Factors influencing the implementation and adherence to volume-based enteral feeding protocols in the critical care setting: A scoping review

被引:0
作者
Hall, Carolyn [1 ]
Page, Sophie [1 ]
Kelly, Noel [1 ]
Kardaris, Karthika [1 ]
Hanna, Lauren [2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Hlth, Dept Nutr & Dietet, Clayton, VIC, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Nutr Dietet & Food, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
关键词
Volume-based feeding; Catch-up feeding; Enteral nutrition; Enteral feeding; ICU; Adult; PROTEIN-ENERGY PROVISION; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; NUTRITION; MULTICENTER; DELIVERY; PREVALENCE; ICU; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.aucc.2025.101209
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Delivery of enteral nutrition is an essential component of care for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU); however, patients only receive approximately 60% of prescribed enteral nutrition. Volumebased feeding (VBF) has been demonstrated as a safe and effective strategy to catch up for missed delivery of enteral nutrition. The aim of this review was to investigate factors influencing the adherence and implementation of VBF in the adult critical care and high-dependency unit settings to inform future implementation of VBF protocols in the ICU. Methods: Systematic searches of databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Emcare) and grey literature repositories (TROVE, TRIP, CPG Infobase, WorldCat, and Google) were conducted to identify original research studies including adults admitted to the ICU, where VBF or catch-up feeding protocols were in place. Studies reporting on barriers, enablers, and acceptability or adherence to VBF protocols were included. Results: A total of 28 studies involving 7057 participants were eligible for inclusion, of which 19 were conducted in the USA, seven in Canada, one in the UK, and one in Australia. Factors enabling the implementation of VBF included management support, multidisciplinary team engagement, a project team, multimodal education, and communication strategies. Embedding the protocol into current work systems increased success. Barriers included a culture of deprioritising nutrition, safety concerns, staff turnover, and failure to embed the changes into work systems including the electronic medical record. VBF was considered acceptable to ICU staff; however, adherence to VBF protocols was variable (between 32.1% and 90%). Conclusion: Successful implementation of a VBF protocol is enabled by strong project leadership, staff education, team engagement, and embedding VBF into current work processes. VBF is acceptable to staff; however, continuous education is recommended to sustain change in practice. Implementation of VBF should be considered as part of an "enhanced" feeding strategy in the ICU setting. Registration: The protocol was developed and registered a priori on Open Science Framework on 8th August 2023 (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8DJKY). (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Hospital Malnutrition: Prevalence, Identification and Impact on Patients and the Healthcare System
    Barker, Lisa A.
    Gout, Belinda S.
    Crowe, Timothy C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 8 (02) : 514 - 527
  • [2] NutritionDay ICU: A 7 year worldwide prevalence study of nutrition practice in intensive care
    Bendavid, Itai
    Singer, Pierre
    Theilla, Miriam
    Themessl-Huber, Michael
    Sulz, Isabella
    Mouhieddine, Mohamed
    Schuh, Christian
    Mora, Bruno
    Hiesmayr, Michael
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2017, 36 (04) : 1122 - 1129
  • [3] Implementing Volume-Based Feeding Optimize Delivery of Enteral Nutrition
    Bonomo, Angela
    Blume, Diane Lynn
    Davis, Katie
    Kim, Hee Jun
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2021, 41 (02) : 16 - 26
  • [4] Safety and efficacy of volume-based feeding in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults using the "Protein & Energy Requirements Fed for Every Critically ill patient every Time' (PERFECT) protocol: a before-and-after study
    Brierley-Hobson, Sue
    Clarke, Graham
    O'Keeffe, Vincent
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 23 (1)
  • [5] Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement
    Cabana, MD
    Rand, CS
    Powe, NR
    Wu, AW
    Wilson, MH
    Abboud, PAC
    Rubin, HR
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15): : 1458 - 1465
  • [6] Nutrition therapy in the critical care setting: What is "best achievable" practice? An international multicenter observational study
    Cahill, Naomi E.
    Dhaliwal, Rupinder
    Day, Andrew G.
    Jiang, Xuran
    Heyland, Daren K.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (02) : 395 - 401
  • [7] Conniff S, 2019, Evaluating the effects of implementing a volume-based protocol in an ICU setting internet
  • [8] Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview
    Correa, Veronica Ciro
    Lugo-Agudelo, Luz Helena
    Aguirre-Acevedo, Daniel Camilo
    Contreras, Jesus Alberto Plata
    Borrero, Ana Maria Posada
    Patino-Lugo, Daniel F.
    Valencia, Dolly Andrea Castano
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [9] Growth of Head Circumference and Body Length in Preterm Infants Receiving a Multicomponent vs a Soybean-Based Lipid Emulsion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Costa, Simonetta
    Cocca, Carmen
    Barone, Giovanni
    Catenazzi, Piero
    Gallini, Francesca
    Maggio, Luca
    Fusco, Francesca Paola
    Vento, Giovanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2021, 45 (01) : 94 - 101
  • [10] Enhanced Protein-Energy Provision via the Enteral Route Feeding (PEPuP) protocol in critically ill surgical patients: a multicentre prospective evaluation
    Declercq, B.
    Deane, A. M.
    Wang, M.
    Chapman, M. J.
    Heyland, D. K.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2016, 44 (01) : 93 - 98