Cross-National Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Within Adolescent Populations: Findings From 43 Countries

被引:0
|
作者
Sischka, Philipp E. [1 ]
Martin, Gina [2 ]
Residori, Caroline [1 ]
Hammami, Nour [3 ]
Page, Nicholas [4 ]
Schnohr, Christina [5 ]
Cosma, Alina [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[2] Athabasca Univ, Athabasca, AB, Canada
[3] Trent Univ Durham, Oshawa, ON, Canada
[4] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Dev Evaluat Complex & Implementat Publ Hlth Im, Cardiff, Wales
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[7] Palacky Univ, Olomouc, Czech Republic
关键词
WHO-5 Well-Being Index; item response theory; measurement invariance; differential item functioning; cross-cultural research; adolescents; short scale; well-being; Health Behaviour in School-aged Children; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; MEASUREMENT ERROR; DEPRESSION; INVARIANCE; HEALTH; INFORMATION; CHILDREN; FUTURE; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1177/10731911241309452
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most frequently used brief standard measures to assess hedonic well-being. Numerous studies have investigated different facets of its psychometric properties in adult populations. However, whether these results apply to adolescents is uncertain, and only few psychometric studies employed adolescent populations. Thus, the current study aimed to conduct an in-depth psychometric item response theory analysis of the WHO-5 among adolescents from 43 countries using the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) 2022 data set and investigated its (a) dimensionality and measurement structure, (b) test information values and marginal reliability, (c) cross-country measurement invariance and differential item/test functioning, and (d) convergent validity with other measures related to mental health and well-being across countries. The WHO-5 showed a unidimensional measurement structure and overall high test information values and marginal reliability. Furthermore, although a large proportion of parameters were flagged as non-invariant, differential test functioning of the WHO-5 was only modest. Moreover, the WHO-5 mainly showed a concurring nomological network with the other measures related to mental health and well-being across countries, although with some differences in effect sizes. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index is a psychometrically sound measure that has shown promise for cross-cultural research among adolescents in the included European, Central Asia, and North American countries. The translated versions of the WHO-5 are available at https://osf.io/pbexq.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Translation and Validation of the Malay Version of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index: Reliability and Validity Evidence from a Sample of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
    Suhaimi, Aida Farhana
    Makki, Shahidah Mohamed
    Tan, Kit-Aun
    Silim, Umi Adzlin
    Ibrahim, Normala
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)
  • [22] WHO-5 well-being index as screening instrument for psychological comorbidity in patients with temporomandibular disorder
    Ismail, Fadi
    Lange, Karin
    Gillig, Marit
    Zinken, Katarzyna
    Schwabe, Lena
    Stiesch, Meike
    Eisenburger, Michael
    CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2018, 36 (03): : 189 - 194
  • [23] Well-Being and Social Capital on Planet Earth: Cross-National Evidence from 142 Countries
    Calvo, Rocio
    Zheng, Yuhui
    Kumar, Santosh
    Olgiati, Analia
    Berkman, Lisa
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [24] The satisfaction with life scale and the well-being index WHO-5 in young Peruvians: a network analysis
    Lingan-Huaman, Susana K.
    Ventura-Leon, Jose
    Sakihara, Claudia Terukina
    Callo, Camila Camero
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE AND YOUTH, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [25] Measuring psychological well-being in a danish pregnancy cohort using the self-reported WHO-5 index
    Christiansen, Cecilie Holm
    Christensen, Karl Bang
    Hogh, Stinne
    Renault, Kristina M.
    Emborg, Marie Stampe
    Frokjaer, Vibe G.
    Hegaard, Hanne
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [26] Reliability and Validity of Gujarati Version of WHO-5 Well-being Index in Community-dwelling Older Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study
    Dalal, Vipra
    Khatri, Subhash
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (12) : YC9 - YC12
  • [27] Using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index to Identify College Students at Risk for Mental Health Problems
    Downs, Andrew
    Boucher, Laura A.
    Campbell, Duncan G.
    Polyakov, Anita
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 58 (01) : 113 - 117
  • [28] Validation of the World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) among medical educators in Hong Kong: a confirmatory factor analysis
    Chan, Linda
    Liu, Rebecca K. W.
    Lam, Tai Pong
    Chen, Julie Y.
    Tipoe, George L.
    Ganotice, Fraide A.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2022, 27 (01):
  • [29] Assessing the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization -five well-being index (WHO-5) in Filipino samples amid the COVID-19 pandemic
    Gallemit, I. Marie Joy S.
    Mordeno, Imelu G.
    Simon, Patricia D.
    Ferolino, Michelle Anne L.
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [30] Test-retest reliability and measurement error of the Danish WHO-5 Well-being Index in outpatients with epilepsy
    Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen
    de Thurah, Annette
    Bech, Per
    Hjollund, Niels Henrik
    Christiansen, David Hoyrup
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2018, 16