Gang injunction, What's your function? Investigating the relationship between civil gang injunctions and gang associates' patterns of association

被引:0
作者
Valasik, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Criminol & Criminal Justice, 430 Farrah Hall, Box 870320, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Street gangs; Civil gang injunctions; Social networks; Legal hybridity; Policing; BROKEN WINDOWS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; VIOLENT CRIME; PUBLIC SPACE; LOS-ANGELES; MEMBERSHIP; IMPACT; RISK; TERRITORIALITY; HOMICIDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102339
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Purpose: The current study examines the influence of civil gang injunctions (CGIs) on the patterns of association among gang associates at the individual- and group-levels in East Los Angeles. Methods: The analysis is divided into two parts examining Field Investigation (FI) stops conducted by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). First, how do CGIs influence an individual gang associate's patterns of association is investigated with individual- and event-level data. Next, a case-study approach employing social network analysis is used to examine if CGIs produce observable and consistent changes to the publicly observed social structure of an enjoined gang. Results: Findings suggest that CGIs are able to influence the associating patterns of gang associates at the individual-level. That is, enjoined gang associates are less likely to loiter in public, hang out in their gang's known set space, associate with fellow members, and are less visible to police. At the group-level an enjoined gang's group structure either becomes disrupted by the presence of a CGI or conversely fosters an increased connectedness among associates. Conclusions: It appears that CGIs inhibit the public loitering of individual gang associates. At the group-level, divergent findings illustrate the complexity of gang associates' patterns of association and the challenges when attempting to alter them through suppression strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 142 条
  • [1] Allan Edward., 2004, Civil Gang Abatement: The Effectiveness and Implications of Policing by Injunction
  • [2] Anderson J., 2009, Gang Prosecution Manual
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, People v. Krazy Ass Mexicans
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury, 2003-2004 Final Report, P169
  • [5] [Anonymous], Form and Manner of a Report to a taxpayer on the stage of completion of an audit in terms of section 42(1) of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (Act No. 28 of 2011) GN 788 GG 35733 of 1 October 2012 available at https://www.sars.gov.za/wpcontent/uploads/Legal/SecLegis/LAPD-LSec-TAdm-PN-2012-02-Notice-788-GG-35733-1-October-2012.pdf (accessed 30 November 2022).
  • [6] [Anonymous], Nystrand, M. (2006). The social and historical context for writing research. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (Vols. 1-Book, 1-Section). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • [8] Beckett Katherine., 2010, Banished: The New Social Control in Urban America
  • [9] Evolving Patterns of Aggression: Investigating the Structure of Gang Violence during the Era of Civil Gang Injunctions
    Bichler, Gisela
    Norris, Alexis
    Ibarra, Citlalik
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 9 (11): : 1 - 19
  • [10] Explaining the directionality of gang violence with court records
    Bichler, Gisela
    Norris, Alexis
    Ibarra, Citlalik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGGRESSION CONFLICT AND PEACE RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (2-3) : 83 - 95