Open or Closed? Management of Skin Incisions After Emergency General Surgery Laparotomies

被引:0
作者
Srinivas, Shruthi [1 ]
Coleman, Julia R. [1 ]
Baselice, Holly [1 ]
Scarlet, Sara [1 ]
Tracy, Brett M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Emergency general surgery; Hollow viscus perforation; Laparotomy; Skin management; Surgical site infection; Wound class; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY; RISK-FACTORS; COLORECTAL SURGERY; TRAUMA LAPAROTOMY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: We sought to determine if there was a relationship between skin management and surgical site infections (SSIs) among patients undergoing a laparotomy for emergency general surgery (EGS). We hypothesize that skin closure technique is not associated with SSI. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of adult patients (>18 y) who underwent an exploratory laparotomy for EGS conditions within 6 h of surgical consultation from 2015 to 2019. Patients whose fascia was not closed during the index operation were excluded. Patients were divided into groups: open skin (OS) and closed skin (CS). OS included negative pressure wound therapy or wet-to-dry gauze; CS included closure with staples or sutures. Our primary outcome was the rate of SSI. Results: The cohort comprised 388 patients: 42.3% OS (n = 164) and 57.7% CS (n = 224). The OS group had greater rates of systemic inflammatory response syndrome [SIRS] (54.9% versus 27.7%, P < 0.0001), hollow viscus perforation [HVP] (71.3% versus 20.5%, P < 0.0001), and peritoneal drains (51.2% versus 17.9%, P < 0.0001). Rates of OS management increased as wound class severity increased (0% [I] versus 12.2% [II] versus 15.9% [III] versus 72% [IV], P < 0.0001). The SSI rate for the cohort was 3.6% (n = 14); there was no difference in SSI rates (2.7% versus 4.9%, P = 0.3) between the CS or OS groups. Median length of stay was longer for the OS group (10 d versus 6.5 d, P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of OS management were SIRS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.93, P = 0.04), HVP (aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.09-3.8, P = 0.03), and class III/IV wounds (aOR 8.65, 95% CI 4.43-16.89, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: OS management occurs more often in patients with SIRS, HVP, and dirty wounds after EGS laparotomies. However, we found no difference in SSI between groups, suggesting that skin closure can be considered in contaminated or dirty wounds. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 195
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identifying Factors Associated With Code Status Changes After Emergency General Surgery
    Srinivas, Shruthi
    Villarreal, Michael E.
    Baselice, Holly
    Bergus, Katherine C.
    Waterman, Brittany
    Henderson, Katelyn
    Scarlet, Sara
    Young, Andrew J.
    Helkin, Alex
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 294 : 150 - 159
  • [22] Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use After Emergency General Surgery
    Young Kim
    Alexander R. Cortez
    Koffi Wima
    Vikrom K. Dhar
    Krishna P. Athota
    Jason J. Schrager
    Timothy A. Pritts
    Michael J. Edwards
    Shimul A. Shah
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2018, 22 : 1098 - 1103
  • [23] Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use After Emergency General Surgery
    Kim, Young
    Cortez, Alexander R.
    Wima, Koffi
    Dhar, Vikrom K.
    Athota, Krishna P.
    Schrager, Jason J.
    Pritts, Timothy A.
    Edwards, Michael J.
    Shah, Shimul A.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (06) : 1098 - 1103
  • [24] Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Tsujinaka, Toshimasa
    Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi
    Fujita, Junya
    Endo, Shunji
    Kawada, Junji
    Nakahira, Shin
    Shimokawa, Toshio
    Kobayashi, Shogo
    Yamasaki, Makoto
    Akamaru, Yusuke
    Miyamoto, Atsushi
    Mizushima, Tsunekazu
    Shimizu, Junzo
    Umeshita, Koji
    Ito, Toshinori
    Doki, Yuichiro
    Mori, Masaki
    LANCET, 2013, 382 (9898) : 1105 - 1112
  • [25] Surgical Wound Complications after Colorectal Surgery with Single-Use Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Surgical Dressing over Closed Incisions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Leon Arellano, Miguel
    Barragan Serrano, Cristina
    Guedea, Manuela
    Garcia Perez, Juan Carlos
    Sanz Ortega, Gonzalo
    Guevara-Martinez, Jenny
    Gomez Abril, Segundo
    Gonzalez Puga, Cristina
    Arroyo, Antonio
    Cantero Cid, Ramon
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2021, 34 (12) : 657 - 661
  • [26] Hospitalization After Open Colectomy: Expectations and Practice in General Surgery
    Riccardo Nascimbeni
    Rita Cadoni
    Francesco Di Fabio
    Claudio Casella
    Bruno Salerni
    Surgery Today, 2005, 35 : 371 - 376
  • [27] Hospitalization after open colectomy: Expectations and practice in general surgery
    Nascimbeni, R
    Cadoni, R
    Di Fabio, F
    Casella, C
    Salerni, B
    SURGERY TODAY, 2005, 35 (05) : 371 - 376
  • [28] Patient experiences of closed-incision negative pressure therapy on groin incisions after discharge following peripheral arterial surgery: A qualitative study
    Graversen, Camilla Borch
    Missel, Malene
    Jakobsen, Sally
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR NURSING, 2023, 41 (04) : 171 - 179
  • [29] Emergency reoperation after open heart surgery: ten years of experience
    Yuksel, Volkan
    Huseyin, Serhat
    Canbaz, Suat
    Ege, Turan
    Sunar, Hasan
    KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2013, 10 (03): : 195 - 198
  • [30] In their own words: recovery after emergency general surgery in the older patient
    Ho, Vanessa P.
    Roach, Mary Joan
    Berg, Kristen A.
    Deverakonda, Divya L.
    Kanuika, Peter
    Arko, Brianna
    Perzynski, Adam T.
    TRAUMA SURGERY & ACUTE CARE OPEN, 2023, 8 (01)