Conditions for Co-creation: Lessons from a planning tool for rural facility decline

被引:0
作者
Christiaanse, Suzan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Social & Behav Sci ESSB, Erasmus Social Design Hub, Mandeville Gebouw,Burgemeester Oudlaan 50,Postbus, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Social & Behav Sci ESSB, Erasmus Social Design Hub, Mandeville Gebouw,Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Co-creation; Planning; Services; Serious game; Co-design; Prototyping; PLACE ATTACHMENT; DESIGN THINKING; SERIOUS GAMES; POLICY; IDENTITY; CLOSURE; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103512
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Declining levels of facilities and services are a major source of concern in rural areas across Europe. Local facilities can have different individual or communal meanings, and closure can lead to a sense of loss. While many scholars advocate for empowering rural communities in the collective coping process, few studies analyse examples of co-creative planning tools. This paper describes and evaluates the development and implementation of 'Facility-Wise', an analogue serious game for co-creative planning and self-organization of facilities and services. The development of Facility-Wise followed an abductive and design-led approach through a participatory process. Five real cases in North-West Fryslan (Netherlands), and one fictional case, were used for prototyping. In the final format a moderator leads participants through various discussion-elements and helps them to explore future scenarios for health care, education, sports, cultural or private facilities. This paper provides a roadmap for how to develop and use co-creative planning tools, and critically reflects on the prerequisites that are needed for successful implementation. Six prerequisites to successfully implement tools for co-creation are discussed. When these conditions are met, it is possible to mitigate negative experiences of rural facility-decline and empower communities in the collective coping process. However, it can be a challenge to be truly inclusive since this cocreative tool requires time, effort and a certain level of collective efficacy to participate.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Abt ClarkC., 1970, SERIOUS GAMES, DOI DOI 10.1177/000276427001400113
  • [2] Participatory game prototyping ? balancing domain content and playability in a serious game design for the energy transition
    Ampatzidou, Cristina
    Gugerell, Katharina
    [J]. CODESIGN-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COCREATION IN DESIGN AND THE ARTS, 2019, 15 (04): : 345 - 360
  • [3] All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance
    Ampatzidou, Cristina
    Gugerell, Katharina
    Constantinescu, Teodora
    Devisch, Oswald
    Jauschneg, Martina
    Berger, Martin
    [J]. URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 3 (01): : 34 - 46
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, Participation in design things, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1795234.1795248, 10.1145/1795234.1795248]
  • [5] Ansell Torfing, 2021, Public Governance as Co-creation-a Strategy for Revitalising the Public Sector and Rejuvenating Democracy
  • [6] Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation
    Anton, Charis E.
    Lawrence, Carmen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 40 : 451 - 461
  • [7] LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    ARNSTEIN, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04): : 216 - 224
  • [8] Bailey E, 2016, PAP SOC REPRESENT, V25
  • [9] Rural communities' energy metabolisms in Portugal: Between territorial injustices and far-right populism
    Batel, Susana
    Valquaresma, Andreia
    Alba, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2024, 111
  • [10] Bjögvinsson E, 2012, DES ISSUES, V28, P101