Open or Closed? Management of Skin Incisions After Emergency General Surgery Laparotomies

被引:1
作者
Srinivas, Shruthi [1 ]
Coleman, Julia R. [1 ]
Baselice, Holly [1 ]
Scarlet, Sara [1 ]
Tracy, Brett M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Emergency general surgery; Hollow viscus perforation; Laparotomy; Skin management; Surgical site infection; Wound class; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY; RISK-FACTORS; COLORECTAL SURGERY; TRAUMA LAPAROTOMY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: We sought to determine if there was a relationship between skin management and surgical site infections (SSIs) among patients undergoing a laparotomy for emergency general surgery (EGS). We hypothesize that skin closure technique is not associated with SSI. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of adult patients (>18 y) who underwent an exploratory laparotomy for EGS conditions within 6 h of surgical consultation from 2015 to 2019. Patients whose fascia was not closed during the index operation were excluded. Patients were divided into groups: open skin (OS) and closed skin (CS). OS included negative pressure wound therapy or wet-to-dry gauze; CS included closure with staples or sutures. Our primary outcome was the rate of SSI. Results: The cohort comprised 388 patients: 42.3% OS (n = 164) and 57.7% CS (n = 224). The OS group had greater rates of systemic inflammatory response syndrome [SIRS] (54.9% versus 27.7%, P < 0.0001), hollow viscus perforation [HVP] (71.3% versus 20.5%, P < 0.0001), and peritoneal drains (51.2% versus 17.9%, P < 0.0001). Rates of OS management increased as wound class severity increased (0% [I] versus 12.2% [II] versus 15.9% [III] versus 72% [IV], P < 0.0001). The SSI rate for the cohort was 3.6% (n = 14); there was no difference in SSI rates (2.7% versus 4.9%, P = 0.3) between the CS or OS groups. Median length of stay was longer for the OS group (10 d versus 6.5 d, P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of OS management were SIRS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.93, P = 0.04), HVP (aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.09-3.8, P = 0.03), and class III/IV wounds (aOR 8.65, 95% CI 4.43-16.89, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: OS management occurs more often in patients with SIRS, HVP, and dirty wounds after EGS laparotomies. However, we found no difference in SSI between groups, suggesting that skin closure can be considered in contaminated or dirty wounds. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 195
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The Association of Chronic Opioid Use with Resource Utilization and Outcomes after Emergency General Surgery [J].
Oliver, Joseph B. ;
Iyer, Urvya R. ;
Merchant, Aziz M. .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (02) :257-262
[42]   Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Imamura, Kazuhiro ;
Adachi, Kensuke ;
Sasaki, Ritsuko ;
Monma, Satoko ;
Shioiri, Sadaaki ;
Seyama, Yasuji ;
Miura, Masaru ;
Morikawa, Yoshihiko ;
Kaneko, Tetsuji .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (12) :2083-2092
[43]   Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Kazuhiro Imamura ;
Kensuke Adachi ;
Ritsuko Sasaki ;
Satoko Monma ;
Sadaaki Shioiri ;
Yasuji Seyama ;
Masaru Miura ;
Yoshihiko Morikawa ;
Tetsuji Kaneko .
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2016, 20 :2083-2092
[44]   Do antibacterial skin sutures reduce surgical site infections after elective open abdominal surgery? - Study protocol of a prospective, randomized controlled single center trial [J].
Matz, Daniel ;
Teuteberg, Saskia ;
Wiencierz, Andrea ;
Soysal, Savas Deniz ;
Heizmann, Oleg .
TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
[45]   Conservative management of minor anastomotic leakage after open elective colorectal surgery [J].
Paliogiannis, Panagiotis ;
Attene, Federico ;
Scognamillo, Fabrizio ;
Trignano, Emilio ;
Torre, Carlo ;
Pulighe, Fabio ;
Trignano, Mario .
ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2012, 83 (01) :25-28
[46]   Socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with greater mortality after high-risk emergency general surgery [J].
Cain, Brian T. ;
Horns, Joshua J. ;
Huang, Lyen C. ;
McCrum, Marta L. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2022, 92 (04) :691-700
[47]   Who's being left behind? Uninsured emergency general surgery admissions after the ACA [J].
Albini, Paul T. ;
Cochran-Yu, Megan R. ;
Godat, Laura N. ;
Costantini, Todd W. ;
Doucet, Jay J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 218 (06) :1102-1109
[48]   Geriatric rescue after surgery (GRAS) score to predict failure-to-rescue in geriatric emergency general surgery patients [J].
Khan, Muhammad ;
Azim, Asad ;
O'Keeffe, Terence ;
Jehan, Faisal ;
Kulvatunyou, Narong ;
Santino, Chelsey ;
Tang, Andrew ;
Vercruysse, Gary ;
Gries, Lynn ;
Joseph, Bellal .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 215 (01) :53-57
[49]   Surgical Site Infection after Primary Closure of High-Risk Surgical Wounds in Emergency General Surgery Laparotomy and Closed Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy [J].
Hall, Chad ;
Regner, Justin ;
Abernathy, Stephen ;
Isbell, Claire ;
Isbell, Travis ;
Kurek, Stan ;
Smith, Randall ;
Frazee, Richard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 228 (04) :393-397
[50]   Long-term outcomes of open versus closed rectal defect after transanal endoscopic microscopic surgery [J].
Altaf, Kiran ;
Slawik, Simone ;
Sochorova, Dana ;
Gahunia, Sukhpreet ;
Andrews, Timothy ;
Kehoe, Ashley ;
Ahmed, Shakil .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (11) :2904-2910