The effects of matching/mismatching cognitive styles in E-learning

被引:1
作者
Wu, Chih-Hung [1 ]
Tang, Kai-Di [1 ]
Peng, Kang-Lin [2 ]
Liu, Chih-Hsing [5 ]
Huang, Yueh-Min [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taichung Univ Educ, Dept Digital Content & Technol, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] City Univ Macau, Fac Int Tourism & Management, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Engn Sci, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Educ, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Kaohsiung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Tourism Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
Cognitive style; matching and mismatching cognition; holist/serialist; physiological analysis; DIFFERENT MULTIMEDIA MATERIALS; ASYNCHRONOUS ONLINE; MENTAL WORKLOAD; STUDENTS; EMOTION; RECOGNITION; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; LEARNERS; SENSORS;
D O I
10.1080/01443410.2024.2434741
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Cognitive styles and affective factors are critical factors affecting e-learning performance in this digital era. Learners can enhance their affective learning with a correct cognitive style. This study aims to examine various cognitive styles with effective learning measurement tools through subjective and objective instruments by observing physiological signals and mental load questionnaires as the matching and mismatching styles matter to learning outcomes. The research design adopted multiple measurements to examine the effects of cognitive styles on learning outcomes. The mental load measure included the system usability scale and the NASA task load index (NASA-TLX) scale. The objective measure adopted physiological signals, including emotion, brainwave attention, heart rhythm variability, blood oxygen concentration, breathing, skin temperature, and galvanic skin response. The results revealed that matching cognitive style learners had better learning performance with more positive emotion and less mental load, fatigue, and stress than mismatching cognitive style learners. We concluded that the matching cognition of learning materials could benefit learning outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1048 / 1072
页数:25
相关论文
共 89 条
[21]  
Febiyani A., 2021, Jurnal Sistem Dan Manajemen Industri, V5, P35, DOI [10.30656/jsmi.v5i1.2789, DOI 10.30656/JSMI.V5I1.2789]
[22]  
Ford N., 2000, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, V9, P281
[23]   Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning ana teaching styles [J].
Ford, N ;
Chen, SY .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 32 (01) :5-22
[25]   Happy people thrive on adversity: Pre-existing mood moderates the effect of emotion inductions on creative thinking [J].
Forgeard, Marie J. C. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 51 (08) :904-909
[26]   Teacher emotions in the classroom and their implications for students [J].
Frenzel, Anne C. ;
Daniels, Lia ;
Buric, Irena .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2021, 56 (04) :250-264
[27]   Why We (Usually) Don't Have to Worry About Multiple Comparisons [J].
Gelman, Andrew ;
Hill, Jennifer ;
Yajima, Masanao .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, 2012, 5 (02) :189-211
[28]  
Giancola M., 2022, Thinking Skills and Creativity, V45, P101047, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TSC.2022.101047
[29]   Comparison of finger plethysmograph to ECG in the measurement of heart rate variability [J].
Giardino, ND ;
Lehrer, PM ;
Edelberg, R .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (02) :246-253
[30]   Active versus Passive Strategy in Online Creativity Training: How to Best Promote Creativity of Students with Different Cognitive Styles? [J].
Gu, Xiaojing ;
Tan, Yafei ;
Wu, Xiaofei ;
Cai, Zhouqu ;
Lai, Qing ;
Cheng, Min ;
Zhao, Qingbai .
THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2022, 44