The value of self-reported variables in epilepsy monitoring and management. A systematic scoping review

被引:1
作者
Biondi, Andrea [1 ]
Zabler, Nicolas [2 ]
Kalousios, Sotirios [2 ]
Simblett, Sara [3 ]
Laiou, Petroula [1 ]
Viana, Pedro F. [1 ,4 ]
Duempelmann, Matthias [2 ]
Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas [2 ]
Richardson, Mark P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci IOPPN, London, England
[2] Univ Freiburg, Univ Med Ctr, Epilepsy Ctr, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Psychol, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci IoPPN, London, England
[4] Univ Lisbon, Fac Med, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY | 2024年 / 122卷
关键词
Epilepsy; E; -diary; Prediction; Seizure count; Self-report; Documentation; SMARTPHONE APPLICATIONS; GENERALIZED EPILEPSY; SEIZURE FREQUENCY; ACCEPTABILITY; PREDICTION; PEOPLE; ADULTS; CARE; FEASIBILITY; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.seizure.2024.10.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Self-reported records of seizure occurrences, seizure triggers and prodromal symptoms via paper or electronic tools are essential components of epilepsy management. Despite recent studies indicating that this information could hold important clinical value, the adoption of self-reported information in clinical practice is inconsistent and of uncertain value. Methods: We performed a systematic scoping review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of different digital libraries was used (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycINFO). The review examined acceptability, adherence, and ability to self-report or predict seizures, along with innovative applications of self-reported data. We comprehensively outline study characteristics, key results, and identified strengths and limitations. Results: Sixty-eight full-text and two abstracts were included, where a total of 10 electronic tools were identified. Studies revealed high patient interest and acceptable adherence, particularly when tools were well-designed, and data shared with healthcare providers. While patients faced challenges in self-reporting or predicting seizures, a subgroup exhibited higher accuracy and compliance. Studies underscored the value of self-report information in identifying seizure clusters, understanding associations between self-reported seizure frequency and triggers, developing personalized seizure risk, forecasting and prediction models, and the potential benefits when integrated with wearable or implantable devices. Limitations included population selection, repeated dataset use, and the absence of gold standards for seizure counting. Conclusion: Personalizing tools to collect self-report information, integrating them with wearable technologies, utilizing collected data for clinical outcomes, and merging them with electronic health records could provide a reliable resource for epilepsy monitoring and management.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 143
页数:25
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Self-Management Apps for People With Epilepsy: Systematic Analysis
    Alzamanan, Mohsen Zaied
    Lim, Kheng-Seang
    Ismail, Maizatul Akmar
    Ghani, Norjihan Abdul
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (05):
  • [2] Bidwell J, 2018, Seizures, V69
  • [3] Feasibility and acceptability of an ultra-long-term at-home EEG monitoring system (EEG@HOME) for people with epilepsy
    Biondi, Andrea
    Simblett, Sara K.
    Viana, Pedro F.
    Laiou, Petroula
    Fiori, Anna M. G.
    Nurse, Ewan
    Schreuder, Martijn
    Pal, Deb K.
    Richardson, Mark P.
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2024, 151
  • [4] Noninvasive mobile EEG as a tool for seizure monitoring and management: A systematic review
    Biondi, Andrea
    Santoro, Viviana
    Viana, Pedro F.
    Laiou, Petroula
    Pal, Deb K.
    Bruno, Elisa
    Richardson, Mark P.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2022, 63 (05) : 1041 - 1063
  • [5] Subjective seizure counts by epilepsy clinical drug trial participants are not reliable
    Blachut, Barbara
    Hoppe, Christian
    Surges, Rainer
    Elger, Christian
    Helmstaedter, Christoph
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2017, 67 : 122 - 127
  • [6] Counting seizures: The primary outcome measure in epileptology from the patients' perspective
    Blachut, Barbara
    Hoppe, Christian
    Surges, Rainer
    Stahl, Jutta
    Elger, Christian E.
    Helmstaedter, Christoph
    [J]. SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2015, 29 : 97 - 103
  • [7] Patient awareness of seizures
    Blum, DE
    Eskola, J
    Bortz, JJ
    Fisher, RS
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1996, 47 (01) : 260 - 264
  • [8] Seizure Diaries and Forecasting With Wearables: Epilepsy Monitoring Outside the Clinic
    Brinkmann, Benjamin H.
    Karoly, Philippa J.
    Nurse, Ewan S.
    Dumanis, Sonya B.
    Nasseri, Mona
    Viana, Pedro F.
    Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
    Freestone, Dean R.
    Worrell, Greg
    Richardson, Mark P.
    Cook, Mark J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [9] Wearable technology in epilepsy: The views of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals
    Bruno, Elisa
    Simblett, Sara
    Lang, Alexandra
    Biondi, Andrea
    Odoi, Clarissa
    Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
    Wykes, Til
    Richardson, Mark P.
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 85 : 141 - 149
  • [10] Opinion and Special Articles: Self-management in epilepsy Web-based seizure tracking applications
    Casassa, Charles
    Levit, Elle Rathbun
    Goldenholz, Daniel M.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (21) : E2027 - E2030