No accelerated progression of subclinical atherosclerosis with integrase strand transfer inhibitors compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia-Abellan, Javier [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Garcia, Jose A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Padilla, Sergio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fernandez-Gonzalez, Marta [3 ,4 ]
Agullo, Vanesa [2 ]
Mascarell, Paula [1 ,2 ]
Botella, Angela [4 ]
Gutierrez, Felix [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Masia, Mar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Elche, Infect Dis Unit, Alicante, Spain
[2] Univ Miguel Hernandez Elche, Alicante, Spain
[3] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Infecc CIBERINFEC, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Gen Univ Elche, Infect Dis Unit, Alicante, Spain
关键词
INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS; VIRUS-INFECTED PATIENTS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HIV; RISK; IMMUNODEFICIENCY; RALTEGRAVIR; EFAVIRENZ;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkae383
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: The role of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) in the cardiovascular risk of people with HIV is controversial. Objectives: To assess the association of INSTI to subclinical atherosclerosis progression measured with the carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). Methods: Prospective study in virologically suppressed people with HIV receiving INSTI- or NNRTI-based regimens. cIMT was measured at baseline, 48 and 96 weeks. cIMT progression was analysed both as a continuous and categorical variable, defined as cIMT increase >= 10% and/or new carotid plaque. Adjustments through Cox proportional hazard regression and linear mixed models, and propensity score matching were conducted. Results: 190 participants were recruited and 173 completed the 96 week follow-up.107 (56.3%) were receiving an INSTI-containing, 128 (67.4%) a NNRTI-containing and 45 (23.7%) a NNRTI plus an INSTI-containing regimen. The overall median (IQR) 2-year change of cIMT was 0.029 (-0.041 to 0.124) mm; 87 (45.8%) participants experienced a cIMT increase >= 10%, of whom 54 (28.4%) developed a new carotid plaque. Adjusted Cox regression showed no differences between INSTI and NNRTI groups in the categorical 2-year progression of cIMT, both including or excluding participants receiving INSTI +NNRTI. Similar results were observed for the continuous cIMT increase through adjusted linear mixed models. Propensity score matching showed no significant differences in the 2 year cIMT change between treatment groups [0.049 mm (-0.031-0.103) in the INSTI group versus 0.047 mm (-0.023-0.115) in the NNRTI group; P = 0.647]. cIMT progression was associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions: INSTI-based regimens are not associated with increased progression of subclinical atherosclerosis when compared to NNRTI.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 137
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Join Forces with Integrase Inhibitors to Combat HIV
    Himmel, Daniel M.
    Arnold, Eddy
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2020, 13 (06) : 1 - 26
  • [2] The flourishing syntheses of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
    Pedersen, OS
    Pedersen, EB
    SYNTHESIS-STUTTGART, 2000, (04): : 479 - 495
  • [3] Increased carotid intima-media thickness in HIV patients treated with protease inhibitors as compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
    Sankatsing, Raaj R.
    Wit, Ferdinand W.
    Vogel, Martin
    de Groot, Eric
    Brinkman, Kees
    Rockstroh, Juergen K.
    Kastelein, John J. P.
    Stroes, Erik S. G.
    Reiss, Peter
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2009, 202 (02) : 589 - 595
  • [4] Structures and activities of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs).
    De Clercq, E
    MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 2000, 30 (07): : 421 - 430
  • [5] Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with HIV-1 exposed to integrase inhibitors, protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: an observational study
    Floridia, Marco
    Dalzero, Serena
    Giacomet, Vania
    Tamburrini, Enrica
    Masuelli, Giulia
    Savasi, Valeria
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    Tassis, Beatrice
    Franceschetti, Laura
    Antoni, Anna Maria Degli
    Sansone, Matilde
    Guaraldi, Giovanni
    Vimercati, Antonella
    Meloni, Alessandra
    Ravizza, Marina
    INFECTION, 2020, 48 (02) : 249 - 258
  • [6] Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
    Patrick F. Smith
    Robert DiCenzo
    Gene D. Morse
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2001, 40 : 893 - 905
  • [7] Liver toxicity induced by non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
    Rivero, Antonio
    Mira, Jose A.
    Pineda, Juan A.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 59 (03) : 342 - 346
  • [8] Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: the NNRTI boom
    Pedersen, OS
    Pedersen, EB
    ANTIVIRAL CHEMISTRY & CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 10 (06) : 285 - 314
  • [9] Toxicity of non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors
    Kontorinis, N
    Dieterich, DT
    SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE, 2003, 23 (02) : 173 - 181
  • [10] Should non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors be combined?
    Kappelhoff B.S.
    Huitema A.D.R.
    Beijnen J.H.
    Drugs in R & D, 2005, 6 (2) : 61 - 69