Stakeholders' perspectives on disinvestment of low-value healthcare interventions and practices in Malaysia: an online survey

被引:0
作者
Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana [1 ,2 ]
Grieve, Eleanor [1 ]
Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni Ku [2 ]
Izzuna, M. M. G. [2 ]
Wai, Lee Sit [2 ]
Romli, Erni Zurina [2 ]
Abdullah, Mohamed Hirman [3 ]
Wu, Olivia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Hlth Econ & Hlth Technol Assessment HEHTA, Glasgow, Scotland
[2] Minist Hlth Malaysia, Med Dev Div, Malaysian Hlth Technol Assessment Sect MaHTAS, Putrajaya, Malaysia
[3] Minist Hlth Malaysia, Hosp Serv Dev Sect, Med Dev Div, Putrajaya, Malaysia
关键词
disinvestment; stakeholder engagement; health technology reassessment; resource allocation; health care surveys; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462324004665
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives:Healthcare disinvestment requires multi-level decision-making, and early stake-holder engagement is essential to facilitate implementation and acceptance. This study aimed toexplore the perceptions of Malaysian healthcare stakeholders to disinvestment initiatives as wellas identify disinvestment activities in the country. Methods:A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from February to March 2023 amongMalaysian healthcare stakeholders involved in resource allocation and decision-making atvarious levels of governance. Response frequencies were analyzed descriptively and cross-tabulation was performed for specific questions to compare the responses of different groupsof stakeholders. For free-text replies, content analysis was used with each verbatim responseexamined and assigned a theme. Results:A total of 153 complete responses were analyzed and approximately 37 percent ofparticipants had prior involvement in disinvestment initiatives. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness ranked as the most important criteria in assessment for disinvestment. Surpris-ingly, equity was rated the lowest priority despite its crucial role in healthcare decision-making.Almost 90 percent of the respondents concurred that a formal disinvestment framework isnecessary and the importance of training for the program's successful implementation. Keyobstacles to the adoption of disinvestment include insufficient stakeholder support and politicalwill as well as a lack of expertise in executing the process. Conclusions:While disinvestment is perceived as a priority for efficient resource allocation inMalaysian healthcare, there is a lack of a systematic framework for its implementation. Futureresearch should prioritize methodological analysis in healthcare disinvestment and strategies forintegrating equity considerations in evaluating disinvestment candidates.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review
    Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni Ku
    Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana
    Dahlui, Maznah
    Puteh, Sharifa Ezat Wan
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2020, 21 : 91 - 99
  • [2] STATUS OF DISINVESTMENT INITIATIVES IN LATIN AMERICA: RESULTS FROM A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND A QUESTIONNAIRE
    Agirrezabal, Ion
    Burgon, Joseph
    Stewart, Gavin
    Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, Inaki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 33 (06) : 674 - 680
  • [3] De-implementing low-value care in cancer care delivery: a systematic review
    Alishahi Tabriz, Amir
    Turner, Kea
    Clary, Alecia
    Hong, Young-Rock
    Nguyen, Oliver T.
    Wei, Grace
    Carlson, Rebecca B.
    Birken, Sarah A.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [4] National governance of de-implementation of low-value care: a qualitative study in Sweden
    Augustsson, Hanna
    Morici, Belen Casales
    Hasson, Henna
    Schwarz, Ulrica von Thiele
    Schalling, Sara Korlen
    Ingvarsson, Sara
    Wijk, Hanna
    Roczniewska, Marta
    Nilsen, Per
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [5] Disinvestment in healthcare: an overview of HTA agencies and organizations activities at European level
    Calabro, G. E.
    La Torre, G.
    de Waure, C.
    Villari, P.
    Federici, A.
    Ricciardi, W.
    Specchia, M. L.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [6] A Review of Empirical Analyses of Disinvestment Initiatives
    Chambers, James D.
    Salem, Mark N.
    D'Cruz, Brittany N.
    Subedi, Prasun
    Kamal-Bahl, Sachin J.
    Neumann, Peter J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (07) : 909 - 918
  • [7] Public perspectives on disinvestments in drug funding: results from a Canadian deliberative public engagement event on cancer drugs
    Costa, Sarah
    Bentley, Colene
    Regier, Dean A.
    McTaggart-Cowan, Helen
    Mitton, Craig
    Burgess, Michael M.
    Peacock, Stuart J.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [8] Identification of knowledge translation theories, models or frameworks suitable for health technology reassessment: a survey of international experts
    Esmail, Rosmin
    Hanson, Heather M.
    Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
    Niven, Daniel J.
    Clement, Fiona M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [9] How Least Developed to Lower-Middle Income Countries Use Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review
    Falkowski, Anna
    Ciminata, Giorgio
    Manca, Francesco
    Bouttell, Janet
    Jaiswal, Nishant
    Farhana Binti Kamaruzaman, Hanin
    Hollingworth, Samantha
    Al-Adwan, Mariana
    Heggie, Robert
    Putri, Septiara
    Rana, Dikshyanta
    Mukelabai Simangolwa, Warren
    Grieve, Eleanor
    [J]. PATHOGENS AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 117 (02) : 104 - 119
  • [10] Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm
    Harrison, Christopher J.
    Konings, Karen D.
    Schuwirth, Lambert W. T.
    Wass, Valerie
    van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 17