
Flanigan T.S., 2008, CONDUCTING SURVEY RE
[6]   Unsafe abortion: the silent scourge [J].
Grimes, DA .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 67 :99-113
[7]   Induced Abortion Provision Among a National Sample of Obstetrician-Gynecologists [J].
Grossman, Daniel ;
Grindlay, Kate ;
Altshuler, Anna L. ;
Schulkin, Jay .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 (03) :477-483
[8]   Physicians, abortion provision and the legitimacy paradox [J].
Harris, Lisa H. ;
Martin, Lisa ;
Debbink, Michelle ;
Hassinger, Jane .
CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 87 (01) :11-16
[9]   Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support [J].
Harris, Paul A. ;
Taylor, Robert ;
Thielke, Robert ;
Payne, Jonathon ;
Gonzalez, Nathaniel ;
Conde, Jose G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 42 (02) :377-381
[10]   Willing and Unable: Doctors' Constraints in Abortion Care [J].
Mayer, Jeremy D. .
WORLD MEDICAL & HEALTH POLICY, 2010, 2 (03) :143-146