Gang injunction, What's your function? Investigating the relationship between civil gang injunctions and gang associates' patterns of association

被引:0
作者
Valasik, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Criminol & Criminal Justice, 430 Farrah Hall, Box 870320, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Street gangs; Civil gang injunctions; Social networks; Legal hybridity; Policing; BROKEN WINDOWS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; VIOLENT CRIME; PUBLIC SPACE; LOS-ANGELES; MEMBERSHIP; IMPACT; RISK; TERRITORIALITY; HOMICIDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102339
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Purpose: The current study examines the influence of civil gang injunctions (CGIs) on the patterns of association among gang associates at the individual- and group-levels in East Los Angeles. Methods: The analysis is divided into two parts examining Field Investigation (FI) stops conducted by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). First, how do CGIs influence an individual gang associate's patterns of association is investigated with individual- and event-level data. Next, a case-study approach employing social network analysis is used to examine if CGIs produce observable and consistent changes to the publicly observed social structure of an enjoined gang. Results: Findings suggest that CGIs are able to influence the associating patterns of gang associates at the individual-level. That is, enjoined gang associates are less likely to loiter in public, hang out in their gang's known set space, associate with fellow members, and are less visible to police. At the group-level an enjoined gang's group structure either becomes disrupted by the presence of a CGI or conversely fosters an increased connectedness among associates. Conclusions: It appears that CGIs inhibit the public loitering of individual gang associates. At the group-level, divergent findings illustrate the complexity of gang associates' patterns of association and the challenges when attempting to alter them through suppression strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 142 条
  • [71] Klein MalcolmW., 1998, Problem Oriented Policing: Crime-Specific Problems Critical Issues and Making POP Work
  • [72] GROUPS, GANGS, AND COHESIVENESS
    KLEIN, MW
    CRAWFORD, LY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 1967, 4 (01) : 63 - 75
  • [73] Broken Windows, Informal Social Control, and Crime: Assessing Causality in Empirical Studies
    Lanfear, Charles C.
    Matsueda, Ross L.
    Beach, Lindsey R.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRIMINOLOGY, VOL 3, 2020, 3 : 97 - 120
  • [74] INFRINGEMENT SYSTEMS IN AUSTRALIA A precarious blurring of civil and criminal sanctions?
    Lansdell, Gaye
    Eriksson, Anna
    Saunders, Bernadette
    Brown, Meredith
    [J]. ALTERNATIVE LAW JOURNAL, 2012, 37 (01) : 41 - 45
  • [75] Leap J., 2012, Jumped in: What gangs taught me about violence, drugs, love and redemption
  • [76] Leovy Jill., 2015, GHETTOSIDE TRUE STOR
  • [77] Maxson C.L., 2004, AM YOUTH GANGS MILLE, P375
  • [78] Maxson C.L., 2005, CRIMINOL PUBLIC POL, V4, P577, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-9133.2005.00305.X
  • [79] Maxson C. L., 1999, Perceptions of crime and policing in Los Angeles neighborhoods: Descriptive results from a survey of four LAPD areas
  • [80] Maxson CherylL., 2003, Policing Gangs and Youth Violence, P239