Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health

被引:0
作者
Francis, Cathy J. [1 ]
Hazelton, Michael [1 ]
Wilson, Rhonda L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Dept Nursing, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] NSW Hlth, Cent Coast Local Hlth Dist, Gosford, NSW, Australia
关键词
mental health; person-centred care; shared decision-making; supported decision-making; UNCRPD; PSYCHIATRIC ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; JOINT CRISIS PLANS; BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; SERVICE USER; SELF-MANAGEMENT; PERSPECTIVES; MEDICATION; SAFETY; INDIVIDUALS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/hex.70134
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMost people with mental ill health want to be involved in decision-making about their care, many mental health professionals now recognise the importance of this (at least in-principle) and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities enshrines the ethical imperative to support people in making their own treatment decisions. Nonetheless, there are widespread reports of people with mental ill health being excluded from decision-making about their treatment in practice.ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed method research on interventions to improve opportunities for the involvement of mental healthcare service users in treatment planning. We sought to consolidate and understand the evidence on the outcomes of shared and supported decision-making for people with mental ill health.MethodsSeven databases were searched and 5137 articles were screened. Articles were included if they reported on an intervention for adult service users, were published between 2008 and October 2023 and were in English. Evidence in the 140 included articles was synthesised according to the JBI guidance on Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews.ResultsThere was evidence relating to the effects of these interventions on a range of outcomes for people with mental ill health, including on: suicidal crisis, symptoms, recovery, hospital admissions, treatment engagement and on the use of coercion by health professionals. There is favourable evidence for these types of interventions in improving some outcomes for people with mental ill health, more so than treatment-as-usual. For other outcomes, the evidence is preliminary but promising. Some areas for caution are also identified.ConclusionsThe review indicates that when the involvement of people with mental ill health in treatment planning is supported, there can be improved outcomes for their health and care. Areas for future research are highlighted.Patient or Public ContributionThis systematic review has been guided at all stages by a researcher with experience of mental health service use, who does not wish to be identified at this point in time. The findings may inform organisations, researchers and practitioners on the benefits of implementing supported decision-making, for the greater involvement of people with mental ill health in their healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]   Evaluation of a patient activation and empowerment intervention in mental health care [J].
Alegria, Margarita ;
Polo, Antonio ;
Gao, Shan ;
Santana, Luz ;
Rothstein, Dan ;
Jimenez, Aida ;
Hunter, Mary Lyons ;
Mendieta, Frances ;
Oddo, Vanessa ;
Normand, Sharon-Lise .
MEDICAL CARE, 2008, 46 (03) :247-256
[2]   Impact of pharmacist intervention on adherence and measurable patient outcomes among depressed patients: a randomised controlled study [J].
Aljumah, K. ;
Hassali, M. A. .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 15
[3]   Increasing person-centeredness in psychosis inpatient care: staff experiences from the Person-Centered Psychosis Care (PCPC) project [J].
Allerby, K. ;
Goulding, A. ;
Ali, L. ;
Waern, M. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
[4]  
Ambrosini D. L., 2011, Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, V6, P1
[5]   Seven-day shared decision making for outpatients with first episode of mood disorders among university students: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Aoki, Yumi ;
Takaesu, Yoshikazu ;
Inoue, Masato ;
Furuno, Takehiko ;
Kobayashi, Yasushi ;
Chiba, Hiromi ;
Kakita, Yasuhide ;
Hori, Masashi ;
Tachimori, Hisateru ;
Watanabe, Koichiro .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2019, 281
[6]   Management or missed opportunity? Mental health care planning in Australian general practice [J].
Banfield, Michelle ;
Farrer, Louise M. ;
Harrison, Christopher .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2019, 25 (04) :332-338
[7]   Randomised Controlled Trial of Joint Crisis Plans to Reduce Compulsory Treatment for People with Psychosis: Economic Outcomes [J].
Barrett, Barbara ;
Waheed, Waquas ;
Farrelly, Simone ;
Birchwood, Max ;
Dunn, Graham ;
Flach, Clare ;
Henderson, Claire ;
Leese, Morven ;
Lester, Helen ;
Marshall, Max ;
Rose, Diana ;
Sutherby, Kim ;
Szmukler, George ;
Thornicroft, Graham ;
Byford, Sarah .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (11)
[8]   Professional perspectives on service user and carer involvement in mental health care planning: A qualitative study [J].
Bee, Penny ;
Brooks, Helen ;
Fraser, Claire ;
Lovell, Karina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2015, 52 (12) :1834-1845
[9]   Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning [J].
Bee, Penny ;
Price, Owen ;
Baker, John ;
Lovell, Karina .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 207 (02) :104-114
[10]   Trends and perspectives of shared decision-making in schizophrenia and related disorders [J].
Beitinger, Romain ;
Kissling, Werner ;
Hamann, Johannes .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 27 (03) :222-229