Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women

被引:0
作者
Gold, Ronen S. [1 ]
Neuman, Jonatan [2 ]
Baruch, Yoav [1 ]
Neuman, Menahem [3 ]
Groutz, Asnat [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Lis Matern & Womens Hosp, Tel Aviv Med Ctr, Med Sch,Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Urogynecol Unit, IL-6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Semmelweis Univ, Med Sch, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Assuta Med Ctr, Med Sch, Urogynecol Serv, IL-8410501 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
sacrospinous ligament fixation; pelvic organ prolapse; surgery; EnPlace (R); older women; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13185520
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive sacrospinous ligament (SSL) fixation of apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in older patients compared to younger patients. Methods: A cohort of 271 older (>= 65 years) patients (mean age 71.8 +/- 5.2 years) and 60 younger patients (mean age 47.6 +/- 7.1 years) with stage III or IV apical POP who underwent SSL fixation by the EnPlace (R) device was retrospectively analyzed. The age range of older patients was further divided into early old (65-74 y, N = 209), old (75-84 y, N = 58), and late old (>85 y, N = 4). Patient characteristics, surgical safety, and 6-month postoperative outcomes were compared between the four age groups. Results: Duration of surgery and blood loss were similar among all age groups. Most patients (99.4%) were discharged on the day of surgery or the day after. Subjective patient satisfaction rates were high among all patients. Point C measurements at six months postoperatively were less favorable among the younger patients. Furthermore, four (6.7%) younger patients versus six (2.2%) older patients required surgical repair of recurrent apical POP within the follow-up period. Conclusions: The short-term outcomes of minimally invasive SSL fixation suggest that it is a safe and effective procedure for significant apical POP repair among older patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Serious Complications and Recurrence following Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Correction of Apical Prolapse
    De Gracia, Susie
    Fatton, Brigitte
    Cosson, Michel
    Campagne-Loiseau, Sandrine
    Ferry, Philippe
    Lucot, Jean-Philippe
    Debodinance, Philippe
    Panel, Laure
    Deffieux, Xavier
    Garbin, Olivier
    Lamblin, Gery
    Carlier-Guerin, Caroline
    Ramanah, Rajeev
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    Serrand, Chris
    Fritel, Xavier
    de Tayrac, Renaud
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [22] Laparoscopic Pectopexy versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Apical Prolapse
    Brasoveanu, Simona
    Ilina, Razvan
    Balulescu, Ligia
    Pirtea, Marilena
    Secosan, Cristina
    Grigoras, Dorin
    Chiriac, Daniela
    Bardan, Razvan
    Margan, Madalin-Marius
    Alexandru, Alexandru
    Pirtea, Laurentiu
    LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [23] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: perioperative outcomes
    Gabra, Martina G.
    Winget, Veronica
    Torabi, Mohammad T.
    Addis, Ilana
    Hatch, Kenneth
    Heusinkveld, John
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [24] A comparison of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation for treating pelvic organ prolapse
    Zhu, Hongxia
    Sun, Yixuan
    Zheng, Xuan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (05): : 5672 - 5678
  • [25] Efficacy of Laparoscopic Sacrocervicopexy for Apical Support of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Rosati, Maurizio
    Bramante, Silvia
    Bracale, Umberto
    Pignata, Giusto
    Azioni, Guglielmo
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2013, 17 (02) : 235 - 244
  • [26] Long-Term Outcome of Anterior-Apical Mesh (Surelift) Versus Anterior Colporrhaphy and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Rellora, Louiza Erika
    Rom, Eyal
    Chiung, Huan-Ka
    Yang, Chia-Hsuan
    Lin, Yi-Hao
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, : 857 - 866
  • [27] Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Yuanzhuo
    Peng, Liao
    Zhang, Jie
    Shen, Hong
    Luo, Deyi
    UROLOGY, 2022, 166 : 133 - 139
  • [28] Comparing the Long-Term Outcome of Uterosacral and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension Surgeries in Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Sukgen, Gokmen
    Kaya, Aski Ellibes
    KONURALP TIP DERGISI, 2018, 10 (03): : 381 - 386
  • [29] Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic pubocervical fascia reconstruction and sacrospinous ligament fixation with posterior approach for a pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective study of 124 cases
    Zhu, Yunshan
    Zhang, Xiao
    Chen, Danxia
    Li, Guangxiao
    Shang, Shanliang
    Li, Jianqiong
    Yang, Jianhua
    LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 6 (04): : 154 - 159
  • [30] A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy
    Yadav, Ghanshyam S.
    Gaddam, Neha
    Rahn, David D.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (03): : 133 - 139