Open or Closed? Management of Skin Incisions After Emergency General Surgery Laparotomies

被引:0
|
作者
Srinivas, Shruthi [1 ]
Coleman, Julia R. [1 ]
Baselice, Holly [1 ]
Scarlet, Sara [1 ]
Tracy, Brett M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Emergency general surgery; Hollow viscus perforation; Laparotomy; Skin management; Surgical site infection; Wound class; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY; RISK-FACTORS; COLORECTAL SURGERY; TRAUMA LAPAROTOMY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.026
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: We sought to determine if there was a relationship between skin management and surgical site infections (SSIs) among patients undergoing a laparotomy for emergency general surgery (EGS). We hypothesize that skin closure technique is not associated with SSI. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of adult patients (>18 y) who underwent an exploratory laparotomy for EGS conditions within 6 h of surgical consultation from 2015 to 2019. Patients whose fascia was not closed during the index operation were excluded. Patients were divided into groups: open skin (OS) and closed skin (CS). OS included negative pressure wound therapy or wet-to-dry gauze; CS included closure with staples or sutures. Our primary outcome was the rate of SSI. Results: The cohort comprised 388 patients: 42.3% OS (n = 164) and 57.7% CS (n = 224). The OS group had greater rates of systemic inflammatory response syndrome [SIRS] (54.9% versus 27.7%, P < 0.0001), hollow viscus perforation [HVP] (71.3% versus 20.5%, P < 0.0001), and peritoneal drains (51.2% versus 17.9%, P < 0.0001). Rates of OS management increased as wound class severity increased (0% [I] versus 12.2% [II] versus 15.9% [III] versus 72% [IV], P < 0.0001). The SSI rate for the cohort was 3.6% (n = 14); there was no difference in SSI rates (2.7% versus 4.9%, P = 0.3) between the CS or OS groups. Median length of stay was longer for the OS group (10 d versus 6.5 d, P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of OS management were SIRS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.93, P = 0.04), HVP (aOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.09-3.8, P = 0.03), and class III/IV wounds (aOR 8.65, 95% CI 4.43-16.89, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: OS management occurs more often in patients with SIRS, HVP, and dirty wounds after EGS laparotomies. However, we found no difference in SSI between groups, suggesting that skin closure can be considered in contaminated or dirty wounds. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 195
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preventive NPWT over closed incisions in general surgery: Does age matter?
    Pellino, Gianluca
    Sciaudone, Guido
    Candilio, Giuseppe
    De Fatico, G. Serena
    Landino, Isabella
    Della Corte, Angela
    Guerniero, Raffaella
    Benevento, Raffaella
    Santoriello, Antonio
    Campitiello, Ferdinando
    Selvaggi, Francesco
    Canonico, Silvestro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 : S64 - S68
  • [2] Open and Closed Approaches to Skin Closure After Nonelective Open Colorectal Operations
    Turcotte, Justin J.
    Allen, Rebecca S.
    Klune, J. Robert
    Feather, Cristina B.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (06) : 2520 - 2528
  • [3] Open Surgical Incisions After Colorectal Surgery Improve Quality Metrics, But Do Patients Benefit?
    Mullen, Matthew G.
    Hawkins, Robert B.
    Johnston, Lily E.
    Shah, Puja M.
    Turrentine, Florence E.
    Hedrick, Traci L.
    Friel, Charles M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (05) : 622 - 628
  • [4] Readmission after emergency general surgery
    Kelley, Katherine M.
    Collins, Jay
    Britt, L. D.
    Taylor, DaShaunda D. H.
    Britt, Rebecca
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 220 (03) : 731 - 735
  • [5] Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions in General and Colorectal Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sahebally, Shaheel Mohammad
    McKevitt, Kevin
    Stephens, Ian
    Fitzpatrick, Fidelma
    Deasy, Joseph
    Burke, John Patrick
    McNamara, Deborah
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (11)
  • [6] Outcomes of primary fascial closure after open abdomen for nontrauma emergency general surgery patients
    O'Meara, Lindsay
    Ahmad, Sarwat B.
    Glaser, Jacob
    Diaz, Jose J.
    Bruns, Brandon R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 210 (06) : 1126 - 1130
  • [7] The Open Abdomen After Intra-Abdominal Contamination in Emergency General Surgery
    Nzenwa, Ikemsinachi C.
    Rafaqat, Wardah
    Abiad, May
    Lagazzi, Emanuele
    Panossian, Vahe S.
    Hoekman, Anne H.
    Arnold, Suzanne
    Ghaddar, Karen A.
    Dewane, Michael P.
    Velmahos, George C.
    Kaafarani, Haytham M. A.
    Hwabejire, John O.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 301 : 37 - 44
  • [8] General Principles in the Consensus of SSI Management After Spine Surgery
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Divi, Srikanth N.
    Bronson, Wesley H.
    Boody, Barrett S.
    Segar, Anand H.
    Russo, Glenn S.
    Kaye, Ian David
    Sirch, Frank J.
    Galetta, Matthew S.
    Goyal, Dhruv K. C.
    Fang, Taolin
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (05): : E191 - E198
  • [9] Surgical Apgar scores predict complications after emergency general surgery laparotomy
    Tracy, Brett M.
    Srinivas, Shruthi
    Baselice, Holly
    Gelbard, Rondi B.
    Coleman, Julia R.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2024, 96 (03) : 429 - 433
  • [10] Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Open Chest Management After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
    Hatachi, Takeshi
    Sofue, Toshiki
    Ito, Yukie
    Inata, Yu
    Shimizu, Yoshiyuki
    Hasegawa, Moyu
    Kugo, Yosuke
    Yamauchi, Sanae
    Iwai, Shigemitsu
    Takeuchi, Muneyuki
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (09) : 801 - 808