Comparative Analysis of Federated and Centralized Learning Systems in Predicting Cellular Downlink Throughput Using CNN

被引:0
作者
Nugroho, Kukuh [1 ]
Hendrawan [1 ]
Iskandar [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teknol Bandung, Sch Elect Engn & Informat, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2025年 / 13卷
关键词
Throughput; Predictive models; Servers; Convolutional neural networks; Data models; Performance evaluation; Machine learning; Hidden Markov models; Downlink; Bandwidth; Federated learning; throughput prediction; cellular network; distributed learning; convolutional neural network; dropout;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3528527
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Data traffic in cellular networks has surged due to the growing number of users and high-bandwidth applications. The quality of service (QoS) for users will degrade if the network resources cannot handle the increasing traffic volume. A user's application requires a minimum throughput to maintain QoS levels above the Service Level Agreement (SLA) promised by the operator. The network's ability to handle traffic growth will depend on well-prepared network resource management. KPI traffic prediction is one solution to anticipate traffic surges. This study utilized Federated Learning (FL) as a machine learning paradigm and employed CNN as a model to predict throughput in the cellular network. The efficacy of the model is compared with Centralized Learning (CL) and other deep learning models, including MLP, RNN, LSTM, and GRU. The experimental results indicate that the CNN model implemented in FL outperforms both CL and the other models. The number of rounds used in the FL system is held in two rounds, and the model's performance remains steady with an increasing number of clients, showing superior performance compared to CL.
引用
收藏
页码:22745 / 22763
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] SMET: Semantic Mapping of CVE to ATT&CK and Its Application to Cybersecurity
    Abdeen, Basel
    Al-Shaer, Ehab
    Singhal, Anoop
    Khan, Latifur
    Hamlen, Kevin
    [J]. DATA AND APPLICATIONS SECURITY AND PRIVACY XXXVII, DBSEC 2023, 2023, 13942 : 243 - 260
  • [2] A Survey on Federated Learning: The Journey From Centralized to Distributed On-Site Learning and Beyond
    AbdulRahman, Sawsan
    Tout, Hanine
    Ould-Slimane, Hakima
    Mourad, Azzam
    Talhi, Chamseddine
    Guizani, Mohsen
    [J]. IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2021, 8 (07): : 5476 - 5497
  • [3] Abdulrahman Y., 2019, Wireless Mesh Networking, DOI [10.1002/9781119580157.ch12, DOI 10.1002/9781119580157.CH12]
  • [4] FL-PERF: Predicting TCP Throughput with Federated Learning
    Aung, Han Nay
    Ohsaki, Hiroyuki
    [J]. IEEE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, GLOBECOM, 2023, : 4332 - 4337
  • [5] Bezerra J., 2023, P C COMP SCI COMP EN, P2536, DOI [10.1109/csce60160.2023.00407, DOI 10.1109/CSCE60160.2023.00407]
  • [6] Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey
    Borisov, Vadim
    Leemann, Tobias
    Sessler, Kathrin
    Haug, Johannes
    Pawelczyk, Martin
    Kasneci, Gjergji
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2024, 35 (06) : 7499 - 7519
  • [7] Brendan McMahan H., 2016, arXiv
  • [8] Proposal for bandwidth prediction using Hybrid Division Model
    Cadovski, Ognjen
    Ilic, Velibor
    Rikic, Bojan
    Kovacevic, Branimir
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS (ICCE), 2021,
  • [9] Chauhan R, 2018, 2018 FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SECURE CYBER COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (ICSCCC 2018), P278, DOI 10.1109/ICSCCC.2018.8703316
  • [10] Chen Tingting, 2020, 2020 7th International Forum on Electrical Engineering and Automation (IFEEA), P753, DOI 10.1109/IFEEA51475.2020.00160