Supported Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Outcomes for People With Mental Ill Health

被引:0
作者
Francis, Cathy J. [1 ]
Hazelton, Michael [1 ]
Wilson, Rhonda L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth & Biomed Sci, Dept Nursing, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] NSW Hlth, Cent Coast Local Hlth Dist, Gosford, NSW, Australia
关键词
mental health; person-centred care; shared decision-making; supported decision-making; UNCRPD; PSYCHIATRIC ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; JOINT CRISIS PLANS; BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; SERVICE USER; SELF-MANAGEMENT; PERSPECTIVES; MEDICATION; SAFETY; INDIVIDUALS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/hex.70134
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMost people with mental ill health want to be involved in decision-making about their care, many mental health professionals now recognise the importance of this (at least in-principle) and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities enshrines the ethical imperative to support people in making their own treatment decisions. Nonetheless, there are widespread reports of people with mental ill health being excluded from decision-making about their treatment in practice.ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed method research on interventions to improve opportunities for the involvement of mental healthcare service users in treatment planning. We sought to consolidate and understand the evidence on the outcomes of shared and supported decision-making for people with mental ill health.MethodsSeven databases were searched and 5137 articles were screened. Articles were included if they reported on an intervention for adult service users, were published between 2008 and October 2023 and were in English. Evidence in the 140 included articles was synthesised according to the JBI guidance on Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews.ResultsThere was evidence relating to the effects of these interventions on a range of outcomes for people with mental ill health, including on: suicidal crisis, symptoms, recovery, hospital admissions, treatment engagement and on the use of coercion by health professionals. There is favourable evidence for these types of interventions in improving some outcomes for people with mental ill health, more so than treatment-as-usual. For other outcomes, the evidence is preliminary but promising. Some areas for caution are also identified.ConclusionsThe review indicates that when the involvement of people with mental ill health in treatment planning is supported, there can be improved outcomes for their health and care. Areas for future research are highlighted.Patient or Public ContributionThis systematic review has been guided at all stages by a researcher with experience of mental health service use, who does not wish to be identified at this point in time. The findings may inform organisations, researchers and practitioners on the benefits of implementing supported decision-making, for the greater involvement of people with mental ill health in their healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [1] Pathare S., Shields L.S., Supported Decision-Making for Persons With Mental Illness: A Review, Public Health Reviews, 34, 2, (2012)
  • [2] Farrelly S., Brown G., Rose D., Et al., What Service Users With Psychotic Disorders Want in a Mental Health Crisis or Relapse: Thematic Analysis of Joint Crisis Plans, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 10, pp. 1609-1617, (2014)
  • [3] Slade M., Implementing Shared Decision Making in Routine Mental Health Care, World Psychiatry, 16, pp. 146-153, (2017)
  • [4] Etingen B., Hessinger J.D., Hunley H.A., Training Providers in Shared Decision Making for Trauma Treatment Planning, Psychological Services, 19, 1, pp. 125-133, (2022)
  • [5] Stephenson L.A., Gergel T., Gieselmann A., Et al., Advance Decision Making in Bipolar: A Systematic Review, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, (2020)
  • [6] Dye S., An Audit of the Use of Advance Statements Surrounding Management of Disturbed Behaviour on a PICU, Journal of Psychiatric Intensive Care, 7, 1, pp. 27-33, (2011)
  • [7] Kumar T.R., John S., Gopal S., Et al., Psychiatric Advance Statements: An Indian Experience, International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 59, 6, pp. 531-534, (2013)
  • [8] Calcedo-Barba A., Fructuoso A., Martinez-Raga J., Paz S., Sanchez de Carmona M., Vicens E., A Meta-Review of Literature Reviews Assessing the Capacity of Patients With Severe Mental Disorders to Make Decisions About Their Healthcare, BMC Psychiatry, 20, 1, (2020)
  • [9] Beitinger R., Kissling W., Hamann J., Trends and Perspectives of Shared Decision-Making in Schizophrenia and Related Disorders, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 27, 3, pp. 222-229, (2014)
  • [10] Ruchlewska A., Mulder C.L., Van der Waal R., Kamperman A., Van der Gaag M., Crisis Plans Facilitated by Patient Advocates Are Better Than Those Drawn Up by Clinicians: Results From an RCT, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41, 2, pp. 220-227, (2014)