Comparison between 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI-guided ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy for tumor detection and grading in selected patients: A prospective randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Niu, Shaoxi [1 ]
Liu, Yachao [2 ]
Ao, Liyan [1 ,3 ]
Ding, Xiaohui [4 ]
Chang, Xiao [1 ]
Li, Jinhang [4 ]
Liu, Jiajin [2 ]
Liu, Kan [1 ]
Zou, Nanxing [1 ,3 ]
Xu, Baixuan [2 ]
Xu, Yong [1 ]
Wang, Baojun [1 ]
Zhang, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 3, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Dept Nucl Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese PLA Med Sch, Grad Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Dept Pathol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostatic neoplasm; 18F-DCFPyL; PET; Targeted biopsy; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; PROSTATE-CANCER; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFICATION; PROPOSAL; ANTIGEN; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajur.2024.07.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to compare the upgrade rate and cancer detection rate between the 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI-guided ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (TB) and systematic biopsy in selected patients with suspected prostate cancer (the molecular imaging prostate-specific membrane antigen score of >= 2 and multiparametric MRI Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score of >= 4). Methods: Eighty-seven selected biopsy-naive patients were randomized into two groups: TB (n=41) and systematic biopsy (control; n=46). Patients diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer proceeded to radical prostatectomy. The primary outcome was the pathological upgrade rate. Secondary outcomes, including the cancer detection rate, incidence of repeat biopsy, positive surgical margin, complications, and prostate-specific antigen level at 6 weeks postoperatively, were compared between the groups using the Pearson or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.Results: In the study, prostate cancer was ultimately detected in all patients. The TB group successfully identified all tumors, whereas five patients in the control group initially missed diagnosis. The pathological upgrade rates for the TB and control groups were 31.7 % and 56.5%, respectively. Overall, the detection rate for clinically significant prostate cancer (the International Society of Urological Pathology grade of >= 2) was significantly higher in the TB group (92.7%) compared with the control group (76.1%, p=0.035). However, no significant difference was found in the detection rate of all prostate cancer. Complications (Clavien-Dindo grade of <2) occurred in both the TB group (n=11) and control group (n=13). No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the positive surgical margin, complications, or 6-week postoperative prostate-specific antigen level. Conclusion: The 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI-guided ultrasound fusion TB alone was an efficient modality in diagnosing selected patients with prostate cancer. <feminine ordinal indicator> 2025 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] A Pilot Study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT or PET/MRI and Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy for Intra-Prostatic PET-Positive Lesions
    Liu, Yachao
    Yu, Hongkai
    Liu, Jiajin
    Zhang, Xiaojun
    Lin, Mu
    Schmidt, Holger
    Gao, Jiangping
    Xu, Baixuan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [2] Direct Comparison of Targeted MRI-Guided Biopsy with Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in Patients with Previous Negative Prostate Biopsies
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Kruck, Stephan
    Kramer, Ulrich
    Gatidis, Sergios
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Roethke, Matthias
    Scharpf, Marcus
    Schilling, David
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 94 (03) : 319 - 325
  • [3] Prospective Comparison of PET Imaging with PSMA-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL Versus Na18F for Bone Lesion Detection in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Li, Xin
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Werner, Rudolf A.
    Frey, Sarah
    DiGianvittorio, Michael
    Bleiler, J. Keith
    Reyes, Diane K.
    Abdallah, Rehab
    Pienta, Kenneth J.
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (02) : 183 - 188
  • [4] A Prospective Comparison of MRI-Guided Targeted Biopsy with 12-Core Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An Indian Experience
    Netaji, Arjunlokesh
    Kubihal, Vijay
    Sharma, Raju
    Seth, Amlesh
    Kaushal, Seema
    Das, Chandan J.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2024,
  • [5] Detection of prostate cancer with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT compared to final histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens: is PSMA-targeted biopsy feasible? The DeTeCT trial
    Y. J. L. Bodar
    B. H. E. Jansen
    J. P. van der Voorn
    G. J. C. Zwezerijnen
    D. Meijer
    J. A. Nieuwenhuijzen
    R. Boellaard
    N. H. Hendrikse
    O. S. Hoekstra
    R. J. A. van Moorselaar
    D. E. Oprea-Lager
    A. N. Vis
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 2439 - 2446
  • [6] Comparison of MRI artificial intelligence-guided cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy versus routine cognitive fusion-targeted prostate biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: a randomized controlled trial
    Deng, Ruiyi
    Liu, Yi
    Wang, Kexin
    Ruan, Mingjian
    Li, Derun
    Wu, Jingyun
    Qiu, Jianhui
    Wu, Pengsheng
    Tian, Peidong
    Yu, Chaojian
    Shang, Jiaheng
    Zhao, Zihou
    Zhou, Jingcheng
    Cai, Lin
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Gong, Kan
    BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01):
  • [7] Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-guided In-bore Biopsy to MRI-ultrasound Fusion and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies
    Arsov, Christian
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Blondin, Dirk
    Quentin, Michael
    Hiester, Andreas
    Godehardt, Erhard
    Gabbert, Helmut E.
    Becker, Nikolaus
    Antoch, Gerald
    Albers, Peter
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) : 713 - 720
  • [8] Ultrasound/MRI-targeted biopsy versus saturated trans-rectal ultrasound guided biopsy of prostate in patients with primary negative conventional biopsy and still elevated PSA: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Dadpour, Mehdi
    Soltani, Amir Mohammad
    Ghafoori, Mahyar
    Basiri, Abbas
    Borumandnia, Nasrin
    Nayebzade, Amirhossein
    Narouie, Behzad
    Hasani, Hamed
    Shakhssalim, Nasser
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL UROLOGY, 2023, 11 (04): : 312 - 319
  • [9] Comparison of Regional Saturation Biopsy, Targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Levels of 4-20 ng/ml: A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jiang, Xingkang
    Chen, Mingzhe
    Tian, Jing
    Li, Xiaohua
    Liu, Ranlu
    Wang, Yong
    Zhao, Yang
    Peng, Shuanghe
    Niu, Yuanjie
    Xu, Yong
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (04): : 944 - 953
  • [10] Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhu, Aiyun
    Sun, Dingqi
    Guo, Shanjie
    Zhang, Hui
    Liu, Shuai
    Fu, Qiang
    Zhang, Keqin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (07) : 1698 - 1702