Recent Insights into the Evolving Role of the Gut Microbiome in Critical Care

被引:0
作者
Lee, Seoho [1 ]
Wischmeyer, Paul E. [2 ]
Mintz, Cyrus D. [1 ]
Serbanescu, Mara A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Sch Med, Phipps 455 1800 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD 21212 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Sch Med, 5692 HAFS Box 3094,2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Microbiome; Critical care; Nutrition; Gut hyperpermeability; Bacterial extracellular vesicles; EPITHELIAL BARRIER; ILL PATIENTS; ENTERAL NUTRITION; BACTERIAL; MECHANISMS; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; ANTIBIOTICS; DYSFUNCTION; SECRETION; DYSBIOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ccc.2024.11.002
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The data we have summarized all lead to the conclusion that disturbances in the gut microbiota sustained throughout critical illness-some of which are potentially modifiable-may contribute to injury that is independent of the primary cause of the patient's need for ICU care. However, clinical studies of microbiome-targeted interventions including the administration of prebiotic fiber and pro/synbiotics have failed to show consistent benefit in large RCTs or systematic meta-analyses, even despite strong signals indicating clinical benefit in individual studies. While these findings are at odds with numerous conditions faced in the outpatient setting where prebiotic/probiotic therapy have had readily demonstrable positive impacts (eg, autoimmune mediated diseases, cancer therapy, GI disorders, and COVID-19 pneumonia)(107,10)8 and it implies a knowledge gap that will require substantial future research both in the clinical and translational settings. We hypothesize that the absence of benefit observed in the current literature is due to a lack of specificity of treatment-all ICU patients at all times in their treatment course do not benefit from the currently available therapies, which may be poorly targeted to the type of dysbiosis seen in this setting. We propose that focus should be centered in several areas that are likely to be highly productive: 1. Understanding how to parse different types of ICU patients and different phases of their care as it relates to putatively harmful states of dysbiosis through both clinical and translational approaches; 2. Clarifying mechanisms under control of the HGM in the context of the ICU environment and identifying in which patients these mechanisms are clinically relevant; and 3. Designing therapies for the microbiome that are reflective of what is known about ICU-induced dysbiosis, taking into account the implications of disturbances in gut microbial ecological interactions, as well as gut barrier integrity. The types of microbiome-targeted interventions are rapidly increasing, and a better understanding of which therapies should be provided, and at what point in disease course, and to what population of patients has the potential for high impact in intensive care medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 396
页数:18
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [1] The gut microbiome's role in the development, maintenance, and outcomes of sepsis
    Adelman, Max W.
    Woodworth, Michael H.
    Langelier, Charles
    Busch, Lindsay M.
    Kempker, Jordan
    Kraft, Colleen
    Martin, Greg S.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 24 (01)
  • [2] Gut microbiota profiles in critically ill patients, potential biomarkers and risk variables for sepsis
    Agudelo-Ochoa, Gloria M.
    Valdes-Duque, Beatriz E.
    Giraldo-Giraldo, Nubia A.
    Jaillier-Ramirez, Ana M.
    Giraldo-Villa, Adriana
    Acevedo-Castano, Irene
    Yepes-Molina, Monica A.
    Barbosa-Barbosa, Janeth
    Benitez-Paez, Alfonso
    [J]. GUT MICROBES, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [3] A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome
    Almeida, Alexandre
    Nayfach, Stephen
    Boland, Miguel
    Strozzi, Francesco
    Beracochea, Martin
    Shi, Zhou Jason
    Pollard, Katherine S.
    Sakharova, Ekaterina
    Parks, Donovan H.
    Hugenholtz, Philip
    Segata, Nicola
    Kyrpides, Nikos C.
    Finn, Robert D.
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 39 (01) : 105 - 114
  • [4] ArandaDiaz A., 2023, bioRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2023.01.13.523996, DOI 10.1101/2023.01.13.523996]
  • [5] Associations between systemic inflammation and intestinal permeability with Onodera's prognostic nutritional index in critically ill patients
    Ardehali, Seyed Hossein
    Eslamian, Ghazaleh
    Malek, Shirin
    [J]. ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 36 (04) : 361 - 368
  • [6] Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut
    Baumler, Andreas J.
    Sperandio, Vanessa
    [J]. NATURE, 2016, 535 (7610) : 85 - 93
  • [7] Intestinal effect of the probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 and its OMV
    Behrouzi, Ava
    Mazaheri, Hoora
    Falsafi, Sarvenaz
    Tavassol, Zahra Hoseini
    Moshiri, Arfa
    Siadat, Seyed Davar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2020, 19 (01) : 597 - 604
  • [8] Among Live and Dead Bacteria, the Optimization of Sample Collection and Processing Remains Essential in Recovering Gut Microbiota Components
    Bellali, Sara
    Lagier, Jean-Christophe
    Raoult, Didier
    Khalil, Jacques Bou
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [9] What to do about the leaky gut
    Camilleri, Michael
    Vella, Adrian
    [J]. GUT, 2022, 71 (02) : 424 - 435
  • [10] The Healthy Human Blood Microbiome: Fact or Fiction?
    Castillo, Diego J.
    Rifkin, Riaan F.
    Cowan, Don A.
    Potgieter, Marnie
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 9