Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Older Women

被引:0
作者
Gold, Ronen S. [1 ]
Neuman, Jonatan [2 ]
Baruch, Yoav [1 ]
Neuman, Menahem [3 ]
Groutz, Asnat [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Lis Matern & Womens Hosp, Tel Aviv Med Ctr, Med Sch,Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Urogynecol Unit, IL-6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Semmelweis Univ, Med Sch, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Assuta Med Ctr, Med Sch, Urogynecol Serv, IL-8410501 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
sacrospinous ligament fixation; pelvic organ prolapse; surgery; EnPlace (R); older women; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13185520
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive sacrospinous ligament (SSL) fixation of apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in older patients compared to younger patients. Methods: A cohort of 271 older (>= 65 years) patients (mean age 71.8 +/- 5.2 years) and 60 younger patients (mean age 47.6 +/- 7.1 years) with stage III or IV apical POP who underwent SSL fixation by the EnPlace (R) device was retrospectively analyzed. The age range of older patients was further divided into early old (65-74 y, N = 209), old (75-84 y, N = 58), and late old (>85 y, N = 4). Patient characteristics, surgical safety, and 6-month postoperative outcomes were compared between the four age groups. Results: Duration of surgery and blood loss were similar among all age groups. Most patients (99.4%) were discharged on the day of surgery or the day after. Subjective patient satisfaction rates were high among all patients. Point C measurements at six months postoperatively were less favorable among the younger patients. Furthermore, four (6.7%) younger patients versus six (2.2%) older patients required surgical repair of recurrent apical POP within the follow-up period. Conclusions: The short-term outcomes of minimally invasive SSL fixation suggest that it is a safe and effective procedure for significant apical POP repair among older patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Serious Complications and Recurrence following Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Correction of Apical Prolapse [J].
De Gracia, Susie ;
Fatton, Brigitte ;
Cosson, Michel ;
Campagne-Loiseau, Sandrine ;
Ferry, Philippe ;
Lucot, Jean-Philippe ;
Debodinance, Philippe ;
Panel, Laure ;
Deffieux, Xavier ;
Garbin, Olivier ;
Lamblin, Gery ;
Carlier-Guerin, Caroline ;
Ramanah, Rajeev ;
Fauconnier, Arnaud ;
Serrand, Chris ;
Fritel, Xavier ;
de Tayrac, Renaud .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
[22]   Efficacy of Sacrospinous Fixation or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Martins, Sergio Brasileiro ;
Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino ;
Takano, Claudia Cristina ;
Marquini, Gisele Vissoci ;
de Oliveira, Leticia Maria ;
Martins Jr, Paulo Cezar Feldner ;
Dias, Marcia Maria ;
Girao, Manoel Joao Batista Castello ;
Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2023, 45 (10) :E584-E593
[23]   Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: perioperative outcomes [J].
Gabra, Martina G. ;
Winget, Veronica ;
Torabi, Mohammad T. ;
Addis, Ilana ;
Hatch, Kenneth ;
Heusinkveld, John .
GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 18 (01)
[24]   A comparison of modified laparoscopic uterine suspension and vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation for treating pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Zhu, Hongxia ;
Sun, Yixuan ;
Zheng, Xuan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (05) :5672-5678
[25]   Efficacy of Laparoscopic Sacrocervicopexy for Apical Support of Pelvic Organ Prolapse [J].
Rosati, Maurizio ;
Bramante, Silvia ;
Bracale, Umberto ;
Pignata, Giusto ;
Azioni, Guglielmo .
JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2013, 17 (02) :235-244
[26]   Long-Term Outcome of Anterior-Apical Mesh (Surelift) Versus Anterior Colporrhaphy and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery [J].
Lo, Tsia-Shu ;
Rellora, Louiza Erika ;
Rom, Eyal ;
Chiung, Huan-Ka ;
Yang, Chia-Hsuan ;
Lin, Yi-Hao .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, 36 (04) :857-866
[27]   Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Chen, Yuanzhuo ;
Peng, Liao ;
Zhang, Jie ;
Shen, Hong ;
Luo, Deyi .
UROLOGY, 2022, 166 :133-139
[28]   Comparing the Long-Term Outcome of Uterosacral and Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension Surgeries in Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse [J].
Sukgen, Gokmen ;
Kaya, Aski Ellibes .
KONURALP TIP DERGISI, 2018, 10 (03) :381-386
[29]   Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic pubocervical fascia reconstruction and sacrospinous ligament fixation with posterior approach for a pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective study of 124 cases [J].
Zhu, Yunshan ;
Zhang, Xiao ;
Chen, Danxia ;
Li, Guangxiao ;
Shang, Shanliang ;
Li, Jianqiong ;
Yang, Jianhua .
LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 6 (04) :154-159
[30]   A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy [J].
Yadav, Ghanshyam S. ;
Gaddam, Neha ;
Rahn, David D. .
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (03) :133-139